Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
TIRES
045001111/01/200410017049Replacement tire ordering information. *tt10/21/2005

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
TIRES
12/17/2009660002
 Problemas con el power train. history = en el primer a
05/22/20091
 Bought new cooper 235/60r16 cs4 touring 100v tires on 9/9/08. in may 09 i noticed an uneven bumping from the right front tire. i took the vehicle in and two tires had to be replaced because the tread had separated from the steel belt. i noticed a recall for another cooper tire, but not this one. i now have two new tires but i am still concerned about the two original tires that were purchased in 9/09/08. from september 08 to may28, 09 i only put on 1,576 miles on my vehicle, mostly around town. i fear if i had continued to drive on the original tires they may have separated and caused an accident or rollover of my 2005 hyundai tucson. have there been other reports of this tire separating? do i need to worry about the original two tires that are still on the vehicle? note: the description on my bill describes the tires as cs4 touring. i could not find that exact match in the tire description field. *tr
12/12/2008360001
 This car was purchased on may 2005 and now dec 2008 the tires are all worn out, the dealership was contacted and they said that nothing was to be done. the warranty is expired. only at 36,000 miles??? this is crap/.#$$%^^ *tr
09/26/2008190001
 The cd player don't work the rear tires are worn out to the point they have no tread at all and i have just 19000 miles and the dealer and manufacture say that my warranty does not cover this is on a 2005 hyundai tuscon the tires are bf goodrich this tire company and hyundai company should be checked out because this is wrong. *tr
04/10/2008210001
 My wife and i own a 2005 hyundai tucson. after 20,000 miles we had to replace the tires as the treads were worn all the way down. this occurred in november 2006. we purchased tires with a 60,000 mile tread warranty and obtained an alignment. in april 2008, we were notified that the vehicle would not pass inspection due to extreme treadware. the driver's tire on the inside was at 0 while the rest were around 4. my wife could had suffered a tire blowout. the dealership informed us that some hyundais require additional bolts to get the camber within manufacturers specs,. bit they do not consider that a warranty issue. this is a matter that affects the safety of the occupants if a vehicle can not be aligned. the tires wore extremely quickly. needless to say, we were forced to have these parts put into the vehicle in order to make it safe. i think that there needs to be a recall for this matter. hyundai is putting cars out there that do not comply with there own specs, chew through tires and could potentially cause accidents due to tire blowouts. *tr
TIRES - TREAD/BELT
09/15/200715557411/01/2004
 Tl*the contact owns a 2005 hyundai tucson. the vehicle has b.f. goodrich tires. while driving 25 mph, the contact heard a noise and the steering wheel began to shake. the vehicle was pulled to a repair shop. the mechanic stated that the front passenger side tire was flat. upon inspection of the tires, the mechanic noticed that all of the tires were worn. the tire size and dot number were unknown. the current and failure mileages were 15,557.
04/08/200727100110/22/2005
 Purchased this vehicle in 10/05 and have been very pleased with until recently. got a card in the mail for a free 34 point inspection from the dealership, and decided on april 5, 2007 to use it. during inspection nothing was brought to my attention. then this week on may 8, 2007 the check enginelight came on. took vehicle back to dealer for check. i was advised that some valve was bad and they replaced it, but by the way, you need 4 new tires and an alignment right away. recently while driving in the rain i had noticed that the vehicle was all over the place, hydroplaning. i felt very unsafe and glanced at my tires. strange enough, all 4 tires were evenly worn out and near completely bald. did i mention that i only had 27,000 miles on them ,and i have not been anywhere but regular streets. but not being the tire expert i took the dealership at their word and assumed all was well. so, a bit annoyed on may 8,2007 i decided to look up my warranty paperwork. how ironic! there were two pamphlets for tires in my little handy little hyundai owner's pack. one for these great 60,000 mile good year tires,, and then the other for the hankook, kumho tires that just happened to have only a 24,000 mile warranty, and happened to be the ones that had apparently been put on my car. so, not only losing a customer to a sneaky bait and switch tactic during the sale of the lx model tucson, the dealership and the tire maker put my safety at risk and tried to blame it on a poor alignment. i may be a woman, and one that didn't know a lot about cars, but i did know that if a vehicle was out of alignment all fours tires weren't worn evenly and completely bald after an inspection that took place just a month prior, yet wasn't mentioned . i was still pleased with tuscon, but very angry with dealership tactics. *ak