Recalls


CampaignManufacturerManufacturing dateType# of units affectedDate Owner notified MfgRecall Initiated byManufacturers of recalled vehicles/productsReport Recieved DateRecord Creation DateRegulation Part NumberFMVSS Number
WHEELS - CAP/COVER/HUB
07E106000FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION E (Equipment)13000002/07/2008MFRGENERAL MOTORS CORP.12/17/200712/19/2007
Defect SummaryCertain federal-mogul replacement wheel hub assemblies with the brand names: national, carquest p/nos. 515020, 515021, 515025, 515053, 515054, 515059, and 515060, shipped between january 23, 2006, and december 20, 2007, sold for light duty and medium duty trucks. the inboard retention nut used to maintain hub bearing assembly can loosen resulting in an abs light indication, noise, and/or wheel separation.
Consequence SummaryWheel separation can result in a vehicle crash.
Corrective SummaryFederal-mogul will notify customers and will replace the hub assembly free of charge. the recall began on february 7, 2008. owners can contact federal-mogul toll-free at 877-489-6659.
NotesThis recall only pertains to replacement national, carquest wheel hub assemblies and has no relation to any original equipment installed on vehicles manufactured by general motors or ford.customers may contact the national highway traffic safety administration's vehicle safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (tty: 1-800-424-9153); or go to http://www.safercar.gov.

Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
WHEELS
05031000504/01/200510017339Handling characteristics of vehicles with 20 inch wheel/tire assemblies installed. *tt11/03/2005
304501/01/20043045A10009376Various steering or suspension concerns after gm accessories 20 inch tire/wheel assemblies have been installed. *tt09/27/2004
0190101/01/200410006473Excessive tire spin setting diagnostic trouble code (dtc) co542. also including 2002, 2003 sierra denali. *mr05/04/2004

Investigations


NHTSA IDManufacturerDate openDate closeSubjectRecall campaign
WHEELS
PE03026GENERAL MOTORS CORP.06/12/200311/03/2003STEEL WHEEL RIM FRACTURE
 There have been less than 2 complaints per 100,000 subject vehicles related to the alleged defect.the oldest vehicles (my 1999) have only 2 complaints in over 140 thousand vehicles after over 4 years in service.the rate of warranty claims potentially related to the alleged defect is less than 0.1%.there are no known incidents involving rapid loss of tire pressure or loss of vehicle control. a defect trend has not been identified at this time.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that no safety-related defect exists.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
WHEELS - MULTI PIECE
PE03026GENERAL MOTORS CORP.06/12/200311/03/2003STEEL WHEEL RIM FRACTURE
 There have been less than 2 complaints per 100,000 subject vehicles related to the alleged defect.the oldest vehicles (my 1999) have only 2 complaints in over 140 thousand vehicles after over 4 years in service.the rate of warranty claims potentially related to the alleged defect is less than 0.1%.there are no known incidents involving rapid loss of tire pressure or loss of vehicle control. a defect trend has not been identified at this time.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that no safety-related defect exists.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
WHEELS - RIM
PE03026GENERAL MOTORS CORP.06/12/200311/03/2003STEEL WHEEL RIM FRACTURE
 There have been less than 2 complaints per 100,000 subject vehicles related to the alleged defect.the oldest vehicles (my 1999) have only 2 complaints in over 140 thousand vehicles after over 4 years in service.the rate of warranty claims potentially related to the alleged defect is less than 0.1%.there are no known incidents involving rapid loss of tire pressure or loss of vehicle control. a defect trend has not been identified at this time.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that no safety-related defect exists.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances.

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
WHEELS
09/12/200444000108/25/2001
 Consumer was driving on the highway at approximately 66 mph the tire blew out. the front wheel assembly snapped off right behind the brake hub assembly. then, vehicle dropped down on its frame and skidded along the road for about 150 to 200 yards and then skidded into a guard rail. consumer contacted the manufacturer , and was told that the manufacturer will send someone to investigate the situation. currently, gm denied the claim.*ak right front wheel assembly broke off at the upper ball joint. *tc
01/14/2002
 Standard steel wheel on vehicle holds water, and when that water freezes wheels go out of balance. dealer contacted. *ak
WHEELS - CENTER SECTION
02/01/20051
 2002 chevy silverado brakes failed at low speeds. *ts when the consumer took the vehicle to the dealer to be inspected, he was informed there was a problem with the abs. the sensor was cleaned and a part was replaced. the consumer then received a recall notice in october 2005 regarding the abs. the recall letter stated the consumer could apply for reimbursement. the tailgate rusted and broke. the steering relay and right front idler arm were replaced. the window regulator was replaced. the wheel center cap fell off. *jb