Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
VISIBILITY - WINDSHIELD WIPER/WASHER
0901200309/01/200310016486Washer nozzles-may encounter poor discharge from the left front windshield washer. *sc09/13/2005

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
VISIBILITY - DEFROSTER/DEFOGGER SYSTEM - WINDSHIELD - BLOWER
02/04/2003319010/08/2002
 Heater and defroster failure
VISIBILITY - GLASS, SIDE/REAR
10/05/20041
 The consumer hit her garage door with the vehicle breaking the rear hatch window. however, when the glass broke, it broke into pieces and did not disintegrate. the glass company came out and explained to her that the glass had not gone through the proper processing, and that it was not safe. please provide any further information. *jb
VISIBILITY - POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS
09/23/200327800508/24/2002
 This vehicle posed a serious safety problem because the vehicle only had one key hole, but had five doors, the consumer was able to access the vehicle through the drivers side door/key hole. once the consumer was in the vehicle a lock pad on the door allowed for entry through the other doors, or a key remote. the consumer's lock pad also didn't work temporarily so the consumer couldn't open the hatch. the manufacturer and the dealer had not been notified of the problems. *jb the remote entry device did not work temporarily so the consumer had to gain access with the key to the only hole on the driver's door, but then the power locks failed so the consumer had no way to open the hatchback. there was no release for the vehicle. the air bag light was on and needed a new harness to re-fix the problem and the odometer along with the speedometer failed immediately after the consumer had taken ownership. *scc the consumer also stated there was a problem with the power windows *jb
VISIBILITY - WINDSHIELD
09/13/2004305/10/2003
 The windshield has required three replacement since the purchase of the car. the first two replacements resulted in noise emanating from the top-center of the windshield by the rear view mirror. the third replacement of the windshield involved the dealership, and the result so far has been positive. although, in order for the installer to insure that the noise was halted, he had to apply more pressure when setting the windshield as well as use a high performance sealant. the result of these procedures will result in the next windshield replacement, when it becomes necessary, to be a difficult one and with no guarantee that the noise will not come back! *ak
09/13/20043
 Dealership replaced three times the windshield due to cracks. *ak
03/06/20036000209/15/2002
 A rock hit my windshield and within 5 min there was a crack across the entire bottomof the glass, radiating down into the heating element. $975. ne year later, another rock hit the windshield and another crack resulted in exactly the same position. is there a flaw in the subaru glass? i will have this one replaced with after market glass without the heating element. $632 . *ak