Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
SERVICE BRAKES
12/22/201215568
 I rented a toyota camry 2013 in december 2012. while sitting in the traffic at low speed, i noticed that the front vehicle suddenly stopped near the intersection of buchanan and us 93. i immediately slammed on the break pad while the cruiser was on, however, the break did not respond. the rental car did not slow down and kept moving forward. eventually, it hit the front vehicle. luckily, no one was injured because of low speed. if it were a normal functional car, the vehicle would have stopped because the speed was very low. but in this case, the rental car caused the accident because of its poor quality. the car was severely damaged. in contrast, the vehicle in the front, a suv, had no damage. after the accident, i checked the scene and did not find any tire break mark on the ground, which suggested that the brake system was not working properly. while driving on highway before the accident, i also noticed that the rental car had much slow response from the brake when the cruise was on, and the brake seemed to be much more sensitive when the cruise was off. in order to protect other drivers on highway, i strongly request nhtsa to launch an investigation on toyota camry
10/21/20125000
 Tl- the contact owns a 2012 toyota camry. the contact stated that the front brakes were loose and whenever the brake was depressed, the brake pads would move back and forth. the brake pads were smaller than the area of the caliper, causing them to become loose. the vehicle was taken to the dealer, who stated that there was nothing they could do for the failure. the manufacturer was notified and stated that there was not a defect in the vehicle. the contact files a claim with the manufacturer. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 5,000 and the current mileage 11,016. kmj
10/21/20125000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2012 toyota camry. the contact stated the front brakes are loose on the caliper. whenever the brake was depress the brake pads move back and forth. the brake pads are smaller than the area of the caliper and they become loose. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated there was nothing they can do for this failure. the manufacturer was notified who stated that was the design of the vehicle and it was not a defect. the contact files a claim#13022100440. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 5,000 and the current mileage 11,016. mw
01/27/2013161971
 I was moving cars in the driveway when i pulled the camry back in the brakes failed to stop the car and it struck the corner of the garage. i was not going fast enough to even trip the airbag. the dealer claims that there is nothing wrong with the brakes. i know that this same thing has happened in arlington, tx. what can i do to get the car fixed it is only 7 months old and still under warranty? *tr
01/27/201316197
 I was moving cars in the driveway when i pulled the camry back in the brakes failed to stop the car and it struck the corner of the garage. i was not going fast enough to even trip the airbag. the dealer claims that there is nothing wroung with the brakes. i know that this same thing has happened in arlington, tx. what can i do to get the car fixed it is only 7 months old and still under warranty?