Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
TIRES
09/21/2012201301
 September 21, 2012 i just happened to check the air pressure of the tires (just bought a new tire pressure gauge) when i noticed a large bulge on the front driver side tire. i took it to my toyota dealer in round rock tx as directed by my service advisor. he indicated that the tire was pinched or hit something to cause this bulge and that toyota would not replace it under its original warranty. he told me to take it to the firestone store next door and see if they would replace it under warranty. needless to say they claimed that it was a road hazard and would not replace it. now, my wife and i have been driving a combined 62 years and we've never had a new tire blister like this, granted all the tire that came with the car and the subsequent ones we purchased were michelins. lot of similar complaints on these bridgestone oem tires on the internet. *tr
07/26/2012103000
 Tl* the contact owns a 2011 toyota camry ce equipped with hankook optimo h727 tires, line size p205/65r/15. the contact stated that while traveling 60 mph the vehicle steered towards the left side of the road and smoke emitted from the passenger side rear tire. also, the contact stated that the tread completely detached from the tire. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. the failure and current mileage was 103,000.
07/26/2012103000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2011 toyota camry ce equipped with hankook optimo h727 tires, line size p205/65r/15. the contact stated that while traveling 60 mph the vehicle steered towards the left side of the road and smoke emitted from the passenger side rear tire. also, the contact stated that the tread completely detached from the tire. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. the failure and current mileage was 103,000. pmb
07/26/2012103000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2011 toyota camry ce , equipped with hankook optimo h727 tires p205 65r 15 . the contact stated while traveling 60 mph the vehicle steered towards the left side of the road and smoke emitted from the passenger side rear tire. the contact also stated tread completely detached from the tire. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. the failure and current mileages were 103,000 rds
12/16/2011104/01/2010
 2011 toyota camry. consumer writes in regards to problem with vehicle tires *tgw the consumer stated while having his 25,000 mile service check-up, the dealer informed him the tires needed to be replaced. the dealer stated the tires were showing signs of wear and indicated there was tire cupping as well, which was due to the vehicle being out of alignment. *jb
09/05/2011
 Tl* the contact owns a 2011 toyota camry equipped with bridgestone turanza tires, size p215-60-r16, dot number: obx8pm6. the contact was driving 60 mph when the steering wheel became resistant. the contact inspected the vehicle and found that the front passenger side tire blew due to blisters on the sidewall. the tire manufacturer advised the contact to take the vehicle back to the dealer. the dealer replaced the tire and advised the contact that the failure was due to road hazards. the tire failure mileage was 18,240. the vehicle failure mileage was unknown.
09/05/2011
 Tl-the contact owns a 2011 toyota camry equipped with bridgestone turanza tires, size p215-60-r16, dot number: obx8pm6. the contact was driving 60 mph when the steering wheel became resistant. the contact inspected the vehicle and found that the front passenger side tire blew due to blisters on the sidewall. the tire manufacturer advised the contact to take the vehicle back to the dealer. the dealer replaced the tire and advised the contact that the failure was due to road hazards. the tire failure mileage was 18,240. the vehicle failure mileage was unknown.
09/05/201118240
 Tl-the contact owns a 2011 toyota camry equipped with bridgestone turanza tires, size p215-60-r16, and dotobx8pm6. the contact stated while driving at 60mph the vehicle steering wheel became hard to turn the contact inspected the vehicle and found that the the passenger side front tire blew due to blister on the tire sidewall. the tire manufacturer advised to take the vehicle back to the dealer. the dealer replaced tire and stated the failure was due to road hazard. the tire failure mileage was 18,240. li