Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
STRUCTURE
974702/17/199751689Frame- rivet replacement with bolts- service tips. *jd06/27/1997
STRUCTURE - BODY - BUMPERS
BC417895040104/01/19953055145Unknown11/01/1995
957704/01/199541008The front bumper mounting torque specification has been revised for better overall bumper retention and performance. *tw11/01/1995
BC292295040104/01/199539847Revised mounting torque for bumpers. *tw11/01/1995
STRUCTURE - BODY - DOOR
99-8-1505/03/1999606419Subject regarding door trim panel replacement - service tip. *tt01/05/2001

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
STRUCTURE - BODY
03/08/1997812/21/1994
 Warped front brake pads/rotors caused a crash/injuries. also frame crossmember failed.
07/28/19958
 Missing frame rivet caused vehicle to shake resulting in loss of control. *tt.
STRUCTURE - BODY - BUMPERS
01/26/19956
 When brakes applied, vehicle vibrates out of control, attempt to repair 6 times to no avail, abs system. tt transmission slips. wiper control module failed. replaced radio. rear bumper replaced due to rust at only 8915 miles. clunk noise when turning in driveway, dealer tightened front shocks and crossmember. brakes cause vibration, squeaks, grinding, dealer replaced pads and rotors. poor gas mileage. front hubs replaced. *slc
STRUCTURE - BODY - DOOR
03/27/2000108/01/1995
 I own a 95 ford f150, the frame of the door in which the interior door handle assembly is mounted to is torn. the tears are in the door where the assembly has a tab that slides into the door and where the assembly bolts to the door. this gives too much and does not allow the driver to open the vehicle from the interior of the vehicle. this can create a very dangerous situation in trying to evacuate the vehicle in case of fire or eminent danger. i contacted the local ford dealer who were very familiar with this problem and was told for $80 and two weeks of wait they could weld the torn areas. i then contacted ford motor company and was told my vehicle is not under warranty and this was not an item that was recalled. a solution to this would be to have an actual cross brace to bolt the assembly to and not the thin sheet metal body of the door, thicker metal on the skin of the door, or a way to distribute the stress more evenly.*ak
03/16/19956
 Passenger side door handle failed. *dsh
09/29/1995412/12/1994
 The front disc brakes are always warped and there is unstable braking.tt consumer states there is grinding noise on right front brake, was advised to wait until it got worse, rotors and pads were finally replaced the original rotors were warped, consumer has had to have rotors and pads replaced four time due them being warped, was told that he would be getting a new truck, but has heard nothing else about that consumer also states fuel tank was leaking and also power steering noise, windshield wiper skips when there is light rain and noisy, passenger door handle haas a poor fir, exhaust system is loose, and rear sway bar bushings inoperative, temperature guage always low, shift indicator is off, head lamp is too high.*jb
STRUCTURE - FRAME AND MEMBERS
03/22/200375550101/07/1996
 Frame on a 1995 ford 150 pickup with 75,550 miles is broken in two places , approximately in the same areas on each side of frame. the breaks are located behind the front axle. driver's side is completely cracked through the frame rail. passenger side is cracked at same spot. *jb
05/01/1999
 Underneith front driver side where its ribited at cross member is squeaking, the ribites seem to be not holding very tight, i've had this problem since i've own the truck and finally found the problem, would'nt this be a manufacture problem? thanks*ak
06/07/199710
 Front end frame rivets repaired at ford service center more than once and continues.
07/21/199906/01/1995
 Frame rivets under engine compartment loose/rattling
05/01/1998
 There is a terrible popping noise when the transmission shifts or the torque on the frame changes due to turning or braking, the problem goes away when the bolts are tightened, but reappears after 100-200 miles.
 The bolts which hold the sub-frame in place are loose, causing the transmission to squeak. consumer has contacted the dealer. please provide any further details. *ak
08/04/1998107/01/1995
 Noise coming from were rivet in crossmember causing welding to wear and allowing member to slide.
06/06/1995
 The front part of the frame is very loose and can fall off and cause an accident. *ak
105/01/1995
 When it is cold and steering wheel turns left or right, the vehicle makes cracking or knocking noise.
10/28/19958
 Frame cracked. *sd
09/01/19951
 Cross member under transmission failed.
STRUCTURE - FRAME AND MEMBERS - UNDERBODY SHIELDS
01/06/200780000403/26/2000
 1995 f150 with 120 000 kms, made in usa, 4/95, #1) both radius arm bracket/bushing assemblies replaced. part is riveted to frame. both components failed: (a) causing radius arm to 'flop' in its bore, steering & braking control problems; (b) causes radius arm and nut and insulator to protrude forcefully through the bracket, due to metal fatigue. the brackets act as an extension of the 1/4 thick frame, but are constructed of 14 ga mild steel, connected to a 3/4 solid, treated, pivoting rod by an 1 1/4 nut, at high torque setting. traveling at highway speeds could potentially be disastrous upon failure, as the proper camber of the front wheels rely on their integrity. -ford parts worker assures, we replace those all the time. #2 failures of both rear leaf spring-shackle frame brackets. under-engineered, .020 thick brackets, integral to 1/4 frame, by 1/2 rivets. both parts 'ripped', causing shackles and the leaf springs to bang into the truck box and bounce uncontrollably upon highway driving. failure of second bracket due to corrosion of metal - much too thin for the job. pictures conclude the negligence in its design.* brackets, grade 8 bolts and nuts, bushing and shackles must be replaced simultaneously in order to repair the issue: back to its original inferiority. q: how does one access documents that prove suitability of a vehicle's structural component? --does the government not have any standards for ford to follow? --do the engineers follow the laws of basic physics when they design this sort of component? --can ford really get away with selling a product that is expected to fail, only to make money on the resale of a replacement? --safety standards must be put into place somewhere: who enforces them? -- who was the engineer? who approved the plans for these failed parts, well anticipating that they would lend themselves to failure?kindest regards, sol kott *tr