Lincoln Mkz 2008

Model Mkz made in 2008 by Lincoln got 28 consumer complains there are 4 investigations as well as 4 service bulletins. Consumer complaints with reference, among others things, to air bags, digital instrument panel and engine. Technical service bulletines regarding engine and engine cooling, power train and steering. The car had some investigations: tires, vehicle speed control. The car has one 3.5 engine.

Model 2008

Engine [L]CylindersTransmissionDriveEstimate MPG (city/highway/combined)Unadjusted MPG (city/highway/combined)FuelFuel costClassRelease date
3.5 6Lockup/automatic, 6 gears417/24/1920.6/33.3/24.8679Regular2209MIDSIZE CARS16-Jul-07
3.5 6Lockup/automatic, 6 gearsF18/28/2222.6/39.6/28.0113Regular1911MIDSIZE CARS16-Jul-07

Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING - ENGINE
TSB-10-16-108/09/201010039155Ready07/12/2011
TSB-10-16-108/09/201010039155Ford: there may be a rough idle or misses while the malfunction light is on. there are mutliple possible trouble codes stored. *rm07/12/2011
POWER TRAIN - MANUAL TRANSMISSION
TSB-07-21-1110/01/200710032244Ford/mercury/lincoln: some vehicles equipped with a 6f50 transaxle , with any output shaft speed (oss) sensor or turbine shaft speed (tss) sensor diagnostic trouble code(s) (dtcs) p0715, p0717, p0720, p0721, p0722 and/or harsh engagements,02/25/2010
STEERING - HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST - HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS
071312/01/200707251410021218Power steering fluid leaks from steering rack and pump attachment joints. *kb updated 2/27/08. *nj03/23/2007

Investigations


NHTSA IDManufacturerDate openDate closeSubjectRecall campaign
TIRES - VALVE
PE08060FORD MOTOR COMPANY10/14/200804/09/2009TIRE VALVE CRACKING
 On october 14, 2008, odi opened pe08-060 to investigate allegations of cracked and leaking snap-in tire valves in model year (my) 2007 vehicles manufactured by ford motor company.the valves were supplied to ford by topseal auto-parts, a subsidiary of the shanghai baolong automotive corporation in china.valves made by topseal for aftermarket sale were the subject of two recent safety recalls by tech international (08t-018) and dill air controls (08t-028), the latter of which was investigated by odi in pe08-036 and ea08-022.the defect conditions addressed by the aftermarket tire valve recalls both involved inadequate resistance to ozone cracking due to issues with the supply of anti-ozonant chemicals to topseal for a period from july to mid-november 2006.the aftermarket valves were compounded with a blend of epdm and natural rubber, using a relatively low percentage of epdm (epdm provides inherent resistance to ozone cracking).hence, the need for anti-ozonant chemicals and the problems with cracking when those chemicals were missing or out of specification in some lots of valves.both recall campaigns involved inspection programs to identify and replace valves with visible surface cracking.although the topseal valves supplied to ford also appear to have been affected by the anti-ozonant supply issues in mid to late-2006, ford indicated that its valves were made at a different topseal production line and were compounded with a higher percentage of epdm rubber to meet more stringent specifications from ford.odi's analysis of complaint and warranty data provided by ford showed that problems with cracked tire valves were significantly higher for my 2007 vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007.ford responded by implementing changes in its material specifications for snap-in rubber tire valves and also increasing the quality and acceptance standards for valves imported for use in its vehicles.while the complaint and warranty claim rates are elevated for subject vehicles produced from december 2006 through march 2007, the rates of leaking valves are well below one percent of production for each of the peak months for all of the affected models.a substantial majority of the subject vehicles are equipped with tire pressure monitoring systems (tpms) which warn the driver when any tire pressures drops below 25 percent of recommended inflation pressure. as outlined in a letter to odi dated april 6, 2009, ford has agreed to send letters to owners of certain my 2007 and 2008 ford, lincoln and mercury vehicles to provide information about the cracking concern. letters will be sent to owners of vehicles built from november 2006 through may 2007.owners can opt for a free dealer inspection.valves exhibiting surface cracks or air leakage related to ozone attack will be replaced by ford under its normal warranty terms.ford expects to send the letter by approximately mid-may 2009. based on the use of tpms in the majority of subject vehicles and the relatively low rates of repairs associated with leaking valves and resultant tire damage, odi believes that the actions ford has agreed to take will provide effective and expeditious resolution for vehicles that were built during the period when valves with inadequate resistance to ozone cracking were most likely to have been used in vehicle production.further investigation of this matter would not be an efficient allocation of agency resources.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist.the agency will continue to monitor complaints and other information relating to the alleged defect in the subject vehicles and take further action in the future if warranted.
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
EA12009Ford Motor Company12/12/2012Accelerator Pedal Interference
 Unsecured mats may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle.a heel blocker in the floor pan provides a platform that may lift an unsecured mat into contact with the pedal.ford introduced new pedals as a running change early in model year (my) 2010 vehicles.analysis of complaints received by odi and ford show elevated rates of pedal entrapment incidents in my 2008 through early 2010 production vehicles.incidents typically occur following hard pedal applications to pass slower traffic or when merging into faster traffic.drivers allege continued high engine power after releasing the accelerator pedal and difficulty braking, including reports that the incident was controlled by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off.drivers and service technicians reference observing evidence of mat interference or note unsecured ford or aftermarket all weather floor mats in post-incident inspections.this investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis on my 2008 through early-2010 vehicles (produced through september 2009) to further assess the scope, frequency and safety consequences of the alleged defect.the voqs associated with the opening of this engineering analysis are:10479693, 10415911, 10379562, 10372674, 10345830, 10342572, 10339330, 10335336, 10334211, 10332233, 10331160, 10329659, 10327597, 10320011, 10232027, 10214131
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL - ACCELERATOR PEDAL
PE10019Ford Motor Company05/28/201001/11/2013Accel Pedal Interference - Acc Floormat
 Unsecured mats may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle. a heel blocker in the floor pan provides a platform that may lift an unsecured mat into contact with the pedal. ford introduced new pedals as a running change early in model year (my) 2010 vehicles. analysis of complaints received by odi and ford show elevated rates of pedal entrapment incidents in my 2008 through early 2010 production vehicles. incidents typically occur following hard pedal applications to pass slower traffic or when merging into faster traffic. drivers allege continued high engine power after releasing the accelerator pedal and difficulty braking, including reports that the incident was controlled by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off. drivers and service technicians reference observing evidence of mat interference or note unsecured ford or aftermarket all weather floor mats in post-incident inspections.based on information gathered during the preliminary evaluation the population being investigated has been narrowed to model years 2008 to 2010.this investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis on my 2008 through early-2010 vehicles (produced through september 2009) to further assess the scope, frequency and safety consequences of the alleged defect.the voqs associated with the opening of this engineering analysis are: 10479693, 10415911, 10379562, 10372674, 10345830, 10342572, 10339330, 10335336, 10334211, 10332233, 10331160, 10329659, 10327597, 10320011, 10232027, 10214131
EA12009Ford Motor Company12/12/2012Accelerator Pedal Interference
 Unsecured mats may interfere with accelerator pedal return to idle.a heel blocker in the floor pan provides a platform that may lift an unsecured mat into contact with the pedal.ford introduced new pedals as a running change early in model year (my) 2010 vehicles.analysis of complaints received by odi and ford show elevated rates of pedal entrapment incidents in my 2008 through early 2010 production vehicles.incidents typically occur following hard pedal applications to pass slower traffic or when merging into faster traffic.drivers allege continued high engine power after releasing the accelerator pedal and difficulty braking, including reports that the incident was controlled by shifting to neutral or turning the engine off.drivers and service technicians reference observing evidence of mat interference or note unsecured ford or aftermarket all weather floor mats in post-incident inspections.this investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis on my 2008 through early-2010 vehicles (produced through september 2009) to further assess the scope, frequency and safety consequences of the alleged defect.the voqs associated with the opening of this engineering analysis are:10479693, 10415911, 10379562, 10372674, 10345830, 10342572, 10339330, 10335336, 10334211, 10332233, 10331160, 10329659, 10327597, 10320011, 10232027, 10214131

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
AIR BAGS
12/15/200922458
 Tl* the contact owns a 2008 lincoln mkz. the contact was driving approximately 25 mph on icy road conditions. the vehicle loss control and crashed into a brick wall. the frontair bag system failed to deploy with the massive impact. the driver sustained major injuries. the police and ambulance were called to the scene. the vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic. there was an estimated amount of $13,000 in damages to the vehicle. the failure mileage was 22,458. js
DIGITAL INSTRUMENT PANEL
01/01/19011
 2008 lincoln mkz. consumer writes regarding unresolved driver distractions *tgw the consumer stated the displays on the message center such as the odometer, compass and radio are unreadable on a reasonably bright day without serious prolonged distraction from the roadway. the consumer stated there is no illumination control to increase visibility and the display surfaces are glossy, easily reflecting nearby images. *jb
ENGINE
10/06/2012375001
 I was proceeding down a ramp to enter highway traffic. i put my foot to the floor to merge into traffic and the vehicle continued to accelerate even after i took my foot off the gas. i put my foot on the brake and the vehicle continued to accelerate. i was unable to slow down to any great extent as the engine was racing. the accelerator pedal seem to be off the floor ( not stuck to the floor ) at the time. i would estimate that my speed was 85 mph when i put the shifter into neutral and stopped the car in the breakdown lane. at this time the engine was revving so high, i thought for sure the engine would blow. before i had the presence of mind to shut the engine off, the engine stopped revving and went back to an idle. the brakes were smoking but there did not seem to be any other damage. i checked the floor mat and it was not near the accelerator pedal. we were on vacation at the time and about 600 miles from home so i continued the to drive but not putting the gas pedal to the floor. i took the vehicle to the lincoln dealer three days later and they found no codes and nothing that would allow the accelerator to stay stuck. the invoice indicates that they performed koeo, koer, and oasis and all systems passed. *tr
10/06/201237500
 I was proceeding down a ramp to enter highway traffic. i put my foot to the floor to merge into traffic and the vehicle continued to accelerate even after i took my foot off the gas. i put my foot on the brake and the vehicle continued to accelerate. i was unable to slow down to any great extent as the engine was racing. the accelerator pedal seem to be off the floor ( not stuck to the floor ) at the time. i would estimate that my speed was 85 mph when i put the shifter into neutral and stopped the car in the breakdown lane. at this time the engine was reving so high, i thought for sure the engine would blow. before i had the presence of mind to shut the engine off, the engine stopped reving and went back to an idle. the brakes were smoking but there did not seem to be any other damage. i checked the floor mat and it was not near the accellerator pedal. we were on vacation at the time and about 600 miles from home so i continued the to drive but not putting the gas pedal to the floor. i took the vehicle to the lincoln dealer three days later and they found no codes and nothing that would allow the accelerator to stay stuck. the invoice indicates that they performed koeo, koer, and oasis and all systems passed.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
11/18/201015700
 The brake and gas pedals on my lincoln mkz are located so close to each other and at the same height that i have twice experienced acceleration instead of braking when putting on the brakes because i did not move my foot enough to clear the gas pedal. i have inquired to my dealer about making an adjustment to the brakes pedal height or spacing but was advised that this could not be done. this design is an accident waiting to happen and i am lucky that in both instances i was able to react in time to avoid one. if this has not already been brought to the attention of the manufacturer, nhtsa should do so before someone is seriously hurt.
STRUCTURE
02/28/200914000102/28/2009
 Tl*the contact owns a 2008 lincoln mkz. the contact stated that when driving the sunlight reflection combined with the contrast from the instrument control panel impaired his visibility. the vehicle was taken to a dealer and a technician added a black covering for the instrument panels surface. the failure mileage was 14,000. the current mileage was 19,000. updated 11/10/09 *bf updated 11/13/09.*jb
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
10/06/2012375001
 I was proceeding down a ramp to enter highway traffic. i put my foot to the floor to merge into traffic and the vehicle continued to accelerate even after i took my foot off the gas. i put my foot on the brake and the vehicle continued to accelerate. i was unable to slow down to any great extent as the engine was racing. the accelerator pedal seem to be off the floor ( not stuck to the floor ) at the time. i would estimate that my speed was 85 mph when i put the shifter into neutral and stopped the car in the breakdown lane. at this time the engine was revving so high, i thought for sure the engine would blow. before i had the presence of mind to shut the engine off, the engine stopped revving and went back to an idle. the brakes were smoking but there did not seem to be any other damage. i checked the floor mat and it was not near the accelerator pedal. we were on vacation at the time and about 600 miles from home so i continued the to drive but not putting the gas pedal to the floor. i took the vehicle to the lincoln dealer three days later and they found no codes and nothing that would allow the accelerator to stay stuck. the invoice indicates that they performed koeo, koer, and oasis and all systems passed. *tr
11/18/201015700
 The brake and gas pedals on my lincoln mkz are located so close to each other and at the same height that i have twice experienced acceleration instead of braking when putting on the brakes because i did not move my foot enough to clear the gas pedal. i have inquired to my dealer about making an adjustment to the brakes pedal height or spacing but was advised that this could not be done. this design is an accident waiting to happen and i am lucky that in both instances i was able to react in time to avoid one. if this has not already been brought to the attention of the manufacturer, nhtsa should do so before someone is seriously hurt.
01/18/2010144000
 Tl*the contact owns a 2008 lincoln mkz. while driving 30 mph the vehicle accelerated. the contact attempted to engage the brake pedal; however, the vehicle did not slow down. the contact was forced to use the emergency brake; yet, the vehicle slowed down slightly and did not stop completely. the contact made a right turn, engaged the emergency brake again and forced the gear shift into park to stop the vehicle. the vehicle was towed to a lincoln dealer. the dealer diagnosed the vehicle and stated that there was nothing wrong with it. the dealer wanted the contact to ride with him during a test drive and the contact didn't feel safe in the vehicle. the contact no longer wants the vehicle. the manufacturer should be responsible for any damages that might occur while driving the vehicle. the failure mileage was 14,400. updated 03/04/10 *bf
VISIBILITY
02/28/200914000102/28/2009
 Tl*the contact owns a 2008 lincoln mkz. the contact stated that when driving the sunlight reflection combined with the contrast from the instrument control panel impaired his visibility. the vehicle was taken to a dealer and a technician added a black covering for the instrument panels surface. the failure mileage was 14,000. the current mileage was 19,000. updated 11/10/09 *bf updated 11/13/09.*jb
WHEELS
05/17/201241800
 Tl-the contact owns a 2008 lincoln mkz. the contact stated that the chrome on all four wheels was flaking off and as a result the aluminum was causing lack of tire pressure. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated there was no recall and offered no assistance. the manufacturer was notified who referred him to the dealer for inspection. the vehicle was taken back to the dealer who sealed the rims as a temporary remedy. the failure mileage was 41,800. pmb
05/17/201241800
 Tl-the contact owns a 2008 lincoln mkz. the contact stated the chrome on all four wheels was flaking off and as a result the aluminum was causing lack of tire pressure. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated there was no recall and offered no assistance. the manufacturer was notified who informed him to take the vehicle back to the dealer for inspection. the dealer was taken back to the dealer who seals the rims and returns it back to the contact. the contact sold the vehicle after the dealer repaired the wheels. the failure mileage was 41,800. mw
06/28/2012416001
 Tire wheel rims have chrome lifting off resulting in low tire pressure. lost 10 percent tire pressure in 30 days. *tr
06/28/201241600
 Tire wheel rims have chrome lifting off resulting in low tire pressure. lost 10 percent tire pressure in 30 days.

Car dealers selling


StateCityZipNamePhone
CASan Bernardino92412Fairview Ford Sales Inc.8849261
FLFort Myers33907Sam Galloway Ford Inc.936-2193
HIHonolulu96817Honolulu Ford Inc.532-1700
HIKahului96732Valley Isle Motors Ltd
ORRoseburg97470Lithia Rose-FT Inc.
CTWOODBRIDGE06525CREST LINCOLN MERCURY203-389-7100