Investigations
| NHTSA ID | Manufacturer | Date open | Date close | Subject | Recall campaign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIRES - VALVE | ||||||
| PE08060 | FORD MOTOR COMPANY | 10/14/2008 | 04/09/2009 | TIRE VALVE CRACKING | ||
| On october 14, 2008, odi opened pe08-060 to investigate allegations of cracked and leaking snap-in tire valves in model year (my) 2007 vehicles manufactured by ford motor company.the valves were supplied to ford by topseal auto-parts, a subsidiary of the shanghai baolong automotive corporation in china.valves made by topseal for aftermarket sale were the subject of two recent safety recalls by tech international (08t-018) and dill air controls (08t-028), the latter of which was investigated by odi in pe08-036 and ea08-022.the defect conditions addressed by the aftermarket tire valve recalls both involved inadequate resistance to ozone cracking due to issues with the supply of anti-ozonant chemicals to topseal for a period from july to mid-november 2006.the aftermarket valves were compounded with a blend of epdm and natural rubber, using a relatively low percentage of epdm (epdm provides inherent resistance to ozone cracking).hence, the need for anti-ozonant chemicals and the problems with cracking when those chemicals were missing or out of specification in some lots of valves.both recall campaigns involved inspection programs to identify and replace valves with visible surface cracking.although the topseal valves supplied to ford also appear to have been affected by the anti-ozonant supply issues in mid to late-2006, ford indicated that its valves were made at a different topseal production line and were compounded with a higher percentage of epdm rubber to meet more stringent specifications from ford.odi's analysis of complaint and warranty data provided by ford showed that problems with cracked tire valves were significantly higher for my 2007 vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007.ford responded by implementing changes in its material specifications for snap-in rubber tire valves and also increasing the quality and acceptance standards for valves imported for use in its vehicles.while the complaint and warranty claim rates are elevated for subject vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007, the rates of leaking valves are well below one percent of production for each of the peak months for all of the affected models.a substantial majority of the subject vehicles are equipped with tire pressure monitoring systems (tpms) which warn the driver when any tire pressures drops below 25 percent of recommended inflation pressure. as outlined in a letter to odi dated april 6, 2009, ford has agreed to send letters to owners of certain my 2007 and 2008 ford, lincoln and mercury vehicles to provide information about the cracking concern. letters will be sent to owners of vehicles built from november 2006 through may 2007.owners can opt for a free dealer inspection.valves exhibiting surface cracks or air leakage related to ozone attack will be replaced by ford under its normal warranty terms.ford expects to send the letter by approximately mid-may 2009. based on the use of tpms in the majority of subject vehicles and the relatively low rates of repairs associated with leaking valves and resultant tire damage, odi believes that the actions ford has agreed to take will provide effective and expeditious resolution for vehicles that were built during the period when valves with inadequate resistance to ozone cracking were most likely to have been used in vehicle production.further investigation of this matter would not be an efficient allocation of agency resources.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist.the agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted. | ||||||
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIRES | |||
| 10/27/2011 | 20000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2008 ford ranger. the contact stated that all four tires were making a noise when the vehicle was being driven. the contact stated that the tires did not show any sign of excessive wear. the contact had not spoken with the manufacturer and the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 20,000. the vin was not available. kmj | |||
| 10/27/2011 | 20000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2008 ford ranger. the contact stated that all four tires make noise when driving. the contact the tires do not show any sign of excessive were, but they make noise whenever the vehicle is being driven. the contact had not spoken with the manufacturer.rl | |||
| 08/10/2008 | 8300 | 1 | 03/01/2008 |
| Tl*the contact owns a 2008 ford ranger. while attempting to rotate the tires, the contact noticed that the tire tread was chopping or uneven. the dealer stated that the tire wear was a result of pulling his trailer on the rear of the vehicle without using the trailer pulling device. the owner's manual stated that the vehicle should be able to carry between 3,000-3,500 lbs. ford refused to replace the tires, which were not covered under warranty. the dealer was instructed by ford to adjust the torsion bar. the failure was discovered to be a mechanical issue, rather than a tire issue. the vin was unknown. the failure mileage was 8,300 and current mileage was 9,136. updated 09/23/08 *bf the consumer stated the vehicle would sway and vibrate due to the chopped tires. updated 10/01/08. *jb | |||
| 11/11/2007 | 300 | 1 | 11/09/2007 |
| Tl*the contact owns a 2008 ford ranger with goodyear wrangler 235/75/r15 tires. while approaching a stop light at approximately 10 mph and applying the brakes, the vehicle hydroplaned into the right lane. the contact was able to maintain control of the vehicle. she observed that the tires are for passenger vehicles and not for light pick up trucks. the dealer stated that she would have to pay the full price for new tires. the approximate failure mileage was 300 and the approximate current mileage is 8,000. updated 5/13/08 *cn updated 05/13/07. *jb | |||