Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| STRUCTURE - BODY | |||
| 09/30/2011 | 176000 | ||
| Tl* the contact owns a 1993 toyota pickup. the contact stated that the vehicle would jerk sporadically and pull abnormally when applying the brakes. there was also rusting on the frame of the vehicle and the exterior head lights were abnormally dim. the dealer and manufacturer denied any assistance with repairs to the vehicle. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 176,000. | |||
| 09/30/2011 | 176000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 1993 toyota pickup. the contact stated that the vehicle would jerk sporadically and pull abnormally when applying the brakes. there was also rusting on the frame of the vehicle and the exterior head lights were abnormally dim. the dealer and manufacturer denied any assistance with repairs to the vehicle. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 176,000. kmj | |||
| 09/30/2011 | 176000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 1993 toyota pickup. the contact stated that the vehicle would jerk at any time. the vehicle would also pull when the brake were depressed. there was also rusting on the frame of the vehicle. the exterior head light would be dim, making it difficult to see at night. the dealer and manufacturer denied any assistance with repair the failure. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 176,000. nw | |||
| STRUCTURE - BODY - BUMPERS | |||
| 10/04/1993 | 1 | 03/19/1993 | |
| Clutch pressure plate is made of different material that is too thin, causing it to slip. *ak the spring loaded portions of the clutch pressure plate, were not of robust enough construction to withstand the frequent manual changing of gears, 13000 miles later, the same problem started to reoccur, dealer found no problems, two months later clutch failed, consumer states problem still exitsts. driver side seat belt replaced and failed within 16000 miles, passenger side seat belt looks deteriorated, consumer states the problem appears to be the mechanism which causes the belt to lock up in the case of a heavy jolt is too fragile, so when traveling on roads with heavy vibration, it repeatedly locks up and becomes too tight, cutting into consumer's neck. consumer states front suspension is of inferior stability and vehicle is easy to lose control when needing to swerve, consumer did lose control and had an accident, vehicle clipped a guardrail due to faulty suspension system, the bumper is attached to the frame by only one bolt causing it to pivot in the accident, rear springs collapsed at only 30000 miles while having only a camper shell, rear springs only have 2 small leaves to which the shocks are light weight under size, a delaer replaced the shocks because they began to leak, consumer was advised to modify the springs by adding an extra leave. *slc | |||
| STRUCTURE - BODY - DOOR | |||
| 01/03/1995 | 3 | ||
| Door switches replaced. | |||
| 04/07/1994 | 7 | ||
| Left side door trim panel replaced. | |||
| STRUCTURE - FRAME AND MEMBERS | |||
| 05/06/2011 | 204000 | ||
| Tl*the contact owns a 1993 toyota pickup. the contact stated the spring shackle that was welded to the rear frame of the vehicle, was covered with rust. the contact stated the spring shackle well also detached and it allowed the springs to hang. the contact stated the spring was dangling next to the fuel tank. the contact was concerned that the frame would completely break in half. the failure mileage and current mileages were 204,000. | |||
| 05/06/2011 | 204000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 1993 toyota pickup. the contact stated the spring shackle that is welded to the rear frame of the vehicle, has rusted through. the contact stated the spring shackle well is gone and it allows the springs to hang. the contact stated the spring is dangling nest to the fuel tank. the contact is concerned that the frame will completely break in half. the failure mileage and current mileages were 204,000.rl | |||
| 05/20/2009 | 118883 | 1 | |
| I purchased in 1993 a brand new toyota 4wd dx pickup from a toyota dealership. i have properly maintained the vehicle following all the toyota guidelines and currently the truck still looks showroom new. i have received many compliments on how nice my 1993 truck looks including many offers to purchase my vehicle. however, over the last two years my ase certified mechanic has stated to me that the frame is prematurely rusting and it is getting pretty bad. when i just recently had a tire rotation performed, he suggested that the problem has escalated and needs to be evaluated by the toyota dealership. on may 20, 2009 i had an appointment with the dealership to examine the truck frame and advise me of the situation. they explained to me that the vehicle frame was heavily corroded and perforated beyond the normal surface rust found on vehicles after years of exposure in the northeast. they further stated that the truck was probably unsafe to drive in its current state. i responded to them that i was aware that the toyota manufacturing company had a campaign to recall the toyota pickups from 1995 and up with the same problems and have been either repairing or replacing the frames of many affected vehicles. i continued by asking if toyota would resolve my problem and they stated that they would not and that i should call the toyota manufacturer customer service department and request that a case be opened and ask for assistance. i did as requested by the dealer and was told by the customer service representative that they would make a record of my complaint but that they were only resolving the pickups from 1995 and up and that in no way would they help me whatsoever. now here i am with a beautiful 1993 toyota pickup truck that would be very expensive for me to fix, is now unsafe to be driven on the road and will probably need to be picked by a tow truck and hauled away to a junkyard. *tr | |||
| 01/02/2008 | 190000 | ||
| Tl*the contact owns a 1993 toyota pickup. the contact stated that the vehicle's frame failed the manufacturer's inspection. a portion of the frame has since been repaired; however, toyota will not repair or replace the vehicle. the contact feels that the vehicle is unsafe to drive because the frame could fall apart while driving. the current mileage was 198,000 and failure mileage was 190,000. | |||
| Front cross member is falling off while driving. also vehicle has various problems, including brakes failures/electrical failures,etc. consumer is very concerned for safety. *ak | |||