Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
11/27/200469000105/15/2004
 I was driving on the 22 east on nov 27 '04 930 am. about 6 seconds before i changed lanes, their was a 3 second their was a sprinkle of rain. i changed lanes and noticed a stoped car about 330 feet in front of me, while traveling at 60. i aplied my foot on the brake and i slid with brakes locked. i then repressed the brakes and again slid with brakes locked. i then removed the pressure and noticed that the brakes didn't unlock. i then aplied and removed my pressure trying to unlock the brakes, before hitting the car. my car is sitting waiting for repair.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK
07/15/2001106/01/2001
 Driver was trying to park the car, thus the car was travelling at very low speed. car suddenly surged after the driver applied the brake. car went over the cement tire stopper, up a small hill, hit a wall, and stopped. this cannot possibly have been caused by the driver hitting the accelerator pedal. this is a serious safety problem. we will contact the dealer and the manufacturer on july 16, 2001. *ak
0
 Consumer's vehicle was traveling about 55mph on and another vehicle veered into it. consumer applied brakes, and anti- lock braking system didn't kick in. dealership was aware of problem.*ak
 I visited several toyota dealers because i am helping a friend in bying a new corolla. despite i advise her to include the safety fetaures: side airbags and abs no dealear make them available if not increasing the lease by 50% (while the increase in value is about 10%) and asking to wait 3 months. making so practically impossible to have them. some dealers reached the point to say that those items are not available on the corolla. such a behaviour it is not acceptable. car manufacturers are supposed to promote the sensibility toward safety not to boycott it.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS
12/17/2001
 Brake failure while driving 60 mph; brake pedal was applied, but vehicle did not stop, instead it lost control and was involved in a frontal collision. dealer was not notified at this time. feel free to provide any further information.*ak
07/19/2001207/16/2001
 Stepped on the brakes, but they failed to stop, airbag also failed, brakes fade to the floor, resulted in hitting another vehicle. air bag did not open.
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DIFFERENTIAL PROPORTIONAL VALVE
507/01/2000
 Very excessive front brake pad wear. i have replaced the front brake pads 5 times in 16000 miles. i have replaced the proportioning valve which did not solve the problem. i have also replaced and adjusted the rear brake shoes which did not solve the problem. *ak
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - PADS
03/16/200225600108/05/2000
 Front braking system. had to replace front brake pads at 25600 and 42200 miles. rear pads do not seem to be wearing at all, indicating proportion valve problem or poor design. toyota dealer just shrugs shoulders.*ak
507/01/2000
 Very excessive front brake pad wear. i have replaced the front brake pads 5 times in 16000 miles. i have replaced the proportioning valve which did not solve the problem. i have also replaced and adjusted the rear brake shoes which did not solve the problem. *ak
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DRUM
507/01/2000
 Very excessive front brake pad wear. i have replaced the front brake pads 5 times in 16000 miles. i have replaced the proportioning valve which did not solve the problem. i have also replaced and adjusted the rear brake shoes which did not solve the problem. *ak
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS
02/10/2001
 Engine check light came on. dealer checked, but found nothing. on february 17, 2001 dealer dis covered that fuel hoses had been improperly assembled at factory. *ak