Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
010280312/18/200310005669Malfunction indicator light (mil) illumination with diagnostic trouble code (dtc) p0507 stored in memory. various models including the mp3, and mazdaspeed 2001-2003. *tt03/10/2004
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - BATTERY
010250407/21/200410009427Battery test procedure requirements. *tt09/29/2004

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
05/15/20070309/25/2001
 Vehicle: 2001 mazda protege lx 2.0 liter engine failure: key is inserted in ignition and turned, starter will turn over but engine will not start. occurrence: intermittently, 3 times in 2 months. service: had it towed each time to a certified mazda dealership. first time - they replaced the ignition coils with another vehicles coils and it started right up. they put the original coils back in and it started up fine. second time - they replaced the pcm third time - had it towed to a different mazda dealership. after towing, the vehicle started right up. i have had the vehicle serviced at regular intervals as recommended by mazda since i purchased it new 6 years ago. i have been in contact with mazda corporation to check for recalls or known issues and was told there are none for my vehicle. after explaining my problem to them, i was given no suggestions for recourse. this problem is intermittent, but leaves me with an unreliable vehicle. *tr
05/28/2004403/21/2002
 Last november the check engine light came on in my 2001 mazda protege. i immediately brought it to the mazda dealership, who said that their was an error with the code and they cleared it and recalibrated it. they said it had gone off for no apparent reason. three months later (shortly after the warranty expired) the light came on again. this time the dealership claimed that the code said that the gas cap was not screwed on tight. this was not true! when that light came on i immediately checked the gas cap since the owners manual told me that was all i could do myself (it was tight as a drum). the dealership claimed otherwise-it was my word against theirs and naturally they won. two weeks later the light again came back on. when i took it back to the dealership, they told me that the code this time said my solenoid was bad (the car was running great). the charged me $427 to replace it and said i should have no more problems. another couple of weeks goes by and the light again goes off. this time they kept it in the shop for 3 days. they claimed that the code indicated it was the solenoind (how could that be since it was a brand new one?) they cleared the code and test drove it for 50 miles, it did not come back on. i believe that the computer controlling that light is defective and giving out erroneous codes since i know that my gas cap was securely tightened, and how code it point to the solenoid after it had been replaced with a new one. the dealership will not refund those repair bills and the mazda customer service would only refer me back to the dealership. they did not want to hear any statements from me about a possibly defective part. told me to get an independent auto repair person's assessment. i cannot afford that! please look into this for me. the dealership did tell me that i'd never be able to get my car smogged with that light on and i can't live with running back and forth to the shop every time it goes off. *la
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - WIRING
05/14/200668000109/17/2001
 I was at a local restaurant when they announced a mazda protege was on fire in the parking lot. fire department and police were called. fire was put out and fire department looked to find source of fire. i was told it was electrical. it started in the wiring at the left rear door. the fireman asked what was in the trunk (meaning highpowered amps). i told him everything in the car was original. no added equipment. he said that the only time he had seen a fire in the electrical system like mine was as a result of overload from added speaker/ amps. my mazda 2001 protege is being totaled by farmers insurance but they will not have it investigated as to the failure. mazda has been informed and opened a case but will not do anything without the insurance company's investigation. i am now out a car that should have lasted me ten years or more. i have had no problems with this car until the fire. if the insurance companys refuse to investigate then how do we, the consumer, know when we are in danger. what recourse do i have with either my insurance company or with mazda. *nm