Recalls

CampaignManufacturerManufacturing dateType# of units affectedDate Owner notified MfgRecall Initiated byManufacturers of recalled vehicles/productsReport Recieved DateRecord Creation DateRegulation Part NumberFMVSS Number
SUSPENSION - REAR
10V436000ISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA V (Vehicle)14999212/10/2010ODIISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA09/22/201009/23/2010
Defect SummaryIsuzu is recalling certain model year 1998-2002 isuzu rodeo and model year 2002 isuzu axiom vehicles, and honda is recalling certain 1998-2002 honda passport vehicles, that were originally sold, or are currently registered, in the states of maine, new hampshire, vermont, massachusetts, rhode island, connecticut, new york, new jersey, pennsylvania, delaware, maryland, the district of columbia, west virginia, ohio, indiana, michigan, illinois, wisconsin, minnesota, iowa, missouri, and kentucky. vehicles that have experienced sustained exposure to highly corrosive materials used in some jurisdictions for road deicing purposes may experience excessive corrosion in the vicinity of the forward mounting point bracket for the left or right rear suspension lower link prior to the time that such corrosion would normally be expected.
Consequence SummaryExcessive corrosion may result in the left or right rear suspension lower link bracket becoming detached from the frame, which can affect vehicle handling and potentially cause a crash.
Corrective SummaryDealers will inspect the rear suspension lower link bracket area. for vehicles in which little or no corrosion is found, the area will be treated with an anti-corrosive compound. for vehicles in which corrosion has damaged the rear suspension lower link bracket and affected its connection to the vehicle frame, a reinforcement bracket will be installed. in the rare event the corrosion is so severe that the reinforcement bracket remedy would not be appropriate, isuzu and honda will develop an appropriate remedy. all inspections and remedies will be provided free of charge for vehicles that are 10 years old or less. for vehicles older than 10 years, isuzu will offer a free remedy, but only if the vehicle is presented to an isuzu service facility, or honda dealer (as applicable), dealer within 12 months of when owner notifications were issued. the safety recall is expected to begin early december 2010. isuzu owners may contact isuzu at 1-800-255-6727. honda owners may contact honda at 1-800-999-1009.
NotesOwners may also contact the national highway traffic safety administration's vehicle safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (tty 1-800-424-9153), or go to http://www.safercar.gov .

Bulletins

BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
SUSPENSION
SB0108S00104/01/2001SB0008S003621351Some vehicles built prior to vin breakpoint 14330722 equipped with oem p215 / 235 15 inch and p225 / 245 16 inch tires may exhibit a steering wheel vibration / shimmy (nibble) or body vibration through the steering wheel or floorboard respe09/18/2001
IB0006S00103/01/2000613415Subject regarding alignment specification change. *tt07/13/2000
SUSPENSION - REAR
SB0006S00303/01/2000613452Vehicles produced prior to vin breakpoint 5y4331226 may exhibit a condition where excessive paint thickness or uneven mounting surface on certain rear suspension components may cause certain bolts and nuts to loosen. *tt07/19/2000

Investigations

NHTSA IDManufacturerDate openDate closeSubjectRecall campaign
SUSPENSION
EA09018ISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA12/07/200910/15/2010Rear Suspension Lower Link Detachment10V436000
 On september 22, 2010, isuzu manufacturing services of america, inc (isuzu) submitted a defect information report (nhtsa recall 10v-436) to the national highway traffic safety administration affecting approximately 120,000 model year (my) 1998-2002 isuzu rodeo and honda passport vehicles and my 2002 isuzu axiom vehicles originally sold, or currently operated, in the following states:connecticut, delaware, the district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia and wisconsin. all vehicle owners will receive the recall notification.vehicles 10 years of age or younger will be provided with a free remedy.for vehicles older than 10 years, isuzu will offer a free remedy provided the vehicle is presented to an isuzu service facility or a honda dealer (as applicable) no later than twelve (12) months after the date of mailing of the notification letter to the owner.the report describes a condition where vehicles operated in states using certain road deicing materials may exhibit excessive corrosion which may result in the left or right rear suspension lower link bracket becoming detached from the frame.according to isuzu a detached lower link may affect vehicle handling and potentially cause a crash.the office of defects investigation (odi) analyzed complaint data and found that 114 of the 115 (99%) alleged complete lower link separations from the frame occurred in vehicles originally sold or operated in a state covered by the recall. of these complaints 2 involved alleged crashes and 21 involved alleged loss of control incidents.the alleged crashes and loss of control incidents all occurred in vehicles operated in a state covered by the safety recall.isuzu's recall instructs dealers to inspect the rear suspension lower link bracket area to determine if corrosion is present.for vehicles in which corrosion has damaged the lower link bracket area and affected its connection to the vehicle frame, a reinforcement bracket will be installed.for vehicles with no visible signs of corrosion, dealers with apply anti-corrosion material to reduce the likelihood of corrosion developing in the future. based on isuzu's safety recall, this engineering analysis is closed.a copy of the recall may be assessed on nhtsa's website using the reference number above.
PE09030ISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA06/16/200912/08/2009REAR SUSPENSION LOWER LINK FAILURE
 During preliminary evaluation pe09-030, isuzu motors america, inc (isuzu) noted two primary differences once the rear suspension lower link separation occurs between the alleged defect (separation of the lower link from the frame) of this investigation and a safety defect involving lower link separation from the rear axle addressed by isuzu in safety recall 00v-058.in the case of the defect condition identified in recall 00v-058, isuzu stated that the attachment bolt could detach fully, causing separation of the lower link from the rear axle possibly creating a loss of vehicle control. isuzu also stated that this condition occurs early in the service life of the vehicle.in this investigation isuzu noted lower link separation from the frame is a progressive corrosion issue with prior warning to consumers.isuzu also stated that in the event of a lower link separation from the frame, the vehicle is still controllable and can be safely stopped. the office of defect investigation (odi) analyzed complaint data provided by isuzu and america honda motor company, inc (honda), as well as vehicle owner questionnaires submitted to odi from consumers.in total, there were 60 unique reports of lower link separations from the frame including 1 alleged crash and 7 loss of vehicle control incidents that may be related to the alleged defect.most of these complaints indicated that there was no warning prior to the link separation.this preliminary evaluation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis (ea09-018) to further assess the scope, frequency and risk to motor vehicle safety of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles.
EA09018ISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA12/07/2009REAR SUSPENSION LOWER LINK FAILURE
 During preliminary evaluation pe09-030, isuzu motors america, inc (isuzu) noted two primary differences once the rear suspension lower link separation occurs between the alleged defect (separation of the lower link from the frame) of this investigation and a safety defect involving lower link separation from the rear axle addressed by isuzu in safety recall 00v-058.in the case of the defect condition identified in recall 00v-058, isuzu stated that the attachment bolt could detach fully, causing separation of the lower link from the rear axle possibly creating a loss of vehicle control. isuzu also stated that this condition occurs early in the service life of the vehicle.in this investigation isuzu noted lower link separation from the frame is a progressive corrosion issue with prior warning to consumers.isuzu also stated that in the event of a lower link separation from the frame, the vehicle is still controllable and can be safely stopped. the office of defect investigation (odi) analyzed complaint data provided by isuzu and america honda motor company, inc (honda), as well as vehicle owner questionnaires submitted to odi from consumers.in total, there were 60 unique reports of lower link separations from the frame including 1 alleged crash and 7 loss of vehicle control incidents that may be related to the alleged defect.most of these complaints indicated that there was no warning prior to the link separation.preliminary evaluation pe09-030 has been upgraded to an engineering analysis to further assess the scope, frequency and risk to motor vehicle safety of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles.
SUSPENSION - REAR
EA09018ISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA12/07/200910/15/2010Rear Suspension Lower Link Detachment10V436000
 On september 22, 2010, isuzu manufacturing services of america, inc (isuzu) submitted a defect information report (nhtsa recall 10v-436) to the national highway traffic safety administration affecting approximately 120,000 model year (my) 1998-2002 isuzu rodeo and honda passport vehicles and my 2002 isuzu axiom vehicles originally sold, or currently operated, in the following states:connecticut, delaware, the district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia and wisconsin. all vehicle owners will receive the recall notification.vehicles 10 years of age or younger will be provided with a free remedy.for vehicles older than 10 years, isuzu will offer a free remedy provided the vehicle is presented to an isuzu service facility or a honda dealer (as applicable) no later than twelve (12) months after the date of mailing of the notification letter to the owner.the report describes a condition where vehicles operated in states using certain road deicing materials may exhibit excessive corrosion which may result in the left or right rear suspension lower link bracket becoming detached from the frame.according to isuzu a detached lower link may affect vehicle handling and potentially cause a crash.the office of defects investigation (odi) analyzed complaint data and found that 114 of the 115 (99%) alleged complete lower link separations from the frame occurred in vehicles originally sold or operated in a state covered by the recall. of these complaints 2 involved alleged crashes and 21 involved alleged loss of control incidents.the alleged crashes and loss of control incidents all occurred in vehicles operated in a state covered by the safety recall.isuzu's recall instructs dealers to inspect the rear suspension lower link bracket area to determine if corrosion is present.for vehicles in which corrosion has damaged the lower link bracket area and affected its connection to the vehicle frame, a reinforcement bracket will be installed.for vehicles with no visible signs of corrosion, dealers with apply anti-corrosion material to reduce the likelihood of corrosion developing in the future. based on isuzu's safety recall, this engineering analysis is closed.a copy of the recall may be assessed on nhtsa's website using the reference number above.
PE09030ISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA06/16/200912/08/2009REAR SUSPENSION LOWER LINK FAILURE
 During preliminary evaluation pe09-030, isuzu motors america, inc (isuzu) noted two primary differences once the rear suspension lower link separation occurs between the alleged defect (separation of the lower link from the frame) of this investigation and a safety defect involving lower link separation from the rear axle addressed by isuzu in safety recall 00v-058.in the case of the defect condition identified in recall 00v-058, isuzu stated that the attachment bolt could detach fully, causing separation of the lower link from the rear axle possibly creating a loss of vehicle control. isuzu also stated that this condition occurs early in the service life of the vehicle.in this investigation isuzu noted lower link separation from the frame is a progressive corrosion issue with prior warning to consumers.isuzu also stated that in the event of a lower link separation from the frame, the vehicle is still controllable and can be safely stopped. the office of defect investigation (odi) analyzed complaint data provided by isuzu and america honda motor company, inc (honda), as well as vehicle owner questionnaires submitted to odi from consumers.in total, there were 60 unique reports of lower link separations from the frame including 1 alleged crash and 7 loss of vehicle control incidents that may be related to the alleged defect.most of these complaints indicated that there was no warning prior to the link separation.this preliminary evaluation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis (ea09-018) to further assess the scope, frequency and risk to motor vehicle safety of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles.
EA09018ISUZU MANUFACTURING SERVICES OF AMERICA12/07/2009REAR SUSPENSION LOWER LINK FAILURE
 During preliminary evaluation pe09-030, isuzu motors america, inc (isuzu) noted two primary differences once the rear suspension lower link separation occurs between the alleged defect (separation of the lower link from the frame) of this investigation and a safety defect involving lower link separation from the rear axle addressed by isuzu in safety recall 00v-058.in the case of the defect condition identified in recall 00v-058, isuzu stated that the attachment bolt could detach fully, causing separation of the lower link from the rear axle possibly creating a loss of vehicle control. isuzu also stated that this condition occurs early in the service life of the vehicle.in this investigation isuzu noted lower link separation from the frame is a progressive corrosion issue with prior warning to consumers.isuzu also stated that in the event of a lower link separation from the frame, the vehicle is still controllable and can be safely stopped. the office of defect investigation (odi) analyzed complaint data provided by isuzu and america honda motor company, inc (honda), as well as vehicle owner questionnaires submitted to odi from consumers.in total, there were 60 unique reports of lower link separations from the frame including 1 alleged crash and 7 loss of vehicle control incidents that may be related to the alleged defect.most of these complaints indicated that there was no warning prior to the link separation.preliminary evaluation pe09-030 has been upgraded to an engineering analysis to further assess the scope, frequency and risk to motor vehicle safety of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles.

Consumer Complaints

Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
SUSPENSION
06/06/20112400001
 Lost control of vehicle with no warning on the freeway during rush hour .. general motors / isuzu / honda recall said it is the bracket detaching from the frame . it is not . the bracket pulled a piece of frame from my vehicle . the frames of these vehicles are the problem not the bracket . the bracket is in excellent condition as well as the weld to the piece of frame which was tore from the rest of the frame . these frames are collapsing , rusting out far before their time . nhtsa & transport canada both need to open an new investigation into the frames of these vehicles & what's in them , production & testing of the frames . general motors also did not offer me a fair price for my vehicle and treated me in a terrible manner . it is still not resolved after 1 year & 4 months , nothing has been resolved !!! nhtsa & transport canada need to investigate these frames ! *tr
06/06/2011240000
 Lost control of vehicle with no warning on the freeway during rush hour .. general motors / isuzu / honda recall said it is the bracket detaching from the frame . it is not . the bracket pulled a piece of frame from my vehicle . the frames of these vehicles are the problem not the bracket . the bracket is in excellent condition as well as the weld to the piece of frame which was tore from the rest of the frame . these frames are colapsing , rusting out far before their time . nhtsa & transport canada both need to open an new investigation into the frames of these vehicles & whats in them , production & testing of the frames . general motors also did not offer me a fair price for my vehicle and treated me in a terrible manner . it is still not resolved after 1 year & 4 months , nothing has been resolved !!! nhtsa & transport canada need to investigate these frames !
09/07/2012100000
 Tl* the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the vehicle was taken to the dealer for service when the contact was advised that both side mounting brackets were corroded. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and confirmed that the contact's vin qualified for repairs under nhtsa campaign id number:10v436000 (suspension:rear) but the recall campaign had already expired. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 100,000 and the current mileage was 104,492.
09/07/2012100000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the vehicle was taken to the dealer for service when the contact was advised that both side mounting brackets were corroded. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and confirmed that the contact's vin qualified for repairs under nhtsa campaign id number:10v436000 (suspension:rear) but the recall campaign had already expired. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 100,000 and the current mileage was 104,492. kmj
09/07/2012100000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated while at the the dealer they confirmed both side mounting brackets were corroded. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and they confirmed the vin qualified for repairs under nhtsa campaign id number:10v436000 (suspension:rear) but the campaign was expired. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 100,000 and the current mileage was 104,492. rds
09/05/2012150000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that while performing regular service, the mechanic test drove the vehicle and noticed that the rear end was shaking. the vehicle was inspected and the mechanic determined that the rear frame and stabilizer bar were corroded. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. the approximate failure and current mileage was 150,000. pmb
09/05/2012150000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that while performing regular service, the mechanic drove vehicle and the rear end was shaking. the vehicle was inspected and mechanic determined there was corrosion on the rear frame and stabilizer bar. the vehicle was not repaired, and cannot be repaired. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. the approximate failure and current mileage was 150,000. yn
05/27/2012140000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact was driving 10 mph when the vehicle pulled to the right abnormally. the vehicle was taken to a private mechanic where the mechanic confirmed corrosion of the driver's side rear control arm. the manufacturer was also contacted and confirmed that the vin qualified for repairs under nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 (suspension:rear) but the recall had already expired. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure and current mileages were 140,000. kmj
05/27/2012140000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact was driving 10mph when the vehicle pulled to the right of the road. the vehicle was not taken to a private mechanic. the mechanic confirmed corrosion of the drivers side rear control arm. the manufacturer was contact and they confirmed vin qualified for recall under nhtsa campaign id number : 10v436000 (suspension:rear) but the recall was expired. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure and current mileages were 140,000. rds
01/04/2012110000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the rear suspension was corroded. a local mechanic stated that the vehicle was not safe to drive. both the dealer and manufacturer were notified, but denied any assistance with repairs because the recall associated with nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension:rear), was expired. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure and current mileages were 110,000. sm.
01/04/2012110000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that there was corrosion in the rear of the vehicle, causing failure to the rear suspension. a local mechanic diagnosed that the vehicle was not safe to drive. the dealer and manufacturer were notified, but denied any assistance with repair to the nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 suspension:rear) recall, because the recall had expired. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure and current mileage was 110,000. nw
01/12/2011153000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the frame on the rear of the vehicle was rusted and corroded. in addition, when driving at least 25 mph or above, the rear end would sway abnormally. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who advised the contact that the vehicle was beyond repair and should be condemned. the manufacturer was notified who offered to buy back the vehicle from the contact. the failure mileage was 153,000. kmj
09/21/2011126000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the vehicle was included in nhtsa recall campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension:rear). the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer who stated that it was beyond repair. the contact stated that according to the recall notice, an alternate remedy would be provided if the vehicle was beyond repair. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure, but did not offer an alternative remedy. the contact was instead offered a buyout and did not accept it. the failure mileage was 126,000. the vin was unavailable. rvk
01/12/2011153000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated the frame on the rear end of the vehicle was rusted and corroded. while driving 25 mph and more the rear end sways. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated it was condemn and beyond repairs. they will not repair the vehicle and gave her back the keys. the manufacturer was notified who offered her a buy back and no other assistance. the failure mileage was 153,000. mw
09/21/2011126000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the vehicle was included in the recall associated with nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension:rear). the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer and the contact was informed that it was beyond repair. the contact stated that according to the recall notice, an alternative remedy would be provided if the vehicle was beyond repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure, but did not offer an alternative remedy. the contact was instead offered a buyout and did not want to accept the buyout. the failure mileage was 126,000. the vin was unavailable. sm.
01/12/2011153000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated the frame on the rear end of the vehicle was rusted and corroded. while driving 25 mph and more the rear end sways. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated it was condemn and beyond repairs. they will not repair the vehicle and gave her back the keys. the manufacturer was notified who offered her a buy back and no other assistance. the failure mileage was 153,000. mw
09/21/2011126000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the vehicle was included in the recall associated with nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension:rear). the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer and the contact was informed that it was beyond repair. the contact stated that according to the recall notice, an alternative remedy would be provided if the vehicle was beyond repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure, but did not offer an alternative remedy. the contact was instead offered a buyout and did not want to accept the buyout. the failure mileage was 126,000. the vin was unavailable. sm.
04/08/2011106000
 Tl - the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated the vehicle was taken to the dealer who replaced the lower brackets for recall nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 (component: suspension:rear). after the repairs the vehicle check engine light illuminated. the vehicle was taken to a local shop who diagnosed that the filler tank was ruined and the frame was completely corroded. the manufacturer was not contacted. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure and current mileage was 106, 000. pm
02/26/201191800
 Tl* the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact was driving 5 mph and while applying the brakes, the vehicle would not respond. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was discovered that the rear shock brackets were rusted and fractured from the vehicle. when the failure occurred, the brackets struck the brake lines and caused a loss of brake fluid and braking power. the mechanic repaired the brake lines but the rusted shock bracket was not repairable. the contact attempted to call both the dealer and manufacturer but was unsuccessful. the failure mileage was 91,800.
02/26/201191800
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated the brackets that hold the rear shocks rusted and broke away and hit the brake line. this caused the brake fuel to leak out and the lost of braking when trying to stop. the vehicle was taken to a mechanic shop who repaired the brake line but the rusted bracket was not repairable. the contact was trying to call the dealer and manufacturer but could not reach any one. the failure mileage was 91,800...mw
04/26/2010132800
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that a part (she was unaware of what the part was) fell from the frame while she was driving at approximately 55 mph. the vehicle was taken to a repair shop where the contact was informed that the frame was rusting. the contact recently found out the vehicle was included in recall 10v436000 (suspension:rear) but she was concerned that the safety bracket that would be installed would be inadequate as the entire frame was rusting. the vehicle had not been repaired at the time of the complaint. the vin was unavailable when the complaint was filed. the current mileage was approximately 134,000. the failure mileage was approximately 132,800-bk
08/03/201010300
 Was driving w/my handicapped daughter when the car swayed front one way back the other heard a terriible scraping noise thought i had a flat tire ,looked tires were fine looked under the car and the fram right near the gas tank broke and is complely rusted i looked and there are at least 20 complaints and isuzu does nothing about it , i think this is outrages as there could have been a fire an my daughter could have be burnt before i could get her out i don't know why the company is not held responsible and recalls are not demanded. i think that you have an obligation to do something about this condition, isuzu knowns about it as they have a 12 month warranty on corusion knowing that it won't happen that soon. i also would like to know if you intend to do somethin about this before there is some horrible accident. i now have no transportation for my child and will not have momey for a new car or a used one and i live in the country w/no transportation and have to depend on other people for dr's appt. and shopping, trips to the drug store .i find all this very unfare to everyone that owns an isuzu!!!!!!
12/04/2003350109/06/2000
 Since the purchase of my vehicle in 2000, there has been a continuous vibration in the front end as if either the tires are out of balance or the front needs aligning. i have continuously reported this to several dealers and as of this time none have been able to correct this problem..i, after being advised to, and at my own expense replaced all four tires to no avail. *jb
06/08/2003250102/28/2001
 The tires lose contact with the road when braking under rough road conditions, which makes stopping virtually impossible. the suspension components are inadequate, they fail to keep the tires on the road while encountering bumps during braking. this has been a problem since new, but recent experience has made it clear to me just how dangerous the problem actually is. i would like the problem to be addressed by isuzu - recall the suspension components and replace with something that handles bumps better.*ak
11/01/200010410/30/2000
 Vehicle is very unstable due to insufficent dampening of the supension, dealer says this there is no problem. truck will bottom out on slight bumps, and bounce up and down as if you were in a boat, the suspension parts are inferior compared to the weight of the vehicle. condition is very unsafe and could cause loss of control in certain driving situations. bounce = loss of tread contact to pavement = loss of control. all tires/points of supension (springs/shocks) have the same problem. would not reccomend this vehicle to anyone other than a pirate, as they are used to the heaving and yawing of a ship.-----------catalitic converter / engine ~ catalitic converter was glowing red one day (with the usual check engine light) jiffylube employee in the pit pointed this problem out to me, laughing and saying it was right next to the gas line, which could cause a fire. dealer replaced cat and now the truch hesitates/sputters in first gear and even more so in second gear.----------------seatbelt~on passender side binds up without provocation, limiting movement of passenger from the sholder, dealer said it was normal but it is not like the drivers side seatbelt tension that binds when there is actualy a stronger force opposing it.
05/01/2000503/01/2000
 When vehicle reaches 65-70 mph vehicle bounces all over the road, and is very hard to control. dealer blames tires for this, consumer has replaced tires 3 times plus 2 extra tires. isuzu says it is a suv, and will ride rough. vehicle taken to dealer 5 times for this problem.*ak *yh
103/03/2000
 When vehicle was coming to a stop, and just before accelerating, it jumped. dealer has attempted to repair vehicle several times ; however, the problem has not been corrected. *ak
SUSPENSION - FRONT
10/18/2010124000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that while driving approximately 40 mph the drivers rear side suspension fractured and seperated from the frame. the contact was still able to drive the vehicle. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who diagnosed the problem as needing to replace the control socket on the drivers side axle. the vehicle was repaired. the contact also stated that when filling up his tank the fuel started to pour back out of the tank. the vehicle was towed to the dealer who inspected the vehicle and informed the contact that there were holes in the gas line. the vehicle was repaired. the failure mileage was 124,000. tb
04/12/2003500908/17/2000
 I took the dealer isuzu to lemon law and i was told it works as designed. the jury was so stupid it was un believable, they all came up to my wife and i and said make sure you take the car to the dealers to get it fixed. ahhhhhhhhhhhhh isn't that why i am here in court? good luck people are stupid and we are stuck driving an unsafe care because consumer reports will not get involved. lemon cars for sale any isuzu cheap (related vehicle information: model year=2000, make=isuzu, model=rodeo). *tr
303/01/2001
 The front end of the vehicle wobbled while driving at 65 mph. the vehicle had three new sets of brake rotors, however it did not solve the problem, rear end wobbling continued. *ak *jb
05/01/2001
 We are constantly adding oil to the vehicle within a months time no oil will measure on the dipstick and there are no signs of leakage. when the truck reaches over 50mph the vehicle vibrates and pulls to the right everytime
08/26/20011009/07/2000
 Front end shakes violently at all times, vehicle is hard to operate. vehicle has been in over 5 times for same problem. isuzu representative had steering column tightened which did not remedy problem.*ak the steering freezes up at times after hitting a bump. nlm consumer states at speeds of 45 mph the back wheels vibrate up and down, they do not stay in contact with the road, the front wheels also tend to squirm left to right at these speeds, the problem tends to get worse the longer the vehicle is driven. *slc
806/20/2001
 When driving at any speed and when applying brake pedal to make a gradual stop, and when approaching an intersection or a traffic light, brake pedal traveled to floorboard, causing extended stopping distance/ brake fade away. consumer noticed shortly thereafter that brakes kicked back in. consumer has contacted dealer, dealer was unable to determine cause of problem. *ak the vehicle pulls to the right. the a/c malfunctioned. the vehicle vibrates at speed of 35 mph. the cd player failed. *yh
10/03/2000509/04/2001
 Ongoing problem with severe vbiration from front of vehicle while traveling at 52 or more mph. vehicle been in / out of dealer shop on five occasions, various parts were changed and repairs were made, but problem still keeps reoccurring. *ak
07/01/2000
 After replacing the body mounts, balancing and rotating the tires twice, replacing all 4 tires, and 3 alingments, the vehicle still pulled to the right and had front end and rear end vibrations. we prevailed at bbb arbitration and in dec. 2000 the mfg. repurchased the vehicle. *ak
SUSPENSION - FRONT - SHOCK ABSORBER
04/30/2000104/01/2000
 Shocks no gas charge in front right, weak in rf. lr. rr. weak causes extreme body roll suv. bottums out over small bumps dealer contacted looked for leaks none did not pull off shock to check i am in process of finding after market replacement, this will cause an accident if not corrected.*ak
SUSPENSION - REAR
08/01/20121
 2000 isuzu rodeo. attorney writes on behalf of client in regards to denied vehicle claim *tgw the attorney stated his client was not given the proper alternatives regarding the vehicle. the attorney stated, his client was not provided with an acceptance or rejection letter, nor was she advised what the offer was based upon. the dealer refused to release the vehicle to the consumer. the attorney stated isuzu wrote a letter stating, they closed the file. the vehicle. recall # 10v436000. *jb
06/01/201201
 Please re-open nhtsa campaign 10v436000 a safety issue such as this should never have a recall expiration date. this is my only vehicle, i live 1 and a half hours away from an isuzu dealership (was told i could only go to an isuzu dealership to get this fixed) was also told this is an all day repair and no loaner car would be given.
01/01/20121
 2000 isuzu rodeo. law office writes in regards to consumer and case involving isuzu rodeo recall 10v-436 *tgw in december 2011, the consumer delivered her vehicle to the dealer pursuant to the recall for repair. however, in january 2012, after inspection and testing by the dealer, the consumer was informed the vehicle would not be repaired as it was unsafe. the dealer retained possession of the vehicle. when the consumer requested the return of her vehicle, the dealer refused to relinquish possession. the dealer offered the consumer $2,100. the resale value of the vehicle was $5,261. the dealer presented a take it or leave offer while retaining possession of the vehicle. despite repeated attempts and protest, the issue is still ongoing. *jb
05/01/20121
 2000 isuzu rodeo. consumer sent correspondence regarding complaint sent to department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection concerning warranty agreement and falsely performed repairs *tgw the consumer was informed by a body shop, that the chassis was rusted and had holes on the back end of both sides of the chassis. the body shop stated the dealer only replaced parts, instead if replacing the entire chassis. the consumer believed the chassis was already damaged when the dealer inspected the vehicle, but they failed to disclose the information. the consumer referenced recall # 10v436000
07/12/2011105000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the vehicle was included in the recall under nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 (suspension:rear). the vehicle was taken to the dealer for the recall repairs. the technician stated the bracket that supports the coil springs to the frame was extremely corroded. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and informed the contact the repairs would not be covered under the recall. the vehicle was not repaired. the vin was not available. the approximate failure mileage was 105,000. ds
07/02/2011167000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated the vehicle was taken into the dealer for nhtsa recall campaign id number: 10v436000 (suspension rear) that did not fix the failure. the contact stated the vehicle cannot be driven. the contact uses the vehicle to tow and it can no longer be used. the vin was available. the failure mileage and current mileage were 167,000.rl
04/13/2011100000
 Tl* the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the rear of the frame exhibited excessive rust. the contact took the vehicle to the dealer to have the vehicle repaired under nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 (suspension:rear) and was advised that the vehicle was unsafe to drive because of the rust. the manufacturer was contacted regarding the failure and stated that they would only repair the lower link brackets which was covered under the recall. the failure mileage was 100,000.
03/19/2011122079
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. while the contact was driving approximately 20 mph, she heard a popping noise outside of the vehicle. the contact noticed that the rear driver's side lower bracket detached causing damage to the frame. the vehicle was towed to an authorized dealer for a recall repair associated with nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension: rear). the lower link bracket was replaced under the recall; however, the damaged frame was not included in the remedy. the dealer was notified and they would not accept liability for the frame repair. the failure mileage was 122,079. js
04/13/2011100000
 Tl* the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the rear of the frame exhibited excessive rust. the contact took the vehicle to the dealer to have the vehicle repaired under nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 (suspension:rear) and was advised that the vehicle was unsafe to drive because of the rust. the manufacturer was contacted regarding the failure and stated that they would only repair the lower link brackets which was covered under the recall. the failure mileage was 100,000.
03/19/2011122079
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. while the contact was driving approximately 20 mph, she heard a popping noise outside of the vehicle. the contact noticed that the rear driver's side lower bracket detached causing damage to the frame. the vehicle was towed to an authorized dealer for a recall repair associated with nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension: rear). the lower link bracket was replaced under the recall; however, the damaged frame was not included in the remedy. the dealer was notified and they would not accept liability for the frame repair. the failure mileage was 122,079. js
04/13/2011100000
 Tl* the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that the rear of the frame exhibited excessive rust. the contact took the vehicle to the dealer to have the vehicle repaired under nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 (suspension:rear) and was advised that the vehicle was unsafe to drive because of the rust. the manufacturer was contacted regarding the failure and stated that they would only repair the lower link brackets which was covered under the recall. the failure mileage was 100,000.
03/19/2011122079
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. while the contact was driving approximately 20 mph, she heard a popping noise outside of the vehicle. the contact noticed that the rear driver's side lower bracket detached causing damage to the frame. the vehicle was towed to an authorized dealer for a recall repair associated with nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension: rear). the lower link bracket was replaced under the recall; however, the damaged frame was not included in the remedy. the dealer was notified and they would not accept liability for the frame repair. the failure mileage was 122,079. js
12/20/2010
 Tl*the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact was driving approximately 10 mph in the driveway, and heard a loud popping noise outside of the vehicle; suddenly the rear end of the vehicle collapsed to the ground. the vehicle was towed to an independent auto repair shop where they stated that the rear mounting point bracket fractured. the technician performed a temporary fix. there was a recall related to the failure under nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension: rear). the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for inspection. the vin was included in the recall; however, they advised that the recall remedy was not necessary. the contact stated the vehicle exhibited the identical failure as mentioned in the recall and the vehicle should be repaired. the failure mileage and vin were unknown.
12/20/2010
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. while in the driveway, the contact was driving approximately 10 mph, and heard a loud popping noise outside of the vehicle and suddenly the rear end of the vehicle collapsed to the ground. the vehicle was towed to an independent auto shop where they informed that the rear mounting point bracket fractured. the technician performed a temporary fix. there was a recall related to the failure under nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 (suspension: rear). the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for inspection. the vin was included in the recall; however, they advised that the recall remedy was not necessary. the contact stated the vehicle exhibited the identical failure as mentioned in the recall and the vehicle should be eligible for the repair. the failure mileage was unknown. js
03/27/2011123000
 Tl*the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. the contact stated that she received nhtsa campaign id number 10v436000 suspension:rear in december of 2010, and that the dealer was unable to perform the repair in december, because the part was not available. on march 27, 2011 while driving 25 mph the vehicle pulled to the right. the contact had to drive onto the road side and have the vehicle towed to the dealer. the towing company advised the contact that the rear axle failed. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure and current mileage was 123,000.
11/30/20091
 2000 isuzu rodeo. consumer states rear bracket was rusted to the extent that it detached from the frame and vehicle was not drivable *tgw the consumer stated the vehicle was taken to a junk yard, because no business wanted to risk repairing it, because they stated it would most likely happen again and they didn't want to be liable. a year later, the consumer received a recall notice regarding the same failure. *jb
12/20/201097000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. while driving approximately 35 mph the contact heard a clicking sound coming from the rear of the vehicle. the contact received a recall notice (nhtsa campaign id number: 10v436000 component: suspension:rear). the vehicle was taken to the dealer for inspection after the recall notice was received. the technicians stated the brackets on the suspension would have to be replaced. the manufacturer was contacted and stated they would not provide a rental. also the manufacturer stated the parts would be available in january but did not provide an exact date. the approximate failure mileage was 97,000. ds
12/15/2010130000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2000 isuzu rodeo. while recall 10v436000, suspension:rear was being performed by the dealer the contact was advised that he would have to pay for the upper links to be repaired. he called the manufactured and was also advised that he would have to pay for the upper links for the recall. he was also advised by the dealer that they could not weld the upper links and he would have to take the vehicle to an auto welder. the contact stated the dealer wanted him to sign a release stating he was aware of the upper link failure. the vehicle was still at the dealer. the failure mileage was 138,000. vwb
11/04/2010132765
 While driving aprox 40 mph lost control of vehicle, got to the side of road and proceeded aprox 1-2 miles to local mechanic driving 5mph on the side of the road. mechanic looked at vehicle and stated the entire rear of vehicle was rusted so bad that it was actually completely broke through on one side and the other side was about to brake through as well. he stated it could not be repair and said if i had been driving 65 miles an hour i could have been killed.
01/17/2010153000
 Severe rust found under vehicle, specifically rear end. shock mounts broke off frame while normal driving. rewelding only offers temporary relief. dangerous condition. rust destroying all metal parts of undercarriage.
05/02/2010140000
 Owner of a 2000 isuzu rodeo, right rear (2009) suspension lower linc component rusted and broken off. causing uncontrolable stearing while driving ... (june 2010) left rear suspension lower linc component rusted and broken off. causing uncontrolable stearing while driving this vehicle.
06/05/201089900
 I was driving down a local road (approximate speed 40mph). after hitting an average bump in the road the vehicle went out of control. it thrashed side to side several times before crashing into a ditch and landing onto its side. i had no explanation for the cause of the crash. however, when the tow truck arrived he showed us a large rusted out part that was hanging down in front of the drivers side rear wheel (i took pictures as well as the police).
05/01/2009150000
 It has been determined by an certified mechanic that there is rust in the rear suspension that has caused the vehicle to fail inspection which is not due to normal wear.
05/25/2009900001
 2000 isuzu rodeo was not in an accident, but the rear suspension components are so rotted that it appears the vehicle is teetering in the brink of a catastrophic failure. its my understanding that there is an open investigation by nhtsa and consumer complaint blogs are rife with complaints about this condition. my vehicle is an easy vehicle to sell, not able to be fixed, and undrivable because of this defect, and isuzu (or honda) should be held accountable for those of us who have 4000 lb unsafe paper weights in our driveways. *tr
10/09/2009952761
 The events leading up to the failure are simple. leaving our driveway and within two tenths of a mile there was a rear suspension lower link failure on our isuzu rodeo just as described in nhtsa action pe09030. here are the actions / moments leading up to the failure. we simply gathered in our rodeo. pulled from our driveway on to a rural country road. single lane and traveling a speed of approximately 10mph (luckily). it is on this road and with in two tenths of a mile from leaving our home the failure occurred. there was no warning whatsoever. when the failure occurred there was a loss of control, the rear end of the vehicle began swerving from left to right in a track about 3 feet from the original line of travel. because we were not yet on a major highway, stopping the vehicle was no problem and there was no crash, however, we can't bare the thoughts of what it could have been if we had been traveling at highway speeds. again, luckily we were very close to home. towing the vehicle was not necessary as we were able to slowly back the vehicle in reverse to our home at nothing more than an idling speed. the nature of the failure is the left rear suspension bar breaking from the frame of the vehicle. there has been no repair attempted as the frame is in no condition to remount the suspension bar. after this incident we have looked more at the condition of frame on this vehicle. there are other places on the frame were there is total rust through. because of the incident and because of what we are now seeing we deem the frame unsafe. *tr
10/23/2000710/01/2000
 Vehicle has a vibration(shake or whopple) in driver and front passenger seat. front passenger seat has a bad vibration when driving with speed of 50mph or more. has been to the dealership numerous times with this complaint and contacted isuzu twice, tires have been rotated and balanced, rims changed, hub assembly replaced, and wheel bearings repacked. we have now been told from their customer realtion representative that this is a normal ride for this vehicle. we would like the district service representative to be contacted and drive our vehicle if possible.*ak

Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Based on public records. Inadvertent errors are possible.
This web site is not associated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by and has no official or unofficial affiliation with the vehicle's manufacturer.