Investigations
| NHTSA ID | Manufacturer | Date open | Date close | Subject | Recall campaign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | ||||||
| PE05020 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 04/28/2005 | 09/13/2005 | UNWANTED LOW-SPEED ABS ACTIVATION | 05V379000 | |
| In a letter dated august 29, 2005, gm notified odi that it was recalling certain model year 1999 through 2002 c/k pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles to correct a problem with anti-lock brake system (abs) wheel speed sensor corrosion that may result in unwanted abs activation and extended stopping distances during low-speed braking (recall 05v-379).gm's recall covers approximately 804,000 vehicles currently registered in the following 14 salt-belt states:connecticut, illinois, indiana, massachusetts, maine, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, and west virginia.the recall procedure will involve removing the sensor, cleaning the mounting surface, applying a rust inhibitor (zinc-x) to the surface, and reinstalling the sensor.if necessary, the sensor will be replaced. the population and failure report data given in this resume are for the full region that has been considered by odi as the salt-belt.that includes delaware, iowa, maryland, minnesota, missouri, wisconsin and the district of columbia in addition to the 14 states included in 05v-379.the states covered by gm's recall have the highest incident rates for the subject condition, accounting for 91% of the incidents, but only 24% of subject vehicle sales in the united states.odi's analysis determined that 840 of the complaints, 244 of the crashes, and 16 of the injuries identified in this investigation occurred in those states.the resulting incident and crash rates are 96.2 and 28.0 per 100,000 vehicles respectively (note:rates are based on vehicle sales, not registered vehicles). the corresponding numbers in the excluded portions of the salt-belt are 399,000 vehicles, 81 incidents (20.3 per 100,000 vehicles), 3 crashes, and no injuries.the statistics in the remaining 30 states are 2,406,000 vehicles, 168 incidents (7.0 per 100,000 vehicles), 31 crashes, and one injury.gm and odi are continuing to monitor the problem experience in states that are not included in the recall.gm will provide odi with updated complaint, field report, and warranty data in november 2005.odi and gm will review that data and assess the appropriateness of the current scope of the recall at that time. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - CONTROL UNIT/MODULE | ||||||
| PE05020 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 04/28/2005 | 09/13/2005 | UNWANTED LOW-SPEED ABS ACTIVATION | 05V379000 | |
| In a letter dated august 29, 2005, gm notified odi that it was recalling certain model year 1999 through 2002 c/k pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles to correct a problem with anti-lock brake system (abs) wheel speed sensor corrosion that may result in unwanted abs activation and extended stopping distances during low-speed braking (recall 05v-379).gm's recall covers approximately 804,000 vehicles currently registered in the following 14 salt-belt states:connecticut, illinois, indiana, massachusetts, maine, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, and west virginia.the recall procedure will involve removing the sensor, cleaning the mounting surface, applying a rust inhibitor (zinc-x) to the surface, and reinstalling the sensor.if necessary, the sensor will be replaced. the population and failure report data given in this resume are for the full region that has been considered by odi as the salt-belt.that includes delaware, iowa, maryland, minnesota, missouri, wisconsin and the district of columbia in addition to the 14 states included in 05v-379.the states covered by gm's recall have the highest incident rates for the subject condition, accounting for 91% of the incidents, but only 24% of subject vehicle sales in the united states.odi's analysis determined that 840 of the complaints, 244 of the crashes, and 16 of the injuries identified in this investigation occurred in those states.the resulting incident and crash rates are 96.2 and 28.0 per 100,000 vehicles respectively (note:rates are based on vehicle sales, not registered vehicles). the corresponding numbers in the excluded portions of the salt-belt are 399,000 vehicles, 81 incidents (20.3 per 100,000 vehicles), 3 crashes, and no injuries.the statistics in the remaining 30 states are 2,406,000 vehicles, 168 incidents (7.0 per 100,000 vehicles), 31 crashes, and one injury.gm and odi are continuing to monitor the problem experience in states that are not included in the recall.gm will provide odi with updated complaint, field report, and warranty data in november 2005.odi and gm will review that data and assess the appropriateness of the current scope of the recall at that time. | ||||||
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES | |||
| 01/18/2013 | 146247 | 1 | |
| While under vehicle to replace gas filter it had become evident to me that the brake lines where they enter the abs unit were fairly rusted. as i investigated further to areas not easily visible i had discovered that all the hydraulic brake lines are extremely rusted and imminent failure is evident. in mentioning this to a friend he suggest i check on line as he had heard of this problem. i was absolutely taken aback to see how common this failure is on these vehicles and that gmc is aware of it, yet they have never apprised me of this possible condition' and that i should take necessary action to prevent failure which could result in serious injury or death ! i have been a mechanic for many years and had worked for gm some years back. i have never observed such deterioration in a vehicle of this age. this vehicle is extremely well maintained in both periodic and preventative maintenance. i do not live by the water, we live in a moderate climate and vehicle is not subject to anything but normal driving conditions. i have (collectible vintage cars) oldest being 36 years old and the lines on all cars look new or in good shape. to my further dissatisfaction i had contacted gmc and they deny any knowledge of this problem or condition. i think all parties concerned should consider the possible catastrophic outcome of this component failure and also take into account the size and weight of these vehicles and the possible secondary consequences in an accident and take immediate remedial action. *tr | |||
| 01/18/2013 | 146247 | ||
| While under vehicle to replace gas filter it had become evident to me that the brake lines where they enter the abs unit were fairly rusted. as i investigated further to areas not easily visible i had discovered that all the hydraulic brake lines are extremely rusted and imminent failure is evident. in mentioning this to a friend he suggest i check on line as he had heard of this problem. i was absolutely taken aback to see how common this failure is on these vehicles and that gmc is aware of it, yet they have never apprised me of this possible condition' and that i should take necessary action to prevent failure which could result in serious injury or death ! i have been a mechanic for many years and had worked for gm some years back. i have never observed such deterioration in a vehicle of this age. this vehicle is extremely well maintained in both periodic and preventative maintenance. i do not live by the water, we live in a moderate climate and vehicle is not subject to anything but normal driving conditions. i have (collectible vintage cars) oldest being 36 years old and the lines on all cars look new or in good shape. to my further dissatisfaction i had contacted gmc and they deny any knowledge of this problem or condition. i think all parties concerned should consider the possible catastrophic outcome of this component failure and also take into account the size and weight of these vehicles and the possible secondary consequences in an accident and take immediate remedial action. | |||
| 08/17/2012 | 163500 | 1 | |
| Broken/leaking brake lines due to severe underbody corrosion: frame,brake and gas lines, front suspension, spare tire assembly, nuts, bolts, exhaust pipes, etc. along with this i replaced two transmissions, once due to radiator failure, fuel pump failure, brake caliper failure, a few sets of rear parking brake shoes because the adjustments dont work properly, three window regulators and all within 163,630 miles. yea i'm pis@#$ off. *tr | |||
| 08/17/2012 | 163500 | ||
| Broken/leaking brake lines due to severe underbody corrosion: frame,brake and gas lines, front suspension, spare tire assembly, nuts, bolts, exhaust pipes, etc. along with this i replaced two transmissions, once due to radiator failure, fuel pump failure, brake caliper failure, a few sets of rear parking brake shoes because the adjustments dont work properly, three window regulators and all within 163630 miles. yea i'm pis@#$ off. | |||
| 08/04/2012 | 100657 | 1 | |
| 2002 denali xl 100.000 mi sudden brake failure pedal to floor no warnings of any kind. new brake pads and rotors installed 8 months ago upon further inspection after stopping vehicle all hard brake lines were rusted through causing loss of brake fluid. *tr | |||
| 08/04/2012 | 100657 | ||
| 2002 denali xl 100.000 mi sudden brake failure pedal to floor no warnings of any kind. new brake pads and rotors installed 8 months ago upon further inspection after stopping vehicle all hard brake lines were rusted through causing loss of break fluid. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||
| 01/15/2013 | 75000 | ||
| While stopping for the stop sign down the block from my house the brake pedal went to the floor. i could not stop the truck, i had to use the emergency brake to stop the truck. i brought the truck back home and found out that the brake line had rusted through causing the brake fluid to leak out. | |||
| 03/04/2012 | 147000 | ||
| Rear brake line failed when my wife pulled truck out of driveway. all brake lines rusted very badly. | |||
| 11/03/2011 | 173598 | ||
| Brake light came on coming down to florida. check fluid and it was way down. took to mech. and discovered some of the brake lines were rusted. one worst than the other. this is a safety hazard and should be recalled at no cost to the customer. the nhtsa should go after the manufacture for this federally regulated defect. | |||
| 08/26/2011 | 93000 | ||
| Brake line failure on my 2002 gmc yukon denali. all brake lines rusted and one failed without a crash. | |||
| 07/04/2011 | 125000 | ||
| Vehicle failed to stop due to brake failure, after pulling over the disabled vehicle a quick inspection revealed rotted brake lines running to the abs control unit which had failed under brake pressure causing immediate loss of braking with no warning or any mil light status prior to failure. all the front brake lines were heavily corroded and all needed replacing before the vehicle was usable. | |||
| 09/17/2010 | 63000 | ||
| The main rear metal brake line on my 2002 gmc yukon xl has sprung a leak due to rust. the vehicle has 63,000 miles. there was a severe loss of pedal pressure,a large increase in stopping distances and large puddles of brake fluid under the vehicle. | |||
| 04/25/2010 | 59990 | ||
| When applying brakes, pedal unexpectedly went to floor & barely avoided collision. had car towed to dealer, notified dealer of brake line failure that nhtsa & gm are aware of, after there for 2 days & dealer not returning our calls, was eventually notified 4 corroded brake lines need replacement at my expense, still waiting for estimate of repair cost going on 3 days. my husband was a mechanic at gm dealers for over 12 years & never seen 1 static brake line rupture nevermind 4 become defective at the same time especially considering the vehicle barely has 60,000 miles on it & has always been well maintained. dealer was very uncooperative in seeking gm remediation assistance for us or taking any self-initiative anytime to keep us informed, vehicle out of service & has been at dealer for going on 3 days now, after not following up with us nor returning our calls just reached dealer right before closing time & was informed they still cannot locate parts at factory or anywhere else, fact that 4 lines defective simultaneously & still unable to locate parts clearly indicates manufacturing defect... no car, no service, no price, no parts, when will it ever end? recommend urgent priority -if not remedied quickly- many lives could be lost! | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | |||
| 09/07/2009 | 121700 | ||
| Tl*the contact owns a 2002 gmc yukon xl denali. the contact stated while driving at 25 mph and slowing down to make a stop the abs begins to activate without warning causing the vehicle to drag to a complete stop. the contact is in the process of taking the vehicle to the dealer for further inspection. the contact called the manufacturer and was informed that because there are no current recalls on the vehicle and the warranty being expired, no compensation would be offered but he was advised to have the vehicle inspected by a dealer. the failure mileage was 121,700 and the current mileage is 124,391. | |||
| 01/01/2008 | 38600 | 99 | 11/18/2002 |
| After two previous repairs (one a recall), our gmc abs brakes are now malfunctioning for the third time. the abs brake system activates on dry pavement at slow speeds, resulting in a longer than normal stopping distance. on numerous occasions, collisions have narrowly been avoided as the abs brake pedal chattering prevents normal braking at crucial times. *tr | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - ABS WARNING LIGHT | |||
| 1 | |||
| Consumer complained about vehicle hesitation. dealer was contacted, and had replaced the throttle body sensor. also abs light turned on dash, as well as the gauges. dealer was contacted ands stated that there was nothing wrong with the vehicle.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - ROTOR | |||
| 09/11/2002 | 38868 | 4 | 08/02/2002 |
| Brake failure. it appears the material the rotors are made of are not up to specifications probably made in china. the surface of the brake pad area is flaking off thus drastically, reducing the barking power of the vehicle, 2002 gmc yukon xl denali. *ak | |||