Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
SUSPENSION
0522211/14/200510018737Noise from front while turning steering wheel. *tt01/12/2006
1847903/01/200510014669Squeak from rear of vehicle when driving over bumps. *eh05/05/2005
1835312/01/200410014623Squeak from rear of vehicle when driving over bumps. *eh05/05/2005
SUSPENSION - FRONT
1900501/01/200610019068Grunt or squeak from front suspension during full lock turns - service tip. *tt02/10/2006
SUSPENSION - REAR
061401/01/200610019027Noise from rear suspension - cold only. *tt02/09/2006
1841702/01/200510012973Rear suspension noise when cold. *tt04/05/2005
053206/07/20050510410012948Squeak/clunk noise from rear lower control arm - vehicles built 7/12/2004 through 9/21/2004. *tt04/05/2005

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
SUSPENSION
01/13/20131300001
 Rear upper control arm sheared off at inside bushings during normal driving. wheel assembly fell against frame and some loss of control was experienced. both sides of control arm (ford part# 5a804) broke off from fatigue. *tr
01/13/2013130000
 Rear upper control arm sheared off at inside bushings during normal driving. wheel assembly fell against frame and some loss of control was experienced. both sides of control arm (ford part# 5a804) broke off from fatigue.
08/05/20050
 Tsb 10-2-13 i have inner rear tire wear, especially on the right (this likely existed when purchased new). there is a tsb that talks about some cars with rr negative camber, (which my car does have), and also talks about how to modify the rear control arm to remedy the problem. the danger in this defect is a blowout of a tire or tires while driving. car is immaculate. i bought it new and take great care of it. this is obviously a defect given how many other owners are commenting it on-line via forums. also, there is a tsb on it, so ford is aware of it. even though they should take care of it since it is a defect, they won't. ford, even with all their hype on quality and safety as job one, are just a bunch of hypocrites. they act only when forced to do so by you folks at the federal level. i'm old school...it's all about integrity for me. why do you think ford still lives up to their reputation as fix or repair daily. had a similar issue with the rear brakes several years ago on this vehicle. i took it for ford and they would not own up to it until i complained to you folks like many other did and they finally reimbursed us because of your intervention....again, they always have to be forced to do the right thing! just a bunch of thugs. where is elliot ness when you need him! 02/15/10 suspension - rear tire inner edge wear ford: 2005-2007 five hundred, freestyle 2008-2009 taurus x, taurus
06/03/2011
 The vehicle lunges while holding the brake when putting into reverse or drive and continues to do so while waiting to pull into traffic making it very dangerous! it also does this while trying to park making it dangerous to park near anything! i have seen several complaints regarding this very same problem stating it is a throttle body defect that costs at lowest $700.00 to repair. front suspension is shot already with loud clunking noises, very rough ride! rear doors fill with water which will result in rust holes! all of these problems have been reported several times by other owners of this same year and make of vehicle. ford should be responsible for the repairs needed to fix these problems.
01/11/20061500110/11/2005
 Vibration on right front of car during speeds of 55 mph to 62 mp. replaced continental tires with michelin and vibration still occurs. *jb
06/15/20053500603/28/2005
 Continuation of suspension and brake problems after last filing with nhtsa. braking in wet weather, descending steep grade, car pulls and fades. 2 days after longmont ford had car for 6 days and returned it with clean bill of health. omera ford diagnosed brake and transmission programming problems and once again turned down rear rotors to very close to minimum specifications. consumer report jan 2005 reports similar issues with braking, auto-week may-16-2005 reports brake fade and stability problems in their test track report. this is a first model year car for ford which is based off of a modified volvo design of under-carriage. the vehicle is now parked with an affidavit of non use on it because of the number of incidents and repairs that have occurred on rear suspension and brakes. ford at arbitration maintained that in late july there were more tsb's issued for the 2005 ford 500, but i am unable to find same on nhtsa website. with the number of independent trade and consumer publications that site the same issues that i am having with this car, i petition nhtsa to pull some of these early model cars and subject them to suspension and braking test as stated in nhtsa 99.6583-1 consumer braking information initiative, aberdeen test center fall 1998. *jb
SUSPENSION - FRONT
03/02/201147000
 I own a 2005 ford 500. i have had to have the right passenger front ball joint tightened several times. the local ford dealer does not what is causing this issue. the ball joint becomes loose cause the front end to come out of alignment and will jerk the car across the highway.
SUSPENSION - FRONT - STABILIZER BAR
01/22/200736217107/22/2005
 Driving my 2005 ford 500 with 36, 216 miles to work in a.m. on 1/22/07, suddenly experienced car going from side to side while driving on highway. hard to control, had to greatly reduce speed to keep control of vehicle. upon accelerating, felt as if i was having to pull the vehicle down the road. took immediately to ford dealership and was told that the sway bar in the rear was bad. service told me that this was very unusual and advised me to contact ford directly. phoned ford and was told that they would have to research the sway bar problem more and would contact me within 2-3 business days. currently waiting on parts for repair, as dealership does not keep them in stock due to this being a very rare occurrence. service feels that factory sway bar must have been defective. *jb
SUSPENSION - REAR
04/04/201187000
 Ford five hundred 2005 model: rear axle assembly is failing - produces noice.
05/25/2006195404/23/2006
 Rear and front suspension have failed within five months of possession. first repair attempt on rear suspension occurred in may 2006, just 4 weeks after purchasing the 2005 model. ford certified technicians claimed there was a loose bracket and that problem was solved but problem with noise and hard bounce still occurred. second repair attempt occurred one month later, found broken right, rear shock. repair took three days. four days later had to return to get front end aligned. on september 9, 2006, took back again for same noise coming from right rear shock. certified technicians stated that there was not fix for problem and simply greased cables. taking back to shop to address front suspension noise and handling problem. *nm
03/25/2005403/04/2005
 Ford five hundred 2005 with brake failure, defective radio, driver side window regulator replaced twice. *** no answer required*** *ts there was a noise in the rear end of the vehicle, the left rear brake caliper at the piston seal was leaking. *jb
04/19/2005714503/28/2005
 Problems with suspension on 2005 ford 500's. numerous technical service bulletins address rear brake and suspension problems. lemon law criteria meet in colorado, submitted certified mail and it took ford over a week to accept letter, only after i visited attorney general. car could not be driven at speed limit on i-80 creating a dangerous situation. as of today the car is at the ford dealer again. ford regional rep says they won't take it back. tuesday 4/19/2005 miles in to dealer 2091 miles problems going to lincoln, nebraska, could not hold speed limit on i-80 because of handling problems and suspension reporting vibrations and noises to driver. no trouble found