Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| VISIBILITY | |||
| 12/07/2011 | 915 | ||
| Tl* the contact owns a 2011 honda cr-v. the contact stated that while driving 40 mph, the rear windshield shattered. the vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop and the windshield was replaced. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and offered no assistance. the failure mileage was 915. | |||
| 12/07/2011 | 915 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2011 honda cr-v. the contact stated that while driving 40 mph, the rear windshield shattered. the vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop and the windshield was replaced. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and offered no assistance. the failure mileage was 915. sm. | |||
| 08/01/2011 | 2000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2011 honda cr-v. the contact stated the low beams were defective. the low beam do not give enough light and have made it impossible for the contact to drive the vehicle at night. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who performed a diagnostic test and stated that the low beams were adjusted by the manufacturer and they were unable to correct the failure. the manufacturer stated the low beams meet the department of transportations standard and could not be adjusted. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 2,000 and the current mileage was 5,000. rvk | |||
| 08/01/2011 | 2000 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2011 a honda cr-v. the contact stated that the vehicle low beam was defected. the low beam does not give enough light and caused the contact not to be able to drive the vehicle during the night. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who performed a diagnosed. the dealer stated that the low beam was adjusted by the manufacturer and they were unable to correct the failure. the manufacturer advised that the low beam meet the department of transportation standard and the vehicle low beam could not be adjusted. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 2,000 and the current mileage was 5,000. li | |||
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | |||
| 11/01/2011 | 65 | 1 | |
| Summary: our windshield wiper arm travels from right to left removing rain from the windshield, the wiper pulls the rain back across the windshield blocking the drivers vision. it appears that the design of the windshield arm and blade pulls the water back across the windshield blocking the drivers vision. this factor is extremely dangerous. blocking the dealer was notify with no correction.*tr | |||
| 11/01/2011 | 65 | ||
| Summary: our windshield wiper arm travels from right to left removing rain from the windshield, the wiper pulls the rain back across the windshield blocking the drivers vision. it appears that the design of the windshield arm and blade pulls the water back across the windshield blocking the drivers vision. this factor is extremely dangerous.blocking the dealer was notify with no correction. | |||
| 05/30/2012 | 15234 | ||
| Our windshield wiper arm travels from right to left removing rain from the windshield, the air passing over and around the windshield arm as it returns, the wiper pulls the rain back across the windshield blocking the drivers vision. it appears that the design of the windshield arm and blade causes a vacuum that pulls the water back across the windshield blocking the drivers vision. here in florida with torrential rain storm this factor is extremely dangerous. a quick fix would be airfoil that snaps onto the windshield arm that would direct air into this vacuum behind the wiper blade, destroying the suction that pulls the water back across the windshield blocking the drivers vision. | |||