Bulletins
| Bulletin | Bulletin date | Replacement Bulletin | Item no. | Summary | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | |||||
| 3031A | 01/01/2004 | 10009647 | Driver information center (dic) stays in bulb check. *tt | 10/14/2004 | |
| 02136 | 01/01/2004 | 10007811 | Intermittent battery light comes on, intermittent no crank. *tt | 07/12/2004 | |
| 00632 | 01/01/2004 | 10007620 | 4.3l l35 engine-diagnostic trouble code p0300 but no misfire can felt. *mj | 07/06/2004 | |
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | |||
| 04/10/2011 | 80246 | ||
| Ppotentially dangerous defect in the 2003 chevrolet astro van. the steering knuckle/arm is designed in a way that causes it to come into contact with a wiring harness when the vehicle is turned sharply to the left. over a period of time, this constant contact damages the wiring harness and allows the steering knuckle/arm to touch the wires inside the wiring harness. the wiring harness is connected directly to the battery so the end result is damage to other wires also sheathed in that wiring harness. two weeks ago, while pulling out of a grocery store parking space, everything died. the engine would not re-start and nothing electrical worked, from the door locks to the radio. everything was dead. we could smell burning wires and tried to get out of the vehicle. because the doors were locked we could not get them open. we had to manually push up our door locks; each of us pushing up the lock of our own door, so that we could get out of the vehicle. since then when the problem occurred, additional issue was that the abs light and brake light would come on and the brake pedal would sink to the floor. we came close to rear-ending someone several times. on april 23, 2011, we showed the damaged wiring harness to the mechanic at the chevrolet dealership. within two hours, we received a call to let us know the electronic control module (ecm) and the anti-lock brake (abs) module had been damaged. both had to be replaced at a cost of over $2,100. we contacted general motors customer service this morning. their response was that they considered this issue to be caused by | |||
| 08/02/2010 | 78000 | ||
| 2003 chevrolet astro van. drove vehicle without incident on august 1, 2010. monday morning august, 2, 2010 battery was dead (purchased new february 2010). replaced with new battery on august 2, 2010. first connected the positive cable. attempted to connect negative cable. negative post terminal sparked and battery cable got very hot. disconnected battery cable. inspected fuses. all good. trace visible portions of positive cable to fuse box, alternator, and starter. no indication of grounding. contacted mechanic who on august 14, 2010 performed test on fuse box, alternator, and starter. all good. mechanic thoroughly traced positive cable. discovered short located at the passenger side of the engine behind the steering linkage. stated that cable sheath had been worn away by the rubbing of the tie rod and was grounding out on the body and that it was extremely fortunate that the vehicle had not caught on fire. i had to have the vehicle towed to chevrolet dealership and had cable replaced. | |||
| 01/21/2006 | 1 | 05/29/2005 | |
| A fire started in the engine of 2003 astro van,the van was gm certified from the dealer, it was used with approx 17k miles with manufacturer warranty. the fire dept. report noted no arson involved, electrical short or malfunction cause of fire. gm has denied the claim with no report given to back up their decision. *jb | |||
| 05/15/2005 | 80600 | 7 | 02/21/2004 |
| I have a 2003 chevy astro. the problem started in january of 2005. the volts meter started dropping. i took it to phil smith chevrolet in lauderhill, florida. they did an electric diagnostic and found the alternator and battery to be bad. i changed the alternator and battery on my own. vehicle still had same problem afterwards. i then took my vehicle back to phil smith chevrolet, and they said that the battery cables were bad. i had them change them. the battery light was still coming on, and they said that it was okay, they just forgot to reset the light. everything was okay, except for the battery light still coming on, until may of 2005. when i accelerate from a complete stop, my vehicle stalls out, but starts right back up. i then brought my vehicle to trapp chevrolet in houma, la. they ran a diagnostic and said that the alternator was bad. so, i then changed the altenator again. i was still having the same problem. so i returned to trapp. they ran a diagnostic test again, and said that the fuel filter was out and distributor cap and rotor was out. i then changed the fuel filter, distributor cap, and rotor myself. i was still having the same problem. i then, returned to trapp chevrolet, and they said that they cannot find the problem, and the mechanic has driven the vehicle and sees the problem, but cannot find the problem. if i want them to continue working to find the problem, i have to pay for another diagnostic test, even though they haven't found the problem to begin with. | |||
| 09/03/2004 | 1 | 08/31/2004 | |
| Consumer stated that both she and her 2 year old child got burned by the interior bulb. it overheated and melted the housing around it. consumer's husband stated that it may have been a electrical wiring problem, and was afraid that the vehicle may catch on fire. *ak *nm | |||
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - BATTERY - CABLES | |||
| 09/09/2005 | 30900 | 2 | 01/03/2003 |
| On september 9, 2005 my 2003 chevrolet astro van exploded and caught fire in a parking lot. the fire dept. arrived and put out the fire; the firemen disconnected the battery cable. the van was towed to huffines chevrolet in plano, tx. the cause of the incident according to the chevrolet mechanics is as follows: 1) every time the steering wheel was turned, the tie rods etc. would chafe against a bracket on the chassis that held down a battery cable. 2) eventually the bracket failed. 3) the battery cable arced against the brake line. 4) the brake line ruptured spraying hydraulic fluid over the hot engine manifold. 5) the ensuing fire burned through, among other things, the a/c hose carrying freon. 6) when the a/c hosed was severed, the freon gas escaped causing the loud explosion that we heard some distance away. 7) the smoke that we saw in the air was actually the escaping freon gas. all was supposedly repaired in three weeks. on november 8, 2005, the brakes failed while under way. the chevrolet mechanics stated that the cause of the brake failure was traced to a small pinhole caused by the arcing battery cable several weeks ago. eventually the entire brake line failed. if this story seems preposterous to you, it does to me too but this is the story we got from chevrolet. in my opinion, my 2003 chevy astro van suffers from a fatal flaw in design and/or manufacturer. it is unsafe and should be taken off the road forever. *jb | |||
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - WIRING - INTERIOR/UNDER DASH | |||
| 11/24/2003 | 0 | 1 | 06/30/2003 |
| Earlier today i had my wife take in our 2003 chevrolet astro. the service light would not reset. this was the second time it came on and this time it would not reset by itself. while there i asked her to inquire about the sept. 2, 2003 recall of the astro van for a front suspension defect. recall number 03044. the dealership representative searched by using our vin. the search came back with no recall. i researched the recall on the nhtsa and called the chevrolet manufacturers 800 number for further assistance to find out if we would be included. i spoke with an operator by the name of angela. she did a quick search and told me that there was no recall also. i disclosed to her that i was looking at the recall at that moment on the nhtsa web sight. she then restated that there was no recall for my van but she could not guarantee that i would not be included in this recall. all i wanted to know was if my van was included in the recall. chevrolet tracks their vehicles. they know what parts are on which vans. they even know who bought them and where they are. now they will not disclose if my van is included in this recall. this is a great concern to my entire family because this is a van that my wife and children are in. is there some sort of code, rule, or law that they are breaking about not disclosing this to there consumers? please contact me as soon as possible. thank you, brett spindler 702-644-4671. *la | |||