Bulletins
| Bulletin | Bulletin date | Replacement Bulletin | Item no. | Summary | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | |||||
| 2304304 | 03/09/2005 | 2301505 | 10013780 | Transit film removal. 2006 chrysler pt cruiser, and 2005-2006 ram truck *sc | 04/26/2005 |
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | |||
| 08/01/2012 | 90000 | ||
| My car started overheating, so we have replaced the thermostat, fan fuses, and it is still overheating. my cousin has the same car only a 2002 which it overheated and caused the head to blow. there are many many many complaints on line however i am not seeing very many people with the complaints on this site. just doing a search on line for pt cruiser overheating problems there are tons of them. why would there not be a recall on something that is a known issue? i have a 2001 dodge caravan that has never had any serious problems, with 200,000 miles on it. this car has 90k on it and there is a list of things that the previous owner had repaired, like double what the car was originally purchased for i have about $10,000.00 worth of repair bills, thats a little like a lemon car. | |||
| 12/01/2011 | 50000 | ||
| My pt crusier has had to have all of the front end replaced, car started acting up at 50,000 miles and i now how almost 81,000 and i have replaced everything in the front end except the cv joints, which i hope does not need after i send this. i just had to have the rack and pinion done. when speaking with crysler directly they state that the pt cruiser has had a lot of recalls due to front end, but i am told that my vin number does not fall in the mix. i am the only owner of my pt cruiser. i have replaced parts on my car starting back in 2010 early 2011. | |||
| 03/20/2010 | 69482 | ||
| Replaced the leak detection pump on march 20, 2010 and again on october 26, 2011 | |||
| 01/01/1901 | 1 | ||
| Consumer is concerned about the electrical stability control in vehicles *gr the consumer believed that adding electronic stability controls as a mandatory feature was an evasive decision. *jb the consumer also protested the proposed legislation of event data recorders. the consumer stated he has not experienced any problems with his vehicle. updated 06/21/10*jb | |||