Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
STRUCTURE
12/26/2006155005010/09/2006
 Tl* - the contact owns a 2006 toyota matrix. the contact stated that this vehicle was low to the ground, which made it easier for pebbles to strick the windshield which sustained damage from gravel being kicked up by other vehicles on the highway. the contact stated that he normally drove 45 to 55 mph highway limit when the vehicle got pelted by the gravel. the gravel was a result of the sand and chemicals placed on the road to improve icy conditions. there was usually snow and ice on the road from november to april. the current and failure mileage were 15500. *ak updated 03/19/07. *jb
STRUCTURE - FRAME AND MEMBERS
05/22/2009215001
 My 2006 toyota matrix has developed extreme cupping of the tires at 21, 000 miles despite regular rotations at 5,000, 10,186, and 14,722 miles. i had begun to notice a change in the sound of the tires at 21,500 miles. my mechanic refused to rotate the tires at 21,981 miles saying something was wrong with the struts thus causing extreme wear on the tires. i went to the las cruces toyota in new mexico where i purchased the car but they said nothing was wrong and refused to replace struts or provide new tires. many complaints about this problem related to the toyota matrix has been posted on the consumer review site for edmunds.com. toyota refuses to address the problem. *tr
07/17/2008150001
 I have about 15500 miles on a 2006 toyota matrix that has abnormal tire wear. the head service mechanic explained to me that my car had to light of a rear end and that the tires bounce around and create abnormal wear. he stated that it would only make it worse to rotate them to the front. i have vibration and two ruined tires. toyota answers that it is a tire issue and to take it up with the manufacturer. the manufacturer states they are not responsible for tire wear. every tire installer and mechanic know about the flaw in these cars but toyota does not take responsibility for this design error. *tr