Bulletins
| Bulletin | Bulletin date | Replacement Bulletin | Item no. | Summary | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||||
| 00402 | 09/16/2002 | 00402R | 10007583 | Front brake vibration. *mj *sc | 07/01/2004 |
| BR00402 | 09/16/2003 | 10003954 | Information on front brake vibration. revised. *tt | 11/07/2003 | |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS | |||||
| BR00101 | 01/12/2001 | 616656 | Information on new parking brake struts to reduce the possibility of rear brake vibration. *tt | 03/07/2001 | |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC | |||||
| BR00402 | 09/16/2002 | 635865 | Information on front brake vibration. *tt | 11/01/2002 | |
| 092302 | 09/23/2002 | 635879 | Subject regarding front brake repair service tips. *tt | 11/01/2002 | |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - PADS | |||||
| 00102 | 12/18/2002 | 10006063 | Toyota racing development (trd) high-performance brake pads. *tt | 04/14/2004 | |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DRUM | |||||
| BR00302 | 09/16/2002 | 635863 | Information on rear brake vibration. *tt | 11/01/2002 | |
| BR00600 | 11/17/2000 | 616093 | This bulletin introduces the new parking brake struts developed to reduce the possibility of rear brake vibration. *tt | 02/09/2001 | |
Investigations
| NHTSA ID | Manufacturer | Date open | Date close | Subject | Recall campaign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DIFFERENTIAL PROPORTIONAL VALVE | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES | |||
| 12/11/2012 | 101000 | 1 | |
| The 1st generation toyota tundra's are rust buckets. i own a 2001 toyota tundra w/ approx 101,000 miles. the vehicle was taken to the local authorized dealer for repairs under recall: 09v444000 (structure: frame and members:underbody shields). the vehicle is being repaired (frame is being replaced). but the dealer also informed me that the steering rack and hose connections are rotted out and in need of replacement -> $1300. additionally, the dealer informed me that the rear e-brake pivots are rusted/frozen and will also need replacing ->> $450. in a nutshell, the frame, the steering and the brakes are all rusted out - it appears that safety was an afterthought. i feel that toyota corporation is negligent and that consumers are left holding the bag for poorly engineered products that are prone to early rust-out. on-line forums are filled with threads from other owners experiencing similar issues. *tr | |||
| 12/11/2012 | 101000 | ||
| The 1st generation toyota tundra's are rust buckets. i own a 2001 toyota tundra w/ approx 101,000 miles. the vehicle was taken to the local authorized dealer for repairs under recall: 09v444000 (structure: frame and members:underbody shields). the vehicle is being repaired (frame is being replaced). but the dealer also informed me that the steering rack and hose connections are rotted out and in need of replacement -> $1300. additionally, the dealer informed me that the rear e-brake pivots are rusted/frozen and will also need replacing ->> $450. in a nutshell, the frame, the steering and the brakes are all rusted out - it appears that safety was an afterthought. i feel that toyota corporation is negligent and that consumers are left holding the bag for poorly engineered products that are prone to early rust-out. on-line forums are filled with threads from other owners experiencing similar issues. | |||
| 01/21/2005 | 80000 | 1 | |
| To whom it may concern: i am writing this letter in an effort to make toyota motors corporation responsible for the defective braking system on toyota tundras 2001 ,and probably other years,specifically the front brake calipers . from what the toyota dealerships tell me these trucks came with front calipers that are too small for the vehicle and they get too hot and as a result they warp the discs and this creates a moderate to violent shaking of the front end of the vehicle every time the brakes are applied . toyota motors repaired the issue, by installing bigger calipers with more surface area, as long as the car was within the warranty 3 years or 36,000 miles . it is my opinion that this issue should be examined and be considered a goverment recall because it is not that a part broke or got worn out before the warranty expired . it is more that the car came with brakes not capable of withstanding the heat generated by the friction b/w the pads and the disc due to the design of the caliper and as a result it warps the discs causing owners to resurface or replace discs frequently without solving the problem or solving it for a short period of time and needless to say this ,to me, is a big safety issue not only because the brakes do not work properly but also because all that shaking and vibration can loosen up other components in the suspension or braking system compromising the safety of the vehicle and as a result this may cause an accident . many disappointed tundra owners express their frustration about this issue on different forums one of them is toyota tundra forums and another is tundra solutions forum. i respectfully request revision of this problem bacause a lot of us can't afford or think that it is not fair to pay b/w $2,200- $3,200 that the dealerships and brake shops charge to solve this problem. thank you for your attention. *tr | |||
| 01/21/2005 | 80000 | ||
| To whom it may concern: i am writing this letter in an effort to make toyota motors corporation responsible for the defective braking system on toyota tundras 2001 ,and probably other years,specifically the front brake calipers . from what the toyota dealerships tell me these trucks came with front calipers that are too small for the vehicle and they get too hot and as a result they warp the discs and this creates a moderate to violent shaking of the front end of the vehicle every time the brakes are applied . toyota motors repaired the issue, by installing bigger calipers with more surface area, as long as the car was within the warranty 3 years or 36,000 miles . it is my opinion that this issue should be examined and be considered a goverment recall because it is not that a part broke or got worn out before the warranty expired . it is more that the car came with brakes not capable of withstanding the heat generated by the friction b/w the pads and the disc due to the design of the caliper and as a result it warps the discs causing owners to resurface or replace discs frequently without solving the problem or solving it for a short period of time and needless to say this ,to me, is a big safety issue not only because the brakes do not work properly but also because all that shaking and vibration can loosen up other components in the suspension or braking system compromising the safety of the vehicle and as a result this may cause an accident . many disappointed tundra owners express their frustration about this issue on different forums one of them is toyota tundra forums and another is tundra solutions forum. i respectfully request revision of this problem bacause a lot of us can't afford or think that it is not fair to pay b/w $2,200- $3,200 that the dealerships and brake shops charge to solve this problem. thank you for your attention. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR | |||
| 10/09/2002 | 95000 | 1 | 07/24/2001 |
| Just like another consumer listed i too had a failed transmission. the cost to repair was around $3,100.00. a barely 4 yr old truck should not have lost a transmission already. we own a 1970 model chev p/u that has never had a transmission. the quality of toyota has not stood up to the cost of the better manufactured vehicle. i am truly disapointed in the quality, one of the handles in the back has stripped out and is about to fall off, the back dirver's window lock has broken and flops in the wind when the window is open. i am also experiencing the very same brake shutter has other consumers and i just paid for a $450.00 brake job with new rotors and pads and still have the shutter. now after reading these other reports i am concerned about reliability of my truck.*ak | |||
| 06/06/2003 | 34000 | 0 | 07/08/2001 |
| My tundra is a 2001 and it has just under 36,000 miles. the brakes cause the front end to shake severely. i replaced the pads about a month ago but the problem seems to have gotten worse. i understand from other sites that the standard brake system for the tundra is inadequate. i'll probably just get rid of the truck instead of fighting with the dealer to have it fixed. this really muddies the toyota reputation for me. guess i'll go back to europe to get my next vehicle. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - ANTILOCK | |||
| 02/10/2008 | 35000 | 1 | 07/11/2001 |
| Brake problems. vibration in truck when using the brakes. 60,000 miles and going on second set of brakes/rotors trying to eliminate the problem. something is not right with this truck. *tr | |||
| 1 | 07/12/2003 | ||
| Consumer called complaining about brakes. dealer was contacted but did ot want to work on the vehicle.*ak | |||
| When brakes are applied between 10 and 35mph vehicle vibrates. dealer has not been able to duplicate or correct problem, however, toyota has issued a tsb about problem. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - DISC - ROTOR | |||
| 09/11/2002 | 10/18/2000 | ||
| My 2001 tundra vibrates and pulsates when braking. i have had brake pads installed and the rotors turned 3 time in the last four months. but the problem is still there. because of this problem i have been in an accident. thank god i wasn't injured. i have heard and read about other tundra owners having the same problem. when will they make toyota recall the tundra's because of the bad braking system on them? when several people loss their lives. i just it will be the ford incident all over again. *la | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, ELECTRIC | |||
| 08/17/2009 | 86125 | 1 | |
| 2001 toyota tundra rust issue 1. brake lining rusted through, lost all braking ability, i had to steer into bushes to stop, could have been very dangerous had i been driving at higher speed spent $645 on brake repair , needs more brake work do to rust issues. 2. frame is now so rusted it will not pass inspection @ 86,000 miles on truck...no response from toyota. *tr | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||
| 03/14/2005 | 91080 | ||
| Due to premature corrosion (vehicle 4 years old) parking brake failed to function, failed nys inspection, was repaired (03/14/2005). due to premature corrosion, spring broke, was repaired (01/02/2008). power steering rack rotted, had to be replaced. approx mileage 150,000. front suspenion links rotted out. called toyota (04/15/2009) voiced our concern for rotting frame, no recall at that time. they issued a complaint #.took vehicle to dealer for inspection for three recalls, a0f, b0d, 90m on 05/02/2012. inspection not properly done, chunks of rust still can be flaked off, possible holes behind, but they sprayed crc over top of the loose scaling, covering over the problems. we had no choice in what they were doing with our property. we took it in for an inspection. after said inspection, if it would not get a new frame, we would have opted to take it home, removed all loose scaling prior to the crc being applied. we were not given any options, our vehicle was already on the way to their collision shop for the work. this would have accomplished two things; the dealership would know without a doubt that there were no holes and the crc would stick directly to the frame minimizing future corrosion (that is the objective of the recall afterall) i called toyota corporate and voiced my concern with a spray covering over the problem, and the truck not being safe. my case is still pending, but based on the initial call back from the case manager, it is not looking like there will be a resolution in our favor, we will see. my concern is, how many of these toyota dealers are not thoroughly inspecting these trucks, spraying over the problems and putting these vehicles back on the roads. how safe is that? | |||
| 03/14/2005 | 91080 | ||
| Due to premature corrosion (vehicle 4 years old) parking brake failed to function, failed nys inspection, was repaired (03/14/2005). due to premature corrosion, spring broke, was repaired (01/02/2008). power steering rack rotted, had to be replaced. approx mileage 150,000. front suspenion links rotted out. called toyota (04/15/2009) voiced our concern for rotting frame, no recall at that time. they issued a complaint #.took vehicle to dealer for inspection for three recalls, a0f, b0d, 90m on 05/02/2012. inspection not properly done, chunks of rust still can be flaked off, possible holes behind, but they sprayed crc over top of the loose scaling, covering over the problems. we had no choice in what they were doing with our property. we took it in for an inspection. after said inspection, if it would not get a new frame, we would have opted to take it home, removed all loose scaling prior to the crc being applied. we were not given any options, our vehicle was already on the way to their collision shop for the work. this would have accomplished two things; the dealership would know without a doubt that there were no holes and the crc would stick directly to the frame minimizing future corrosion (that is the objective of the recall afterall) i called toyota corporate and voiced my concern with a spray covering over the problem, and the truck not being safe. my case is still pending, but based on the initial call back from the case manager, it is not looking like there will be a resolution in our favor, we will see. my concern is, how many of these toyota dealers are not thoroughly inspecting these trucks, spraying over the problems and putting these vehicles back on the roads. how safe is that? | |||
| 03/14/2005 | 91080 | ||
| Due to premature corrosion (vehicle 4 years old) parking brake failed to function, failed nys inspection, was repaired (03/14/2005). due to premature corrosion, spring broke, was repaired (01/02/2008). power steering rack rotted, had to be replaced. approx mileage 150,000. front suspenion links rotted out. called toyota (04/15/2009) voiced our concern for rotting frame, no recall at that time. they issued a complaint #.took vehicle to dealer for inspection for three recalls, a0f, b0d, 90m on 05/02/2012. inspection not properly done, chunks of rust still can be flaked off, possible holes behind, but they sprayed crc over top of the loose scaling, covering over the problems. we had no choice in what they were doing with our property. we took it in for an inspection. after said inspection, if it would not get a new frame, we would have opted to take it home, removed all loose scaling prior to the crc being applied. we were not given any options, our vehicle was already on the way to their collision shop for the work. this would have accomplished two things; the dealership would know without a doubt that there were no holes and the crc would stick directly to the frame minimizing future corrosion (that is the objective of the recall afterall) i called toyota corporate and voiced my concern with a spray covering over the problem, and the truck not being safe. my case is still pending, but based on the initial call back from the case manager, it is not looking like there will be a resolution in our favor, we will see. my concern is, how many of these toyota dealers are not thoroughly inspecting these trucks, spraying over the problems and putting these vehicles back on the roads. how safe is that? | |||
| 03/14/2005 | 91080 | ||
| Due to premature corrosion (vehicle 4 years old) parking brake failed to function, failed nys inspection, was repaired (03/14/2005). due to premature corrosion, spring broke, was repaired (01/02/2008). power steering rack rotted, had to be replaced. approx mileage 150,000. front suspenion links rotted out. called toyota (04/15/2009) voiced our concern for rotting frame, no recall at that time. they issued a complaint #.took vehicle to dealer for inspection for three recalls, a0f, b0d, 90m on 05/02/2012. inspection not properly done, chunks of rust still can be flaked off, possible holes behind, but they sprayed crc over top of the loose scaling, covering over the problems. we had no choice in what they were doing with our property. we took it in for an inspection. after said inspection, if it would not get a new frame, we would have opted to take it home, removed all loose scaling prior to the crc being applied. we were not given any options, our vehicle was already on the way to their collision shop for the work. this would have accomplished two things; the dealership would know without a doubt that there were no holes and the crc would stick directly to the frame minimizing future corrosion (that is the objective of the recall afterall) i called toyota corporate and voiced my concern with a spray covering over the problem, and the truck not being safe. my case is still pending, but based on the initial call back from the case manager, it is not looking like there will be a resolution in our favor, we will see. my concern is, how many of these toyota dealers are not thoroughly inspecting these trucks, spraying over the problems and putting these vehicles back on the roads. how safe is that? | |||
| 03/14/2005 | 91080 | ||
| Due to premature corrosion (vehicle 4 years old) parking brake failed to function, failed nys inspection, was repaired (03/14/2005). due to premature corrosion, spring broke, was repaired (01/02/2008). power steering rack rotted, had to be replaced. approx mileage 150,000. front suspenion links rotted out. called toyota (04/15/2009) voiced our concern for rotting frame, no recall at that time. they issued a complaint #.took vehicle to dealer for inspection for three recalls, a0f, b0d, 90m on 05/02/2012. inspection not properly done, chunks of rust still can be flaked off, possible holes behind, but they sprayed crc over top of the loose scaling, covering over the problems. we had no choice in what they were doing with our property. we took it in for an inspection. after said inspection, if it would not get a new frame, we would have opted to take it home, removed all loose scaling prior to the crc being applied. we were not given any options, our vehicle was already on the way to their collision shop for the work. this would have accomplished two things; the dealership would know without a doubt that there were no holes and the crc would stick directly to the frame minimizing future corrosion (that is the objective of the recall afterall) i called toyota corporate and voiced my concern with a spray covering over the problem, and the truck not being safe. my case is still pending, but based on the initial call back from the case manager, it is not looking like there will be a resolution in our favor, we will see. my concern is, how many of these toyota dealers are not thoroughly inspecting these trucks, spraying over the problems and putting these vehicles back on the roads. how safe is that? | |||
| 03/14/2005 | 91080 | ||
| Due to premature corrosion (vehicle 4 years old) parking brake failed to function, failed nys inspection, was repaired (03/14/2005). due to premature corrosion, spring broke, was repaired (01/02/2008). power steering rack rotted, had to be replaced. approx mileage 150,000. front suspenion links rotted out. called toyota (04/15/2009) voiced our concern for rotting frame, no recall at that time. they issued a complaint #.took vehicle to dealer for inspection for three recalls, a0f, b0d, 90m on 05/02/2012. inspection not properly done, chunks of rust still can be flaked off, possible holes behind, but they sprayed crc over top of the loose scaling, covering over the problems. we had no choice in what they were doing with our property. we took it in for an inspection. after said inspection, if it would not get a new frame, we would have opted to take it home, removed all loose scaling prior to the crc being applied. we were not given any options, our vehicle was already on the way to their collision shop for the work. this would have accomplished two things; the dealership would know without a doubt that there were no holes and the crc would stick directly to the frame minimizing future corrosion (that is the objective of the recall afterall) i called toyota corporate and voiced my concern with a spray covering over the problem, and the truck not being safe. my case is still pending, but based on the initial call back from the case manager, it is not looking like there will be a resolution in our favor, we will see. my concern is, how many of these toyota dealers are not thoroughly inspecting these trucks, spraying over the problems and putting these vehicles back on the roads. how safe is that? | |||
| 06/17/2011 | 121840 | ||
| Brakes pulsate and go all the way to the floor; you must quickly release and re-apply to stop vehicle then you get a bad vibration and horrible noises before vehicle finally stops. my service mechanic cannot get toyota to fax him the diagrams he needs to diagnose and repair issue. i have read over 300 complaints online about this same issue from other 2001 toyota tundra owners. this is a safety issue and there have been near miss accidents because of this issue. | |||
| 01/01/2004 | 18000 | ||
| Tl-the contact own a 2001 toyota tundra. the contact stated that while driving approximately 45 mph, the steering wheel began to vibrate vigorously. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for diagnostic. the technician stated that the rotors would have to be replaced. the failure continued after the rotors were replaced. the mechanic then stated that the failure may be occurring because the vehicle | |||
| 01/01/2004 | 18000 | ||
| Tl- the contact own a 2001 toyota tundra. while driving at approximately 45 mph the steering wheel began to vibrate vigorously. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for diagnostic. the technician stated the rotors would have to be replaced. the failure continued after the rotors were replaced. the mechanic stated the failure may be cause because the vehicles weight may be excessive for the brake system. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 18,000. ds | |||
| 07/12/2011 | 120000 | ||
| 2001 toyota tundra complaint: while i was driving in the city all of a sudden i lost 90% of my braking ability. after pulling over to the side and inspecting my front brakes i notice my left driver's side had fluid on the road and tire. limping it home and on farther inspection the bracket that supports the flex line from the frame to bracket and the ridged line from the bracket to the brake caliper was rusted off, this caused the ridged line to fracture. after purchasing a new bracket i than needed to look at the passenger side to see exactly how to mount the new bracket, to my surprise the passenger side bracket was also rusted off. i am sure it would have been a short period of time before i loss my brakes again had i not inspected the passenger side. when notifying the dealer about it i was pretty much blown off as the only person with this problem there for i probably just imagined it. so i guess my complaint is recalling these trucks for an inspection of singular rust problem such as the spire tire bracket is a joke. these trucks are just simply road hazards and are going to get a lot of people killed if action is not taken to get these rust buckets off the road. | |||
| 05/31/2011 | 140000 | ||
| Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. the contact stated while driving 65 mph, he applied the brakes and the vehicle would not slow down until the contact engaged the brakes aggressively before the vehicle came to a complete stop. the manufacturer was contacted and told him to contact the dealer. the dealer was not contacted. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was unavailable the current mileage was 140,000. | |||
| 03/08/2011 | 40000 | ||
| Im on the third set of front brakes for my truck which just turned 60000 miles and it is a 2001 toyota tundra. this is totally unacceptable for a vehicle of this mileage. | |||
| 04/14/2001 | 4 | ||
| Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. the contact received a recall notice for recall 09v444000 (structure: frame and members:underbody shields). the contact also stated that the vehicle would vibrate rapidly when the brakes were applied and the check engine light would also illuminate. the contact called the dealer and the dealer offered no assistance. the vin was unavailable. the failure mileage was 4. the current mileage was approximately 84,000. | |||
| 02/13/2010 | 87000 | 1 | |
| 2001 tundra brakes failed to stop truck from hitting vehicle in front on a sudden stop on the interstate. found out later that toyota knew of defective brakes and issued tsb br004-002 to replace 191mm front brake calipers with larger 231 mm calipers within the warranty period, but did not notify owners of the defect. only owners who complained of vibration when braking and early failure of front rotors and brake pads were offered the upgraded calipers, but only after repeated complaints. the upgraded calipers were eventually incorporated into the 2004 and later tundras. *tr | |||
| 12/10/2004 | 45865 | 1 | |
| My 2001 tundra vibrated so bad when i went to slow down form highway speeds. the vibration is so bad the truck steering and dash shake i have replaced the rotors and drums i think the problem is the rear drums having to do with the bypass valve sending fluid back to the brake peddle or some thing because it only happens when the 2 drums lop so the auto bake adjust. *tr | |||
| 02/25/2010 | 150000 | 1 | |
| Toyota tundra brake issue. my truck brakes start to pulse at all speed while attempting to stop. i have inside the last two years replaces three sets of front brake pads and rotors. this is particularly frightening while apply the brakes exiting the freeway on wet roads the brakes don't seem to want to stop the truck in a straight line and the front end has a tendency to jump and drift to one side of the road. i have made several attempts my self having the brakes repaired by qualified mechanic and even to blame the brakes on one mechanic that he did not know what he was doing i have since found that he did know what he was doing he just did knot know about the toyota tundra brake issue history as i did not know as well till now. each time the mechanic blamed it on the driving habits. this is not the case, as the last time i had my brakes worked on was just last year in november and found that the brakes have done the same thing in less time then in the past. in addition the mechanic found that the pulsing of the front end had damaged the front end which cost over $3,000.00 to fix. its just now after the toyota gas peddle issue came to light that i started to do some research and found that this has been happening for over 8 years with the toyota tundras all over the country. this is a real issue with the tundra year 2001. *tr | |||
| 05/01/2009 | 59000 | 1 | |
| My 2001 toyota tundra sr5 4wd. access cab pick-up truck has a rusted out frame. my truck broke down on the highway(may 1st) i towed it to my mechanic shop. my mechanic replaced an oxygen sensor that had rusted away on the exhaust system. further inspected the vehicle and said it had extreme corrosion (rust) on the frame, brake line connections, suspension mounts, exhaust system....rust everywhere. he suggested it was unsafe to drive because the brake line connection points were so corroded (rusted away) that they could fail while in operation.*tr | |||
| 03/08/2009 | 1 | ||
| I have a 2001 toyota tundra. it presently has ~80k miles on it. since i've owned it which was ~40k miles, it has required several brake replacements and towards the end of life of each one the truck vibrates excessively when i brake. *tr | |||
| 02/21/2005 | 38000 | ||
| Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. when the contact applied pressure to the brake pedal, he felt sporadic pulsations. the vehicle was taken to the dealer twice and they replaced the brake rotor and related components in the braking system. several months after the repair, the failure recurred. the manufacturer was unable to assist. the failure mileage was 38,000 and current mileage was 80,000. | |||
| 10/10/2008 | 78132 | 1 | |
| Brakes on my 2001 toyota tundra began to pulsate violently when coming to a stop. toyota has a tsb on this brake problem (br004-02), but with 78,000 on vehicle, they will not fix it, although they know it is a design flaw. toyota needs a recall on these vehicles. i am the original owner. *tr | |||
| 05/02/2008 | 1 | ||
| Original owner of 2001 toyota tundra. needed new front brake pads at 45k miles, needed front rotors turned at 60k miles, performed by toyota. now 6k miles later, it needs rotors turned again due to repeat warpage. toyota has been aware of this design defect, technical service bulletins have been issued, yet no recalls have been issued. another bulletin was in place for the defective rear brake adjuster, which will not keep rear brakes adjusted over time, causing additional stress on the undersized front brake system. i contacted the national consumer hotline at toyota. they will not do anything for this problem. the brake system is unsafe. a recall should be issued before someone is injured. *tr | |||
| 10/29/2006 | 143000 | 1 | 02/24/2002 |
| Dt*: the contact stated while applying brake pressure at 35 mph, the brake pedal went all the way down to the floorboard. although brake pressure was applied, the brakes did not respond, and the vehicle drove off the roadway. the contact engaged the emergency parking brake which stopped the vehicle. upon initial inspection by the contact, it was determined there was brake fluid leaking from underneath the rear of the vehicle. the vehicle was towed to the contact's residence. the dealer was alerted. | |||
| 10/23/2006 | 4 | 10/12/2001 | |
| Brake rotors doesn't seem to be large enough for the vehicle, resulting in excessive wear and trouble stopping vehicle especially going down grades. i have to have brakes replaced at least once a year. *nm | |||
| 08/23/2006 | 99000 | 4 | 07/03/2005 |
| Dt*: the contact stated the brake pads and rotors were too small for the vehicle. the rotors were machined three times. the problem reoccurred after only two months. when the brake were applied, the whole front end wobbled and shook. the dealership was made aware of the problem. | |||
| 08/04/2006 | 65000 | 1 | 07/10/2004 |
| I bought a 2001 toyota tundra in july of 2004. the truck had 64,000 miles. i have replace my brakes and had my rotors turned many time. the truck continually warps the rotors and has severe shaking when i brake. toyota sent out a tsb only to cover the warranty vehicles. they know they have a problem but refuse to fix them. i have done my research and there are thousands of people out there with the same problem. the only fix is to install oversized rotors and calipers and new brake lines at the cost of $2,000.00 plus. toyota knows there is a problem and will do nothing about it. please help! *nm | |||
| 07/01/2002 | 39000 | 1000 | 10/01/2001 |
| Dt*: the contact stated that on several occasions while driving 50 mph on normal conditions and than applying the brakes, the vehicle shimmies and bounces in an up and down motion until the brakes are released. the vehicle was taken to the dealer when problems first occurred where the brake pads and rotors were replaced however problem has gradually worsened over time. the manufacturer determined there was a recall pertaining to the characteristics on the vehicle however the vin was not included in the recall. | |||
| 06/10/2006 | 15000 | 4 | 09/06/2001 |
| I have a 2001 toyota tundra and have been experiencing brake vibration prolbems for years. toyota has recently been grievously irresponsible about issuing warnings and recall notices on its toyota tundra trucks. there is little question that a design flaw in the tundra causes front rotors to warp very quickly, causing the truck to shudder during braking. toyota even issued a technical service bulletin, but toyota dealers have not alerted consumers to the problem. i have been told many times there is not a problem or blamed for braking too hard, that is, until their 36,000 mile warranty expired. at this point the toyota dealership acknowledged the brake problem and offered assistance at full price....about $2000. the toyota tundras are breaking down because the rear brakes do not self-adjust properly. this transfers the entire braking load to the front wheels. the front rotors are not designed to withstand that much pressure and heat, and so they end up warping. this is what causes the severe shimmy and vibration at all speeds, but especially between 40-50 mph. because this is a fundamental problem with the rear brakes, rotors that are repaired are completely warped again within 5,000 miles. toyota has had dozens of other problems with the tundra model, but they only issue technical service bulletins online and make no attempt to inform customers. everyone acknowledges the problem, but since my truck has over 36,000 miles we have to basically pay for a manufacture defect. this problem is not due to normal use and wear, it ia a design problem, and one that toyota needs to fix. toyota needs to stand behind their product. *nm | |||
| 06/05/2004 | 42000 | 3 | 06/05/2004 |
| I am 2nd owner of truck for 2 yr. 1st owner had brake shutter on stopping, and took to dealer. they wanted to replace frt pads/surface rotors. they wanted $300.00 more than anyone to fix. had brakes replaced at local garage. i bought truck, and had shutter in brakes, called dealer, and they said that after 36k miles they would fix the brakes for $2000-$2500.00, and now there is a tsb for the rear brakes, and that will cost another $1500.00. they said that this is not a toyota problem, and the customer should bear the cost to fix truck. truck has 58k miles, and not used for hauling loads. the mfg. should replace problem parts, and no charge repairs. *nm | |||
| 08/18/2005 | 91980 | 2 | 02/15/2005 |
| I bought my 2001 toyota tundra in febuary of 2005. when ide bought the brakes where in good shape. after just 3 months of driving my truck started shaking violently when applying the brakes at higher speeds (30-55mph). i took it to a mechanic and he said that the brakes were shot and that the rotors were in need of turning. i proceeded with the repairs and was back on the road again till two nights ago. my family and i were coming home after sunset when a cow darted out in the middle of the road. i acted quickly and veired only to find that the brakes didnt work causing me to loose control of my truck. i was able to regain control by knowing the proper procedures from a defensive driving course ide taken when my occupation was as a firefighter but i still came in contact with the animal in the road due to the brake failure. ive since taken the truck back to my mechanic and the brakes and rotors are shot once again. he said the exceedingly rapid ware of the brakes and rotors came from a malfunction on the rear brakes which in turn causes over strain on the front brakes resulting in premature break failure. ive searched the internet and if your staff can possibly do the same they'll find that this has been a terribly common problem in the toyota tundras year model 2000 through 2004. ive recently started circulating a petition for others that have had these problems with their toyota to accumulate proof that the problem has exsisted for some time now and that it has happened in an extremly large number of the toyota tundras. their are countless testimonies of people with the same problems and have tried going to the manufacturer only to get the run around or just simply ignored. toyota is in violation of manufacturing defective vehicles and selling them to the public with no concern what so ever for the safety and concern of there customers or the people that they share the roadways with. | |||
| 48000 | 1 | ||
| The vehicle experienced heavy vibration while driving downhill. please provide any further information. *nlm | |||
| 05/15/2003 | 05/05/2001 | ||
| After having my brakes replaced at the dealership under the technical service bulletins issued by toyota, i had to return due to severe shuddering in the front end. the tsb required my brakes to be replaced in full (front and rear). the resolution on the 15 may 2003 was to turn the drums and reduce my tire pressure below the tire manufacturers recommended pressure rating. *jb | |||
| 05/05/2003 | 28000 | 1 | 05/20/2001 |
| Braking system in 2001 tundra: rotors and drums are badly warped causing severe vibration when braking at higher speeds (above 30 mph).*jb | |||
| 04/01/2002 | 12500 | 1 | |
| Brake pedal fades under pressure and acts inconsistently. at times the brakes engage near the top of the pedal and at other times almost at the floor. brake light has come on several times. parking brake will engage after three or four clicks and the next time will not engage almost to floor. dealer has replaced pads, drums, disks, etc. dealer and toyota motor sales will not return calls, letters, etc.*jb | |||
| 03/22/2002 | 17864 | 4 | |
| While applying the brakes the vehicle will vibrate especally on the passenger side. ts the brake pads were replaced then adjusted and the rotors were replaced. however vibration, shutter and high pitched noise still exist. on one occasion consumer heard a clunking noise and found the caliper pin sticking out of trim of hubcap. with caliper pin in hand, consumer was angry when dealership had no knowledge of service bulletin for brake problems. balancing weights fell off. heater stopped working due to packing material. foam material was removed. *tt | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | |||
| 04/10/2007 | 2 | 03/10/2007 | |
| I purchased a 2001 toyota tundra in march of 2007. i have had problems with the front brakes warping the rotors. i have since found that there was a service bulletin on the brake problems in 2002 on this model. the bulletin required a larger brake caliper and pads because the system was to small to handle the truck weight. the factory installed system was heating up and causing the problem. my contention is this should be a safety issue since factory installed brakes are not large enough to handle the truck. i have taken the truck to mechanics on three occasions. rotors have been turned, but the problem continues. mechanics from these locations and from a toyota dealership advise me the problem will continue until the bulletin called for calipers are installed. with the problem as it is, the truck is hard to stop when breaking from 50 mph and up. *tr | |||
| 10/10/2001 | 30000 | 1 | 10/10/2001 |
| Dt: 2001 toyota tundra. the consumer states he has wheel hop when braking and the vehicle shimmies. there is a tsb, but the consumer is responsible for the payment. this started at 30,000 miles. the brakes were replaced at 42,000 miles. the problem came back after the brakes were replaced. this problem has been going on since the purchase of the vehicle.*ak | |||
| 11/10/2003 | 40000 | 1 | |
| When applying the brakes there was a vibration that caused the whole truck to vibrate. the dealership knew about this problem and did nothing because the vehicle's warranty expired. *la *ph *nm | |||
| Upon applying brakes drive must completely press pedal to the floor before vehicle will completely stop. please provide any further information.*ak | |||
| 02/01/2001 | |||
| When abs kicks in it intermittently makes a loud banging noise, almost like vehicle is back firing. when vehicle makes sudden stops pedal shakes and abs kicks in. toyota inspector says noise is normal.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - CONTROL UNIT/MODULE | |||
| 11/05/2007 | 82300 | 1 | 03/06/2001 |
| Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. while the vehicle was parked in the garage, the abs electronic control module melted onto the floor. the garage was filled with grey smoke, ash, and soot. the mechanic stated that an electrical short occurred and the abs electronic control module's power unit remains operational when the engine is shut off. the vehicle was towed to a mechanic. the abs control module will be replaced and the wiring harness may also need to be replaced. the washer fluid bottle tubes were damaged. the current and failure mileages were 82,300. | |||
| 12/16/2005 | 36900 | 1 | 11/28/2000 |
| Antilock unit caught fire while the vehicle was parked at work. there was no previous indication of a problem. severe damage to vehicle. have pictures. *nm | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FLUID | |||
| While vehicle was being driven extreme vibration occurred in front end.brake rotors prematurely wore out. rotors have been resurfaced, and brakes have totally failed at times.problems has not been corrected. dealer has determined that cause was brake fluid contamination. please give any further details.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS | |||
| 06/30/2005 | 3 | 06/27/2001 | |
| Excessive vibration in brakes. my 2001 toyota tundra has excessive vibration in my brakes. i have had the front rotors changed twice, and the rear drums changed twice, i have changed the pads and shoes twice also. it wont go away. toyota posted a recall for it but will only repair it if the vehicle is under warranty. the average cost for this repair is around $1700. i think that toyota should step up to the plate and take care of this. | |||
| 09/11/2001 | 3 | ||
| While driving and when brakes were applied they didn't hold. contacted dealer. replaced part 3 times; however problem reoccurred. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC | |||
| 06/01/2002 | 25000 | 5 | 10/30/2001 |
| Toyota tundra 2001 brake damage caused by defective design. brakes fail prematurely due to inadequate brake design. only a few hard brake incidents cause front disc rotor warpage. toyota will not replace and instead blames customer. even if customer follows toyota recommended driving practices (brake as little as possible) failure still occurs due to impossibility of following these directions. please force toyota to replace all tundra 2001 brake systems with redesigned system to prevent failure. *jb | |||
| 01/25/2005 | 50000 | 100 | 07/28/2001 |
| There was a severe vibration in my front brakes when driving with my pickup bed loaded with wood and coming down a hill. also, happened to a lesser extent when pickup bed was empty and coming off the freeway on a downslope. had my brakes serviced, and was advised of tsb br004-02. front brake calipers, backing plates, brake hoses, wheel bearings, oil seals and flange bolts were replaced. because the vehicle is out of warranty i had to pay over $2,000 plus tax. i feel this is wrong due to tsb should be a recall. there is obvious design fault in the sizing of the calipers.*ak | |||
| 04/04/2003 | 15000 | 1 | 06/12/2001 |
| On my 2001 tundra, when appling the brakes there is sever vibration causing the whole truck to vibrate. the dealership replaced the front and rear brakes but the vibration still occurs. it has caused the tires to wear excessivly and there is only 20,000 miles on the truck. *ak | |||
| 12/01/2001 | 3 | 12/01/2000 | |
| Brake rotors continue to become warped from excessive heat in normal braking conditions. dealers have instructed about tsb, but have ruled that my vehicle is exempt due to mileage being outside of the original manufacturer's warranty period. problem manifested itself prior to expiration of warranty period and was never resolved. dt | |||
| 07/01/2001 | 3 | 12/01/2000 | |
| Not enough space, please contact me at (623)217-6864. no safety defect listed. *ak | |||
| 11/14/2001 | 1 | 08/01/2001 | |
| Approx. 3 months after purcasing my truck the brakes would grab intermitently upon application and also vibrate, dealership did the repair under warranty. the dealership replaced rotors and pads to dealer spec's. at 28,100. miles i will be calling the dealer again for the same problem. when will toyota corp. admitt there is a problem with the braking system ? the brakes on my truck have never felt right.*ak | |||
| 08/01/2001 | |||
| Under heavy braking down hill at 60 mph the vehicle vibrated rapidly. i do not have anti-lock brakes, but there was heavy vibration with the brakes. | |||
| 10/14/2001 | 5 | 05/01/2001 | |
| Rotors and drums warp very easily and need to be replaced. toyota knows it is a problem and is still selling the vehicle.*ak | |||
| 07/20/2001 | 4 | 04/01/2001 | |
| This brake vibration problem has occurred 4 times with each new brake overhaul. the dealer repair has been attempted 4 times (10219, 11693, 13663, 17824 miles) but still no resolution. i currently have 19100 miles and need repair for the 5th time to avoid possible incident on the roadways. i consider this to be a serious safety issue.*ak | |||
| 07/07/2001 | 3 | 12/01/2000 | |
| The truck vibrates while applying the brakes. i have brought it to the dealer three times and the problem returns. it does not feel safe when it shudders violently while braking and turning. nhtsa needs to work with toyota to find a better solution.*jb | |||
| 06/27/2001 | 5 | 09/01/2000 | |
| I own a 2001 toyota tundra sr5 extra cab 4x4. at 15392 miles i began feeling a shutter/vibration from my brakes when braking at speeds above 40 miles an hour. i took it to the dealer who said he had one other vehicle with the same problem. they stated that the truck warped the rear drums and front rotors. after repairing the problem, i have gone between 500-4000 miles between the problem occurring again. in each instance, the dealership has replaced the defective part under warranty but can't fix the problem. i was told by the dealership that there is no safety problem and that the only thing i feel is the warped drums and rotors. i am worried about the safety of utilizing this truck as i would think that over time as the calipers keep getting pushed back that this will deteriorate then braking mechanism. i am currently scheduled for a new vehicle arbitration board on tuesday march 12, 2002. according to the representative from toyota, this problem is due to my exessive/heavy use and is normal wear and tear on the equipment. this truck is used mostly to commute to work and during the winter i tow a snowmobile trailer that only weighs 2000 lbs loaded. i don't know of any brake parts that are supposed to wear out, or even warp in that short of time no matter what the vehicle is used for. toyota has tsb's about this problem but they don't seem to correct it. please help with any information possible. *ak | |||
| 02/24/2002 | 4 | 10/01/2000 | |
| The truck has been back to the dealer for shimmy on high speed braking, and has had 3 sets of brakes, and is now doing it again.*ak | |||
| 08/08/2001 | |||
| While driving 35 to 45 mph and applying brakes vehicle will vibrate. took vehicle to dealer, and dealer replaced disc and disc pads, but problem still exists.*ak | |||
| 03/16/2001 | 4 | 10/01/2000 | |
| At 8,900 miles excessive wear of front disc pads and rear drums due to defective rotors being out of round. dealer notified, and replaced rotors/ rear drums, and front disc pads. but, problem still occurring. *ak customer states heater not working, dealer found heater cable loose. *tt | |||
| 06/09/2001 | 2 | 09/01/2000 | |
| No summary listed for above vehicle. *ak | |||
| 09/01/2001 | 3 | 09/25/2000 | |
| Front disc brakes have to be changed every five thousand miles since date of purchase. dealer has been contacted. *ak | |||
| 07/01/2001 | 1 | 12/01/2000 | |
| Both front rotors warped. service tech. stated the rear brakes were not adjusting properly, causing the front rotors to overheat.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - CALIPER | |||
| 03/02/2006 | 64215 | 1 | 03/30/2001 |
| Bolt holding driver side brake caliper (front) was found missing. this bolt is one of four that hold the two caliper sides (inner and outer) together. called local toyota dealership and was told i had to buy the complete caliper assembly for $387 to get the bolt. i called the toyota national help line and they confirmed verbally that the last time they came across this problem the problem was solved by the purchase of a complete assembled caliper. the bolt is a 10mm x 1.25 x 90mm with a hardness stamp of 9.*jb | |||
| 03/31/2006 | 56000 | 1 | |
| 2001 toyota tundra front brake shimmy so severe that truck was unsafe to drive. began at approximately 40k miles and progressively got worse until entire front brake rebuild required costing over $2,200 at 56k miles. *jb | |||
| 02/11/2005 | 40000 | 2 | 06/06/2001 |
| Brakes and ball joint failure of toyota tundra lim. 4door 4.7l 8 cylinder 4x4 right side wheel came off and hit two persons on the shoulder of the highway in which one was killed.*ak | |||
| 09/07/2005 | 37629 | 2 | 06/20/2001 |
| My 2001 tundra truck has only 80,000 miles and for the second time the calipers and braking system are having to be redone. this starts with severe vibrations in the steering wheel when applying the brakes. if on an incline, the vibration can be so bad it is difficult to hold the steering and stop. you have to release the brake to relieve the vibration and then re-apply quickly. the local toyota dealership is fixing this problem for the second time and i do not have the old parts. the first time this happened was around 37629 miles in may of 2003, now it has happened again at 80800 miles in september 2005. *nm | |||
| 03/05/2005 | 100 | 3 | 07/01/2001 |
| I have brake problems. i have less than 36000 and my brake pad needed to be replaced. i have also had a abnormal vibration in the truck when applying the brakes. this has been the case since i purchased the vechilce new. thought it was normal for the truck but guess not. toyota is paying for the parts ,and i'm paying for labor to replace rotors, pads, calipers to resolve the issue. costing me $400. *ak | |||
| 02/03/2005 | 60000 | 1 | 04/20/2001 |
| I recently bought a ?certified used? 2001 toyota tundra and purchased the extended warranty. within a few months, the truck brakes started acting funky. i took it to the dealership for routine oil change, mentioned the problem, and they said they would adjust the brakes. this helped it brakes for a few more months. the brakes started to get worse and would vibrate the entire truck when braking. i did an internet search and learned of a tsb for toyota tundra braking problem where toyota recognized that the brake calipers were undersized for the truck. i took the truck to the dealer and the warranty covered replacement of the brake calipers and other components, but would not cover the rotors that were damaged by their factory defective braking calipers. i feel that toyota should recall all toyota models with the known braking problem, and reimburse all owners that have had costly repairs. thanks, jay. *jb | |||
| 01/25/2005 | 50000 | 100 | 07/28/2001 |
| There was a severe vibration in my front brakes when driving with my pickup bed loaded with wood and coming down a hill. also, happened to a lesser extent when pickup bed was empty and coming off the freeway on a downslope. had my brakes serviced, and was advised of tsb br004-02. front brake calipers, backing plates, brake hoses, wheel bearings, oil seals and flange bolts were replaced. because the vehicle is out of warranty i had to pay over $2,000 plus tax. i feel this is wrong due to tsb should be a recall. there is obvious design fault in the sizing of the calipers.*ak | |||
| 04/05/2004 | 0 | ||
| Front brakes/brakes are poorly designed/insufficient to handle the task of stopping the truck. front brake rotor is warped from overheating. the truck vibrates badly when the brakes are applied, and pulls dangerously to the left. toyota knows all this - it is in their tsb instructing dealers to replace/upgrade tundra front brakes if still under warranty. | |||
| 06/24/2003 | 44900 | 1 | 04/21/2001 |
| I have a 2001 toyota tundra. i feel that the braking system is not what it should be. i have had the rotors turned and new brake shoes put on, but i am still experiencing a bad shake in the brakes. *jb | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - PADS | |||
| 03/05/2005 | 100 | 3 | 07/01/2001 |
| I have brake problems. i have less than 36000 and my brake pad needed to be replaced. i have also had a abnormal vibration in the truck when applying the brakes. this has been the case since i purchased the vechilce new. thought it was normal for the truck but guess not. toyota is paying for the parts ,and i'm paying for labor to replace rotors, pads, calipers to resolve the issue. costing me $400. *ak | |||
| 03/20/2005 | 45 | 100 | 06/15/2001 |
| There is vibration in the steering system, when applying brakes most noticable when braking from speeds over 45 mph or on down hills. i have had the brake pads replaced, rotors turned, and the problem returned in a few weeks. i asked toyota dealership to repair, they refused, the vehicle is out of warranty. i'm the original owner. *ak | |||
| 11/05/2003 | 55000 | 10/15/2001 | |
| 2001 toyota tundra brakes shake excessively even after replacing them with new ones. transmission makes a loud thump when going into overdrive. *la | |||
| 10/08/2003 | 37000 | 2 | 05/18/2001 |
| The brakes on the 2000 to 2003 toyota tundra overheatthe rotors warp, and pads wear 3 times faster there is finally a tsb on the brakes they now have a new improved caliper.this should be a recall they try to get you through the warrenty period and turn there backs on you.there are many people with the same problem at 39,000 miles i need$ 1,500 of work and toyota says to bad the vibration is so bad i dont want to drive it it is not safe for the road these calipers are a bad design.there is a new part # for the new type.also the rear brakes 2000-2001 the stare adjuster is a bad design and a tsb is out to fix please help. *ak | |||
| 12/01/2001 | 1 | ||
| I have a 2001 toyota tundra and have had constant problems with my brakes. there is strong vibration when using the brakes. i have had it fixed twice by toyota and once by and independent mechanic and the problem comes back every time.there is a tsb on the truck but no recall. toyota customers were not even informed of the tsb.*ak | |||
| 01/26/2002 | 8000 | 5 | 11/09/2001 |
| 2001 toyota tundra brake problem. severe shaking of vehicle do to brakes. rotors feel warped. gone through 4 sets of pads and resurfaced rotors 3 timesi n the last 2 years. tech serve bulliten available but only for 36000/3yr im at 50000/but only 1 1/2... $2000 for the repairs and on top of that i spent quite a bit ofmoney already for the rotor resurfacing and brake pads. i was a toyota fan until this.... *ak | |||
| 04/01/2001 | 09/01/2000 | ||
| Vehicle still shutters& vibrates when applying brakes after 2 times into dealer for warranty repair work. the dealer says that there is no problem. they replaced all brake pads and drums the first time and turned the rear drums the second time.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - ROTOR | |||
| 02/07/2006 | 65000 | 2 | 02/22/2003 |
| Toyota tundra limited 2001. replaced rotors on (2) different occasions, due to vibration when stopping. warped rotors were to blame. toyota refuses to replace or repair defective items. *tr | |||
| 06/14/2006 | 60000 | 1 | 10/16/2001 |
| Brakes on my 2001 toyota tundra are not working properly. going down a hill, it is hard to control the truck because of he vibration coming from the front end. i have discovered recently their have been many complaints about brakes on 2000-2001 tundras. *tr | |||
| 01/12/2008 | 79000 | 2 | |
| Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. the contact had to replace the brakes in august of 2007. in november, the vehicle was taken back to the dealer because an adjustment was needed. recently, the contact's husband heard grinding noises coming from the tire area while driving 60 mph. the vehicle was towed to the dealer and they stated that the bearing completely failed. the technician stated that whoever worked on the brakes set the rotors too low, causing the bearing to malfunction. the purchase date and powertrain were unknown. the current mileage was 80,350 and failure mileage was 79,000. | |||
| 07/02/2007 | 1 | 08/15/2000 | |
| When braking a 2001 toyota tundra entire vehicle vibrates to the point of diminished control. *tr | |||
| 06/05/2007 | 3 | ||
| Brake rotors have prematurely warped. three sets of brakes in less the 75,000 miles. truck has never towed anything, is driven by 45 year-old. violent vibration occured every time pedal was dpressed. *ak | |||
| 06/16/2004 | 20000 | 10 | 08/13/2001 |
| Brakes vibrating; warped rotors. *tr | |||
| 06/30/2006 | 30000 | 1 | 07/22/2004 |
| I own a 2001 toyota tundra. after 30,000 miles my brakes began to shudder when trying to slow down from high speeds (greater than 40 mph). it is obvious that the rotors are severely warped. this is a severe safety issue. *jb | |||
| 05/10/2006 | 1 | 02/11/2001 | |
| 2001 toyota tundra access cab sr5 purchased new. there has been no complete failure yet, but quite often the front brakes shudder so bad when i apply them hard it feels almost like a speed wobble on a motorcycle. it has gotten so violent at times that i have had to grab the wheel with both hands as tight as i can. the lions share of my driving is on the freeway and as i am aware of the problem i do my best to maintain a safe distance from others. knowing that toyota does their best to push the issue aside (i have read the tsb and all the complaints) i have never even contacted them about this issue. i have put 4 sets of pads on in just over 120 miles so i don't think they wear out any faster than any other brands but from what i have read, there are no replacement discs or pads available that are any better. i know the rotors are warped but not worn out. i have learned to live with the problem but this issue is serious enough that i won't be buying another one. there are 5 other full size truck mfgs. out there. *jb | |||
| 05/03/2006 | 8000 | 6 | 05/01/2001 |
| 2001 toyota tundra 72,000 miles. in today for the 6th brake job. rotors warped and disks drums fail. real brakes out of adjustment. truck won't break correctly and shudders violently. toyota knows about the problem and tried to fix it but now has another fix that will cost me 2,000 dollars. this is a major safety issue, thousands if not 100 of thousands of tundra owners have this design defect and toyota refuses to issue recall. the internet has lots of examples of this documented problem. if gm would issue a recall for a tail light , what should be the response to trucks that won't stop and shudder violently? *nm | |||
| 03/31/2006 | 56000 | 1 | |
| 2001 toyota tundra front brake shimmy so severe that truck was unsafe to drive. began at approximately 40k miles and progressively got worse until entire front brake rebuild required costing over $2,200 at 56k miles. *jb | |||
| 06/23/2005 | 09/30/2000 | ||
| 2001 toyota tundra. braking shakes truck violently. through experience (auto racing) i believe the problem to be warped front rotors. the design of these rotors are obviously defective. | |||
| 02/15/2005 | 76128 | 1 | 07/17/2001 |
| Purchased truck new in 2001. excessive front brake pad wear out since new 6,000 to 10,000 miles per set. noticed a looseness in front end early on and progressively worse as time went on including wobbling and lurching while braking. at 36,000 + miles toyota replaced complete front and rear brake system with a heaver duty system at no cost. front end still felt loose. at 52,000 miles dealer repalced front rotors and second set of pads since system up date at my expense. still the front end felt loose. at 76,000 miles f/l wheel assemble breaks off the truck while driving over a small speed bump at less then 10 mph damaging fender and door. a toyota dealer fixed the truck. the front end still feels loose and the dealer will not check or work on the truck because i filed a complaint with the bureau of auto repair. my complaint was the dealer did not return to me the repalced parts which i requested several times. the dealer told me he did not have to give mt the damaged parts and that nothing would happen to him because he was friends with the local consumer rep. i was contacted by a consumer rep and he told me the same thing and there was nothing he could do but put a note in the dealers file. i have not gotten any official report since filing my complaint. my truck is unsafe and i have no choice but to continue to drive it. | |||
| 03/05/2005 | 100 | 3 | 07/01/2001 |
| I have brake problems. i have less than 36000 and my brake pad needed to be replaced. i have also had a abnormal vibration in the truck when applying the brakes. this has been the case since i purchased the vechilce new. thought it was normal for the truck but guess not. toyota is paying for the parts ,and i'm paying for labor to replace rotors, pads, calipers to resolve the issue. costing me $400. *ak | |||
| 03/20/2005 | 45 | 100 | 06/15/2001 |
| There is vibration in the steering system, when applying brakes most noticable when braking from speeds over 45 mph or on down hills. i have had the brake pads replaced, rotors turned, and the problem returned in a few weeks. i asked toyota dealership to repair, they refused, the vehicle is out of warranty. i'm the original owner. *ak | |||
| 01/11/2005 | 64000 | 2 | |
| Dealership informed consumer that premature warping of front brake rotors was repaired. *ak | |||
| 06/15/2004 | 30000 | 2 | |
| Front brake vibration that has made truck unsafe to drive. *jb | |||
| 01/04/2005 | 61000 | 3 | 09/06/2001 |
| Severe vibration in the vehicle almost resulted in loss of control. this occurred on 3 different occasions each time resulting in brake problems. under warranty i had the front brake rotors turned and dealer refused to do anything else at the time. since then the front rotors had to be replaced and then i developed rear brake vibrations. *ak | |||
| 12/10/2003 | 38000 | 4 | |
| My 2001 toyota tundra is having major problems with the breaking system. there is a violent shaking when you apply the breaks from higher speed. i have had the rotors turned 4 times and nothing seems to fix the problems. toyota denies any safety problems with the breaks. the back brakes won't tightened up causing more pressure on the front brakes. toyota is fixing some of the brakes on trucks that are under warranty, but only when you complain enough. the trucks that are out of warranty are told it will take over $2000.00 to fix it. they keep saying that the problem is not a safety issue so they want issue a recall. my truck is not used for any thing but back and forth to work, so it is not under any excessive strain. *jb | |||
| 09/25/2004 | 2 | ||
| While applying the brake pedal consumer heard a loud squeaking noise coming from the front. vehicle was taken to the dealer for inspection, and mechanic determined that the brakes needed to be replaced, and replaced them. ten minutes later while driving the driver applied the brake pedal and the brakes failed. vehicle was towed back to the dealer for inspection. the cause of the failure had not been determined. *ak | |||
| 11/03/2004 | 35000 | 1 | |
| I have experienced brake shudder since the mid 30000 miles. the brakes have been replaced twice (rotors turned twice). the problem still exist. i understand that toyota has a design problem with there brakes and there tsb's to make major corrections (approximately $2000 cost). on at least two occassions i have had to make an emergency stop and almost lost control due to the severity of the brake shudder.*ak | |||
| 04/05/2004 | 0 | ||
| Front brakes/brakes are poorly designed/insufficient to handle the task of stopping the truck. front brake rotor is warped from overheating. the truck vibrates badly when the brakes are applied, and pulls dangerously to the left. toyota knows all this - it is in their tsb instructing dealers to replace/upgrade tundra front brakes if still under warranty. | |||
| 02/23/2004 | 1 | 03/03/2001 | |
| Bad brakes,lost control of truck in wet weather,i was slowing down from 70 to 40 on a off ramp when my brakes began to shutter then the front brakes locked up,i was able to regain control after nearly hitting a car,i went to the shoulder and pumped the brakes and manged to slow down. ive had this truck in the shop 3 times for brake repair to no avail.i've gotten to the point that i don't drive this truck in wet weather.even in dry conditions the truck shakes and shimmeys. when applying the brakes.*ak | |||
| 11/05/2003 | 55000 | 10/15/2001 | |
| 2001 toyota tundra brakes shake excessively even after replacing them with new ones. transmission makes a loud thump when going into overdrive. *la | |||
| 10/08/2003 | 37000 | 2 | 05/18/2001 |
| The brakes on the 2000 to 2003 toyota tundra overheatthe rotors warp, and pads wear 3 times faster there is finally a tsb on the brakes they now have a new improved caliper.this should be a recall they try to get you through the warrenty period and turn there backs on you.there are many people with the same problem at 39,000 miles i need$ 1,500 of work and toyota says to bad the vibration is so bad i dont want to drive it it is not safe for the road these calipers are a bad design.there is a new part # for the new type.also the rear brakes 2000-2001 the stare adjuster is a bad design and a tsb is out to fix please help. *ak | |||
| 12/01/2001 | 1 | ||
| I have a 2001 toyota tundra and have had constant problems with my brakes. there is strong vibration when using the brakes. i have had it fixed twice by toyota and once by and independent mechanic and the problem comes back every time.there is a tsb on the truck but no recall. toyota customers were not even informed of the tsb.*ak | |||
| 11/15/2002 | 1 | ||
| Vehicle would shutter severely when braking at 50 or more mph. vehicle was taken to the dealer on several occasions and had the front rotors turned on two separate occasions. the problem kept recurring. feel free to provide any further information concerning this issue. *ph | |||
| 01/26/2002 | 8000 | 5 | 11/09/2001 |
| 2001 toyota tundra brake problem. severe shaking of vehicle do to brakes. rotors feel warped. gone through 4 sets of pads and resurfaced rotors 3 timesi n the last 2 years. tech serve bulliten available but only for 36000/3yr im at 50000/but only 1 1/2... $2000 for the repairs and on top of that i spent quite a bit ofmoney already for the rotor resurfacing and brake pads. i was a toyota fan until this.... *ak | |||
| 06/24/2003 | 44900 | 1 | 04/21/2001 |
| I have a 2001 toyota tundra. i feel that the braking system is not what it should be. i have had the rotors turned and new brake shoes put on, but i am still experiencing a bad shake in the brakes. *jb | |||
| 05/01/2001 | |||
| Repeated brake problems with heavy vibration when stopping. front rotors are inadequate for this vehicle. *ak | |||
| While vehicle was being driven extreme vibration occurred in front end.brake rotors prematurely wore out. rotors have been resurfaced, and brakes have totally failed at times.problems has not been corrected. dealer has determined that cause was brake fluid contamination. please give any further details.*ak | |||
| 01/15/2002 | 2 | 06/01/2001 | |
| Severe front disc vibration when brakes applied at around 45 mph.this was diagnosed by dealer as premature front rotor warping and repaired twice under warranty. problem continues.toyota of america has not issued a national recall campaign to once and for all permanently fix this issue through new product design/engineering.i recently discovered through an internet site called tundra solutions.com that there are many more frustrated tundra owners with this unresolved matter.please help us.*ak | |||
| 01/01/2002 | |||
| While driving at 65 mph vehicle started to shake, and when consumer tried to apply brakes, vehicle started to shake even more. contacted dealer, and dealer noted that there was 9 faulty codes that have gone off.*ak | |||
| 06/21/2001 | 1 | 02/01/2001 | |
| From contact with other owners of this vehicle there seems to be a failure pattern with the brakes on this vehicle. the brake drums and rotors appear to be warping and requiring replacement after approximately 4000 miles of use. toyota has issued tsb's to correct the problem but it does not appear to work from what other owners say. my son has the same vehicle and is on his third set of rotors with less than 15,000 miles on the truck. when i got my truck back with the new parts and applied the brakes on a long hill at 50 mph the vehicle went into a violent shaking motion and i thought control would be lost. it has not repeated this behavior but i question the safety of this vehicle.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DRUM | |||
| 01/17/2001 | 36700 | 0 | 08/10/2001 |
| Steering wheel shakes while braking between 50 mph to 40 mph. dealer stated that rear drums needs to be replaced and it's a known design flaw. even though it was a known flaw the company never notified me or others that i know that have 2001 tundras. ts | |||
| 3 | 04/01/2001 | ||
| No summary listed for above vehicle. *ak | |||
| 08/28/2001 | 07/01/2001 | ||
| This is our 3rd totoya tundra in the family. we had a green 2000 v8 sr5 with the same problem . we recently just bought also a close out model 2000 sr5 limited 4wd and it has the same problem, and then again i just bought a brand new sr5 v8 and it is doing the same thing. when you step on the brake it like the whole steering wheel vibrates, especially if you are braking from a high speed to a slower speed(ex. 70mph. to 50mph.) its like the whole car shakes. hopefully the nhtsa will look in to this matter so that this brake problem will be solved.*ak | |||
| 04/01/2001 | 09/01/2000 | ||
| Vehicle still shutters& vibrates when applying brakes after 2 times into dealer for warranty repair work. the dealer says that there is no problem. they replaced all brake pads and drums the first time and turned the rear drums the second time.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DRUM - DRUM | |||
| 01/04/2005 | 61000 | 3 | 09/06/2001 |
| Severe vibration in the vehicle almost resulted in loss of control. this occurred on 3 different occasions each time resulting in brake problems. under warranty i had the front brake rotors turned and dealer refused to do anything else at the time. since then the front rotors had to be replaced and then i developed rear brake vibrations. *ak | |||
| 10/01/2002 | 16000 | 06/01/2001 | |
| I have a vibration in the rear of my truck when braking from highway speed...usually around 45 mph it feels like the right rear tire is bouncing. i had the rear drums replaced per the most recent tsb, i had the front end aligned and tires balanced. the bounce is still there. the local toyota dealer tried to convince me that there is no problem. he wants me to believe what i feel is normal abs sensations. this doesn't hold water because the vibration is there when applying the parking brake and allowing it to slow the truck from highway speed. i called toyota and filed a complaint on march 3. after two months of not hearing anything (nothing...not a word), i called toyota back and was told that the dealer responded to them. the dealer said there was no problem that what i was feeling is abs. i explained to toyota that this couldn't be the case....the bounce exists when braking from highway speed using the parking brake. they sent another inquiry to the dealer because the dealer indicated they would call me and have me ride with the district manager. eleven days later and i still haven't heard anything. i called toyota again today. i was told that the dealer indicates that their master mechanic has driven the truck and can't find anything wrong with my truck. my truck hasn't been to the dealer since february when the service manager first told me the problem was anti-lock brakes. the customer service rep with toyota offered to escalate the complaint further up the ladder to toyota regional...whatever this means. he said someone should contact me within the next 3-4 days. the rear end of the vehicle bounces enough to concern me about the safety of the vehicle. i am particularly concerned about braking on wet roads going around curves. i just want the nhtsa to be aware of this issue. *jb | |||
| 03/16/2001 | 4 | 10/01/2000 | |
| At 8,900 miles excessive wear of front disc pads and rear drums due to defective rotors being out of round. dealer notified, and replaced rotors/ rear drums, and front disc pads. but, problem still occurring. *ak customer states heater not working, dealer found heater cable loose. *tt | |||
| 06/21/2001 | 1 | 02/01/2001 | |
| From contact with other owners of this vehicle there seems to be a failure pattern with the brakes on this vehicle. the brake drums and rotors appear to be warping and requiring replacement after approximately 4000 miles of use. toyota has issued tsb's to correct the problem but it does not appear to work from what other owners say. my son has the same vehicle and is on his third set of rotors with less than 15,000 miles on the truck. when i got my truck back with the new parts and applied the brakes on a long hill at 50 mph the vehicle went into a violent shaking motion and i thought control would be lost. it has not repeated this behavior but i question the safety of this vehicle.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS | |||
| 11/15/2009 | 175251 | 1 | |
| 2001 toyota tundra brake failure resulting in single vehicle accident running off the road into ditch and had to be towed. inspection photos available demonstrate brake line corrosion along with chasis and frame rust through. *tr updated 03/29/10 *bf | |||