Recalls


CampaignManufacturerManufacturing dateType# of units affectedDate Owner notified MfgRecall Initiated byManufacturers of recalled vehicles/productsReport Recieved DateRecord Creation DateRegulation Part NumberFMVSS Number
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL - ACCELERATOR PEDAL
09V388000TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. V (Vehicle)426031910/08/2009MFRTOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION10/05/200910/06/2009
Defect SummaryToyota is recalling certain model year 2004-2010 passenger vehicles. the accelerator pedal can get stuck in the wide open position due to its being trapped by an unsecured or incompatible driver's floor mat.
Consequence SummaryA stuck open accelerator pedal may result in very high vehicle speeds and make it difficult to stop the vehicle, which could cause a crash, serious injury or death.
Corrective SummaryToyota filed an amended defect report on november 25, 2009, stating that dealers will modify the accelerator pedal and, on certain vehicles, alter the shape of the floor surface under the pedal. these changes address the risk of pedal entrapment due to interference with the floor mat. redesigned accelerator pedals will become available beginning in april 2010 and dealers will replace any modified pedal with the new pedal if desired. also, dealers will replace any genuine toyota or lexus all-weather floor mats with redesigned all-weather mats, or repurchase the previous mats from owners who do not want the new ones. additionally, software modifications will be installed on camry, avalon and lexus es 350, is 350 and is 250 models that will ensure that the brake overrides the accelerator in the event both brake and accelerator pedals are applied. toyota will begin mailing letters to owners in december 2009. owners may contact toyota at 1-800-331-4331, lexus at 1-800-255-3987.
NotesToyota recall no. 90l/90lg.owners may also contact the national highway traffic safety administration's vehicle safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (tty 1-800-424-9153), or go to http://www.safercar.gov .

Investigations


NHTSA IDManufacturerDate openDate closeSubjectRecall campaign
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
RQ10003TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION02/16/2010UNINTENDED ACCELERATION
 On september 26, 2007, toyota filed a defect information report and notified nhtsa that some of its model year (my) 2007 and 2008 lexus e350 and toyota camry vehicles could experience unintended and uncontrolled acceleration due to interference between the optional all weather floor mat offered on those vehicles and the vehicles' accelerator pedal.this decision was influenced by an office of defects investigation (odi) engineering analysis.this recall was designated 07e082.two years later, on october 5, 2009, toyota filed a defect information report and notified nhtsa that a number of its my 2004-2009 lexus and toyota vehicles may also experience unintended and uncontrolled acceleration due to interference between the accelerator pedal and the driver's floor mat.this recall was designated 09v388.several months later, on january 27, 2010, toyota filed an amended, or supplemental, defect information report and expanded the population of vehicles to include additional my 2008-2010 toyota and lexus vehicles.since this expansiontook place in a different calendar year, this recall was designated 10v023.separately on january 21, 2010, toyota filed a defect information report and notified nhtsa that certain toyota vehicles and certain pontiac vibe vehicles contained a safety defect in the accelerator pedal assembly that may cause the accelerator pedal to become harder to depress, slower to return, or in the worse case, mechanically stuck in a partially depressed position.nhtsa designated this recall 10v017.in total, the four recalls cover over 7.6 million toyota and lexus vehicles as well as the pontiac vibe product made by new united motor manufacturing, inc., a venture of toyota and general motors corporation.nhtsa requires additional information from toyota to more fully understand and evaluate, among other things, whether the scope of the recalls identified above (makes, models and model years) is sufficiently broad.the agency is seeking to determine whether toyota viewed the underlying defects too narrowly as interference between the accelerator pedal and the driver
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL - ACCELERATOR PEDAL
RQ10003TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION02/16/2010UNINTENDED ACCELERATION
 On september 26, 2007, toyota filed a defect information report and notified nhtsa that some of its model year (my) 2007 and 2008 lexus e350 and toyota camry vehicles could experience unintended and uncontrolled acceleration due to interference between the optional all weather floor mat offered on those vehicles and the vehicles' accelerator pedal.this decision was influenced by an office of defects investigation (odi) engineering analysis.this recall was designated 07e082.two years later, on october 5, 2009, toyota filed a defect information report and notified nhtsa that a number of its my 2004-2009 lexus and toyota vehicles may also experience unintended and uncontrolled acceleration due to interference between the accelerator pedal and the driver's floor mat.this recall was designated 09v388.several months later, on january 27, 2010, toyota filed an amended, or supplemental, defect information report and expanded the population of vehicles to include additional my 2008-2010 toyota and lexus vehicles.since this expansiontook place in a different calendar year, this recall was designated 10v023.separately on january 21, 2010, toyota filed a defect information report and notified nhtsa that certain toyota vehicles and certain pontiac vibe vehicles contained a safety defect in the accelerator pedal assembly that may cause the accelerator pedal to become harder to depress, slower to return, or in the worse case, mechanically stuck in a partially depressed position.nhtsa designated this recall 10v017.in total, the four recalls cover over 7.6 million toyota and lexus vehicles as well as the pontiac vibe product made by new united motor manufacturing, inc., a venture of toyota and general motors corporation.nhtsa requires additional information from toyota to more fully understand and evaluate, among other things, whether the scope of the recalls identified above (makes, models and model years) is sufficiently broad.the agency is seeking to determine whether toyota viewed the underlying defects too narrowly as interference between the accelerator pedal and the driver

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
08/06/2012399601
 On monday august 6th, 2012 at approximately 5: 25 am, i ([xxx]) was arriving at work at methodist hospital. i pulled in the parking lot and started to make a wide u turn into a parking stall driving about 5 miles per hour. my car suddenly accelerated and the brakes would not work and i was unable to stop the vehicle. i kept trying to brake to no avail. i went through a fence and drove over a steel pole. just as i was about to hit a very large tree, the car finally stopped. the brakes finally work about 3 to 4 feet in front of the tree. i was able to drive around the tree and park like i do every day. after parking, i got out of the vehicle, got my phone from my purse in the trunk and called my husband and told him what had just happened. i was very shaken and crying. the car was wrecked on the passenger side. [xxx] called security & [xxx] came over. we both went back out where the accident happened. i showed him where it happened, what happened and where i ended up. [xxx] told a few photos. we have contacted lexus [xxx] #2 option (judy)and our attorney ([xxx]) [xxx]. we have taken the vehicle to lexus of omaha. lexus wants us to sign a black box release. our attorney suggest we turn in a claim to see if farmers wishes to see the black box 1st.. information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr
05/07/201229000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2009 lexus es350. the contact was reversing from a residential garage. as the brakes were applied and the contact shifted from reverse to drive, the vehicle abnormally accelerated. the contact crashed into a brick wall and sustained injuries to the left leg. the crash caused damaged the contact
01/22/201115807
 When i was going to park my car in the box in front of the hotel room, i touched the accelerator slightly to advance the two meters distant to be properly parked, then the accelerator run in high speed the brakes did not respond. to reduce the impact, i turned the wheel to the right and crashed into the hotel wall. people from lexus is making an investigation. the question is how confident is that investigation. the car was check the day before for 15,000 miles check. i live now in durango, mexico and just came to have my car checked.
10/09/2010
 Tl-the contact owns a lexus es 350. the contact stated that the driver was turning into a parking space when the vehicle suddenly accelerated, jumped a curb and hit a parked vehicle. there was a minor injury as a result of the accident (someone in another vehicle). the vehicle had previously been repaired according to recall 09v388000 (vehicle speed control:accelerator pedal). a police report was filed. the contact filed a complaint with the manufacturer who stated that someone would get back with him. the contact was currently awaiting the call back. the vehicle had not been repaired at the time of the complaint. the current and failure mileages were unknown-bk
02/25/201032001
 I am requesting that dot nhtsa investigate the driver's contribution to unintended acceleration (ua) due to programming code error. i am driving at 40 mph. i see signal light turning red. i took my foot off accelerator. the car is coasting. when speed reached 20 mph, the car suddenly started accelerating. i stepped on the brake. car started slowing down. i reported this to lexus headquarter on 03-01-10 (lexus incident.) i was asked to drop off my car at dealer on 03-30-2010 so that field technical specialist can investigate. i was asked to pick up my car on 03-31-10. i requested copy technicians findings and report. as per technician's report, we were able to duplicate his concern. what is happening is that as the vehicle slows down the torque converter lock up is turning off. this reduces the amount of engine braking and gives the feeling that the vehicle has sped up. we compared this to another es350 and it has the same characteristics. no repairs made, vehicle is operating as designed. i wrote lexus head-quarter again saying, this is not a feeling i experienced. it is a real issue. i noticed speedometer reading rising. i received a phone call from lexus headquarter indicating there is nothing more they can do. i asked, can your technician repeat the test with me in the car with him?. they said, it is not necessary. since my foot was not on accelerator or brake when car started accelerating, i suspect programming code error. my car was already repaired during safety recall by lexus some two months ago. so, this is not a stuck accelerator issue. i request your assistance in having lexus repeat this test with me inside the car to witness their test. they have refused to do this. car was purchased brand new from sterling mccall lexus, houston in december 08. it is lexus 2009, es 350. car is barely used since we bought it 16 months ago. it has 3,300 miles on it. all routine required maintenance was performed by dealer. *tr
02/09/201028000
 Tl*the contact owns a 2008 lexus es350. on february 9, 2010, while the contact was attempting to change gears with his foot on the brake, the vehicle suddenly accelerated. he attempted to slow the vehicle down by depressing the brake pedal with both feet but the vehicle did not stop and collided into a wall. the driver was not injured but the passenger did sustain injuries to the mouth and upper body. a police report was filed. the current and failure mileages were approximately 28,000.
09/27/2009200
 My wife and i experienced an uncontrollable runaway of our new (3 weeks old and less than 200 miles) lexus es-350 car on 09/27/2009. the car was totaled. at time, both police and ambulance were called. and we were sent to the nearby shady grove hospital for checkup and treatments. initially, i thought it could be because i mistakenly pressed the gas pedal, instead of the brake, when i tried to slow down the car preparing to make a left-hand turn onto rt. 28. now, after i read all the recent toyota/lexus accident news reports, which specifically involved the lexus es series, i begin to belief it wasn't the case. and in fact, it was an uncontrollable runaway car, at the time. because otherwise i would have naturally slowed down the car at the intersection and prepared to make the turn. therefore, i shouldn't be the one who contributed to the accident; also considering the following:(1) i'm an experienced driver, and have driven all kind of brand and sizes of cars, and under various weather and road conditions since 1962; (2) the accident happened on the great sceneca hwy in gaithersburg. i've been living in this specific area since 1974; and going through all the community changes and expansions, including new road structures, and traffic patterns; (3) i've a superior driving record; and a 20/20 vision.
03/15/20101
 Gas pedal got stuck on a recalled lexus leading to a crash, after the recall work was done by the dealership. *tr
11/25/20092000
 Tl*the contact owns a 2009 lexus es350. while the contact was attempting to pull out of a parking space she applied the brakes and the vehicle suddenly accelerated without warning. in order to stop the acceleration the contact had to apply hard pressure to the brake pedal. the vehicle was taken to the dealership where the contact was informed that the floor mat caused the acceleration and they were replaced. the vin was not available.the failure mileage was at 2000 and the current mileage is 4800. the vin was unavailable.
02/19/2010450001
 My vehicle lexus es350 (2009) is under recall for safety as it gas pedal is getting stuck in some cases. i had difficult time for lexus to take care and to fix this problem. but i want to report that lexus does still not own its responsibility. i had called lexus on feb 19, 2010, to check on the status of the recall repair. i was told: car is safe to drive and that
02/27/20103000
 Tl*the contact owns a 2009 lexus es350. the contact stated he took his vehicle in for the remedy on the entrapment pedal and he did not realized that they would shortened the accelerator pedal. he is disappointed in the results and what they did to the pedal he is not comfortable driving the vehicle. the toyota manufacturer and dealer did not inform him of exactly what the fix would be on the vehicle. the toyota manufacturer inform him that nhtsa said it was acceptable for them to cut the accelerator pedal off. the dealer also stated they cannot modify the pedal. the failure mileage was 3,000.
02/24/201011500
 Tl*the contact owns a 2009 lexus es350. the contact was driving approximately 30 mph entering the highway. a sudden increase of acceleration caused the speed to increase to over 60 mph. the brakes were depressed and the vehicle slowed down. the vehicle continued in operation. the vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. the contact is waiting on a response from the dealer for the cause of failure. the manufacturer was notified. the failure mileage was 11,500.
05/20/2009450001
 2009 lexus es-350 had sudden acceleration which was out of control in may 2009. i had brought this car back to lexus dealership at southfiled, mi who said it was not an issue. *tr
11/09/20098780
 Tl* the contact owns a 2009 lexus es350. at a stop sign he slightly released the brake and slightly pressed the accelerator pedal, but the vehicle had suddenly lurched forward. he was able to safely avoid a crash. the vehicle has not been diagnosed by the dealership. the current and failure mileages were 8780.
09/30/200911890
 Tl*the contact leased a 2009 lexus es350. while driving approximately 35 to 40 mph on the highway, the vehicle accelerated 80 to 90 mph. he attempted to engage the brake pedal and the emergency brake to stop the vehicle and was unsuccessful. he also pressed the on/off button, shift the vehicle in reverse and was unable to stop the vehicle. he was able to drive with minimal control to an emergency lane where he was able to shift the vehicle into reverse then immediately to park; however, the transmission began smoking and the vehicle slowed down. the contact drove the vehicle to his residence. he was also able to drive the vehicle to the dealer and expects them to allow him to return the vehicle. the service director stated that the failure was caused by the floor mats and that the hooks were never installed in the vehicle. the manufacturer provided no assistance. the current mileage was approximately 11,900 and the failure mileage was also approximately 11,890.
08/23/20095001
 Lexus es 350 had uncontrolled accelerator causing speeds in excess of 90 miles per hour until car was forced out of gear. without attempts to accelerate the car took over and sped out of control. cruise control was not engaged and brakes would not slow the vehicle. i called 911 and they told me to put the car in neutral which caused the rpms to race out of control. the car then went into reverse by itself until i slammed it into park. the dealer came and picked up the car as it was unsafe to drive. fortunately this occurred on the freeway and i had room to maneuver and miss cars and obstacles. had this occurred anywhere else i would be in the hospital. *tr
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL - ACCELERATOR PEDAL
12/01/20101
 2009 lexus 350. consumer writes regarding lexus recall floor mat interference with accelerator pedal and change to computer for engine shut down *tgw the consumer was not satisfied with the recall modifications that were performed. the consumer also stated the floor mats were not replaced as he was told they would be. the consumer stated the pedal was too short and his foot could slip off the end and become lodged under the pedal. *jb
02/23/201021000101/01/2009
 2009 lexus es350, vehicle accelerated. *bf the consumer stated he accelerated to pass another vehicle and when he removed his foot from the accelerator, the vehicle accelerated up to 80 mph, before it resumed normal operation. the vehicle was repaired under recall on march 26, 2010. the consumer stated the vehicle is still not operating correctly.*jb
01/02/20101
 2009 lexus 350. consumer states brake failure which causing a multi car accident. *tgw the consumer stated he applied the brakes, but the vehicle did not stop and subsequently he hit another vehicle. the consumer stated he did receive a recall notice. *jb
08/28/20091
 On august 28, 2009, four occupants of a 2009 lexus es350 tragically and unnecessarily died in santee, california in san diego county following a high speed loss of control and rollover event. the vehicle in question was a loaner car from bob baker lexus in el cajon, california. driver of the vehicle, 45, a 19 year veteran of the california highway patrol. the driver had obtained the vehicle that day after dropping off his lexus for service. witnesses report that the officer was maneuvering the lexus in and out of traffic at high rates of speed on state route 125, honking his horn with the hazard lights on, prior to the highway ending at an intersection. the officer attempted to negotiate a turn but could not avoid striking another vehicle and losing control because of his high rate of speed. the vehicle lost control, rolled several times, and caught fire. all four occupants are reported to have died almost immediately. prior to entering the intersection, an occupant of the vehicle called 911 emergency to report that the accelerator was stuck. he reported that the vehicle was traveling 120 miles per hour and that they were approaching an intersection. occupants are heard telling each other to pray before a woman screams and the call suddenly ends. the officer(driver of the vehicle, his wife , 45, and their 14 year old daughter all died in the crash. the wife's brother, 38, also died. on behalf of the surviving family members of the decedents, we respectfully request you to investigate why this lexus vehicle's accelerator malfunctioned, and why a highly-trained officer and driver like the officer was unable to re-gain control of the lexus vehicle at issue or otherwise avoid catastrophe. we currently are awaiting additional facts surrounding the incident, and the malfunction of the lexus, but will supplement this complaint upon receipt. *tr updated 12/01/09 *bf updated 06/03/10*bf