Mazda Cx9 2012
Model Cx9 made in 2012 by Mazda got 8 consumer complains as well as 1 service bulletin. Consumer complaints with reference to exterior lighting. . Technical service bulletines regarding service brakes, air.
Model 2012
Bulletins
| Bulletin | Bulletin date | Replacement Bulletin | Item no. | Summary | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - ANTILOCK | |||||
| 04-002-12 | 03/31/2012 | 10044148 | Mazda: clunk/bang noise during first forward movement after sitting. this is a normal operating noise of the anti-lock brake system (abs). do not attempt any repairs. also included model cx-5 year 2013; model cx-9 years 2012-2013; model mia | 05/15/2012 | |
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | |||
| 06/05/2012 | 10 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2012 mazda cx9. the contact stated that the headlights would provide more than 15 feet of illumination unless the highbeams were turned on. the contact had taken the vehicle to the dealer twice and the contact was told there was nothing wrong with the headlights. the vin was not available. the failure mileage was 10 and the current mileage was 8,100. kmj | |||
| 06/05/2012 | 10 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2012 mazda cx9. the contact stated that the head lights do not give more then 15 feet of vision unless the high beams are turned on. the contact had taken the vehicle to the dealer twice and was told there was nothing wrong with the headlights. the vin was not available. the failure mileage was 10 and the current mileage was 8,100.rl | |||
| 12/21/2011 | |||
| Both my tail lights form condensation. i contacted both the dealer and the corporation several times. the corporation maintains this is a normal occurence that comes and goes depending on the weather conditions. consequently they don't consider this a warranty issue, as a result they won't do anything to remedy the problem. the service manager from the dealership informed me that they use to replace the faulty unit until mazda refused to reimburse them. their excuse seems to be absurd considering the unit should be sealed. | |||