Bulletins
| Bulletin | Bulletin date | Replacement Bulletin | Item no. | Summary | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEAT BELTS - FRONT - BUCKLE ASSEMBLY | |||||
| 170601 | 04/20/2005 | 170601R | 626926 | Information regarding seat belt latch slides to the lower seat belt anchor. *yh updated *eh | 12/20/2001 |
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEAT BELTS | |||
| 04/26/2000 | 0 | ||
| Seatbelt is fastened under the hip, and it's like t shape design. seat belt pinches consumer in the side, to the point that is really hard to get buckle unloosened. in an accident it may be hard to get out of vehicle. *ak | |||
| SEAT BELTS - FRONT - ANCHORAGE | |||
| 1 | 08/15/2000 | ||
| While traveling 40 mph on snow while trying to slow down consumer ran off road .air bags did not deploy with front end damage. *ak the seat belt not adquately restrain the driver. *yh | |||
| SEAT BELTS - FRONT - BUCKLE ASSEMBLY | |||
| 08/01/2005 | 57000 | 1 | 07/06/2004 |
| Wife was driving our 2001 subaru forester. she got too close to edge of paved surface on narrow secondary road and tires dropped off edge. instead of there being the required flat shoulder or berm, there is a 4+ inch drop at that point. the drop and correcting to the roadway caused her to lose control and the vehicle ended up rolling two or three (witness accounts varied) times and ending upright in a field. during the very first rollover my wife was aware of the seat belt coming unlatched. obviously, she then became an object being tossed about in the vehicle during the rest of the crash sequence. there is no evident, physical damage to the belt or buckle mechanism. the inertia lock still functions; the belt will click into the buckle and remain there with a tugging motion is applied. obviously i can not duplicate the type of forces that were applied during the crash. i contacted subara of america at their customer service dept with this information and they would only look into this in the event the insurance company seeks to subrogate the claim to them. this will not happen as the seatbelt did not cause the accident (for collision loss part of claim) and pennsylvania law does not allow subrogation for medical claims. i was not seeking a litigation settlement in contacting subaru... i thought it would be something they would want to investigate before someone was killed. *jb | |||
| SEAT BELTS - FRONT - RETRACTOR | |||
| 2 | 08/01/2000 | ||
| Brakes lightly applied due to slush on roadway,brakes did not work vehicle crashed, driver suffered concusion as head hit windshield and air bags did not depoly. seat belt did not hold driver firmly. subaru home office notified, chris, customer service rep appears not very concerned and almost callous in response to our concerns. ins co has elected to further investigation the vehicle. *ak | |||
| 01/06/2001 | 1 | 08/01/2000 | |
| Aotomobile skidded of road d/t snow/slush stopping in culvert. damage to front end considered substantial. air bags did not deploy and seat belt apparently did not hold occupant since her head hit the windshield. she was transported to local er. the fact that the airbags did not depoly impressed the police and emts at the accident site.*ak | |||