Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
SUSPENSION
98309204/01/1998603599Engineering is investigating vehicles which exhibit a pull to the right while driving condition. *tt02/25/1999
SUSPENSION - FRONT
98309202/25/1998607381Exhibiting a pulls to the right while driving condition. *tt09/21/1999
SUSPENSION - REAR
1499306/01/2001622804Some vehicles produced through july 1999 may exhibit rear suspension spring failure with no resulting operational concern. *tt10/23/2001

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
SUSPENSION
01/04/1999
 When driving at any speed vehicle vibrates within the steering column and in the engine. *ak
SUSPENSION - FRONT
210/09/1999
 Consumer stated that first time 2 new tires were needed at 19,022 miles, mechanic said no problem with rear suspension, problem due to lack of rotation, second time 4 new tires were needed at 26,851 miles mechanic said problem with struts and coils for excessive tire wear. repeated complaints to ford dealer ignored. *yd
SUSPENSION - FRONT - CONTROL ARM
05/22/20001
 Ball joints without oiling grease zerk fittings which caused the ball joints to crack/break due to lack of lubrication. dealer notified. *ak the rubber boots around the ball joints are deflated with no zerks to insert grease. *yh
SUSPENSION - FRONT - SPRINGS - COIL SPRINGS
08/27/20032
 Consumer complained about having problems with a right tie rod and a right coil spring. he had taken vehicle to a repair shop and was told by a mechanic what was wrong with the vehicle. vehicle was real dangerous to be driven. manufacturer was not contacted at the time of this call. dealer was contacted and replaced the damaged parts with the warranty. vehicle had less than 30000 miles. *ak
SUSPENSION - MULTIPLE AXLE
04/19/199910/28/1997
 While driving vehicle started pulling to the right after several alignments had been done and set of tires had been replaced twice. *ak
SUSPENSION - REAR
11/30/20051
 Dt: the contact took vehicle to dealer for regular maintenance, and the dealer discovered the rear passenger strut broke. inside the strut was a piece of rubber. no repairs have been made. *ak
SUSPENSION - REAR - SPRINGS
09/30/2004830001
 Rear coil spring fractured, without provocation, in my 1998 mercury tracer sedan. after speaking to 3 different independent shops and 2 different ford service departments, it was absolutely clear that ford/mercury has a known material defect that they have chosen to ignore. everyone concedes that these springs are failing at absurd rates but fomo co policy is to deny everything (despite what their own service technicians are admitting) catastrophic failures while driving frequently result in tire blowouts... this problem occurs throughout the taurus/sable, escort/tracer, and topaz/contour car lines... i still have the shattered spring in my possession, fomoco expressed zero interest when i contacted them...
12/17/2001106/01/1998
 Broken rear coil springs at very low mileage,could have caused tire blowouts,serious accident.*ak
12/17/2001106/01/1998
 Broken rear coil springs at very low mileage, could have caused blowouts, serious accident. *ak
SUSPENSION - REAR - SPRINGS - COIL SPRINGS
02/16/200408/26/2001
 The rear coil springs broke on my 1998 mercury tracer. when seeking a repair, i understand that this is a well documented problem with ford/mercury models of this size (escort/tracer/tempo). with rear springs broken, one can observe the rear tires of a car with these springs broken come off the road. with ford well aware of this design flaw in these autos, there ought to be a recall of these vehicles. i have only 47,700 miles on this car; i have now replaced a busted crankshaft pulley and the resistor associated with circulation system which could have started a fire. all of these problems are well documented and ford should address these flaws.
1
 During a vehicle inspection rear coil springs broke and were replaced. *ak