Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
TIRES
05262401/01/200510018938Vibration diagnosis - tire/wheel runout. *tt01/25/2006

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
TIRES
06/04/201182000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2005 ford ranger equipped with hankook radial h714 tires (na), tire size 225/70/15. while driving approximately 65 mph, there was a loud noise outside of the vehicle. the contact maneuvered to the side of the road and noticed the front passenger side tire exploded. the tire was replaced with a spare tire. the manufacturer was made aware of the defect. the approximate failure mileage was 82,000. the dot number was 1guuaph. js
11/26/2009308951
 Continental tires.....i own 2 vehicles that have come equipped with continental tires and found that over time both sets of tires have worn out due too poor quality of the tire. i have gone on line and looked up on the web site under continental tire and clicked on complaints about these tires and it is alarming how many people are finding that the tires from continental are poorly made and the quality of these tires is putting people in harms way , due to blowouts , tread separation, premature ware . i live in tucson az and just about every tire dealer within 20 miles of me wont even recommend a tire built by continental. replacing these tires with something different is the only option to be sure you don't have happen to you ,what most people have had happen to them , after you read the complaints posted on the web site of continental tire, i find it necessary to file a complaint about these tires and the company. i feel that someone needs to read the complaints on the web site, and take a look to see if there is something that can be done , to get answers as to why continental feels that there's no problem with there tires. on my 2005 ford ranger the tires had 30,000 miles on them and in the owners manual , the tires had a 6 year pro-rated warranty on them. the tire dealer here in tucson was told by continental that they didn't cover the tire from normal wear. the dealer explained to continental that the tires in question were pre-maturely wearing out on the inside edges and the middle of the face of the tire. continental more less said too bad and wouldn't do any thing about it. this happened on my wife's ford escape also, and we had replaced her original tires that came on her car , with the same continental brand, and they only lasted 23,000 miles . these tires were rated for 50,000. i not sure what can be done about this, but i feel people need to let some consumer complaint groups know there is a problem that exists here. *tr
09/14/2008170001
 A tire valve stem, # dill 414, was leaking air around the base. this valve stem came on a brand new 2005 ford ranger, purchased in july of 2005, which is prior to the present recall period. *tr
04/29/20071
 2005 ford ranger. while driving 65 mph on the ohio turnpike switching to the far right lane, the back right tire blew out and the truck swerved and the uhaul trailer flipped several times. *mc (ohio traffic crash report)*jb
TIRES - PRESSURE MONITORING AND REGULATING SYSTEMS
11/08/2008590001
 Valve stem failure, 2005 ford ranger. i've been driving for 30 years, and never had a valve stem just crack while driving causing a loss of pressure. there is a recall of some kind on 06 ford products, i just wanted you to know that it could be bigger that what was thought. *tr
TIRES - SIDEWALL
05/26/20062386110/01/2005
 Dt*: the contact stated the right rear tire blew out suddenly without warning. the contact was traveling 55 mph. the tire pressure was maintained on the tire. the manufacturer of the tire is continental contitrac. the tire size was: p23570r16. *ak
TIRES - VALVE
11/08/2008590001
 Valve stem failure, 2005 ford ranger. i've been driving for 30 years, and never had a valve stem just crack while driving causing a loss of pressure. there is a recall of some kind on 06 ford products, i just wanted you to know that it could be bigger that what was thought. *tr