Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| STRUCTURE - BODY | |||
| 11/15/2010 | 32000 | ||
| Tl* the contact owns a 2010 mazda mazda 5. the contact stated that while driving approximately 65 mph, there was an excessive vibration coming from the rear of the vehicle. the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer and two different mechanics for diagnosis. the technicians stated that the failure was related to a defective frame. in addition, the defect caused both rear tires to prematurely wear. the rear tires had been replaced twice with new tires. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 32,000. | |||
| 11/15/2010 | 32000 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2010 mazda mazda 5. the contact stated that while driving approximately 65 mph, there was an excessive vibration coming from the rear of the vehicle. the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer and two different mechanics for diagnosis. the technicians stated that the failure was related to a defective frame. in addition, the defect caused both rear tires to prematurely wear. the rear tires had been replaced twice with new tires. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 32,000. sm. | |||
| 11/15/2010 | 32000 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2010 mazda 5. while driving approximately 65 mph, there was an excessive vibration coming from the rear of the vehicle. the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer and two different mechanics for diagnosis. the technicians stated the failure was related to a defective frame. in addition, the defect caused both rear tires to prematurely wear. the rear tires had been replaced twice with new ones. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the problem. the approximate failure mileage was 32,000. js | |||