Recalls
| Campaign | Manufacturer | Manufacturing date | Type | # of units affected | Date Owner notified Mfg | Recall Initiated by | Manufacturers of recalled vehicles/products | Report Recieved Date | Record Creation Date | Regulation Part Number | FMVSS Number | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | ||||||||||||||||
| 05V379000 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | from 01/01/2001 to 08/31/2002 | V (Vehicle) | 1353718 | 09/22/2005 | ODI | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 08/29/2005 | 08/29/2005 | |||||||
| Defect Summary | Certain pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles may experience unwanted antilock brake system (abs) activation. this condition is more likely to occur in environmentally corrosive areas. this recall will be launched in the salt belt states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, maryland, massachusetts, maine, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin and the district of columbia only. | |||||||||||||||
| Consequence Summary | This can cause increased stopping distances during low-speed brake applications, which could result in a crash. | |||||||||||||||
| Corrective Summary | Dealers are to remove the wheel speed sensor and thoroughly clean the wheel speed sensor mounting surface on the bearing, apply rust inhibitor to the cleaned surface, grease the mounting surface, reinstall the wheel speed sensor, and check the peak-to-peak output voltage to ensure the wheel speed signal is within specifications. the recall began september 22, 2005. owners may contact chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 or gmc at 1-866-996-9463. | |||||||||||||||
| Notes | Gm recall no. 05068. gm revised the involved vehicles by amending the original 573 report on october 4, 2005. gm revised the original 573 report on december 16, 2005, to include additional states and vehicle population.customers may also contact the national highway traffic safety administration's vehicle safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (tty 1-800-424-9153), or go to http://www.safercar.gov. | |||||||||||||||
Bulletins
| Bulletin | Bulletin date | Replacement Bulletin | Item no. | Summary | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR | |||||
| 020526001B | 01/01/2005 | 020526001C | 10006115 | Rear parking brake shoe retaining spring clip service kit for drum-in-hat (dih) equipped vehicles. *tt update. *tt | 04/16/2004 |
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - ANTILOCK - ABS WARNING LIGHT | |||||
| 040525002 | 06/01/2007 | 040525002D | 10022470 | Abs light on, dtc's c0265, c0201, u1041 set and/or loss of communication with brake module. (reground ebcm ground). *kb | 08/15/2007 |
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - ANTILOCK - WHEEL SPEED SENSOR | |||||
| 3455 | 10017232 | Supplement to 04094 front wheel speed sensor corrosion. *tt | 10/28/2005 | ||
| 05068 | 09/01/2005 | 10016715 | Product safety recall regarding front wheel speed sensor corrosion. *tt | 09/28/2005 | |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||||
| 040523005 | 06/01/2004 | 10012141 | Availability of rear wheel mud flaps to reduce debris build-up on rear brake calipers and/or rear wheels. *tt | 02/15/2005 | |
| 040523001A | 10/01/2004 | 040523001 | 10011125 | Low brake pedal, red brake light on, brake system warning message on. *tt updated *eh | 01/03/2005 |
| 000523005B | 06/01/2003 | 000523005A | 10002132 | Right rear inner brake pad wear. various modles including the 2004 silverado and sierra. *tt | 08/13/2003 |
| 020523004 | 10/01/2002 | 10000572 | Some vehicles may exhibit a reduced brake power message on the driver's information center (dic). *tt | 03/25/2003 | |
| 020522004 | 09/01/2002 | 10000067 | Trailer brakes applied when headlights / park lamps are on, brake controller illumination. *tt | 02/12/2003 | |
| 020522004A | 09/01/2002 | 020522004 | 10000061 | Trailer brakes applied when headlights / park lamps are on, brake controller illumination. *tt | 02/10/2003 |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | |||||
| 030525007 | 05/01/2009 | 030525007D | 10004310 | Antilock brake (abs) activation at low speeds (clean wheel speed sensor mounting surface). *tt updated 10/23/09. *pe | 12/02/2003 |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - CONTROL UNIT/MODULE | |||||
| 040525002B | 11/01/2005 | 040525002C | 10008659 | Anti-lock brake system (abs) light on, diagnostic trouble codes (dtcs) c0265, c0201, u1041 set and/or loss of communication with brake module. *tt update. *tt | 08/13/2004 |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS | |||||
| 180202 | 02/18/2002 | 629811 | Customers may comment about a brake squeak or a noise, particularly after a cold soak and on the first brake application. *tt | 04/09/2002 | |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - SWITCHES - BRAKE WARNING | |||||
| 100901 | 09/10/2001 | 626161 | Vehicles may experience the brake system warning light not illuminating. *slc | 12/13/2001 | |
Investigations
| NHTSA ID | Manufacturer | Date open | Date close | Subject | Recall campaign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | ||||||
| PE10010 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 03/30/2010 | 01/05/2011 | Brake line corrosion failure | ||
| The office of defects investigation (odi) received defect petition dp10-003 on march 2, 2010, requesting the investigation of model year (my) 2003 chevrolet silverado 2500hd 4wd pickup trucks for corrosion failures of the vehicle brake lines.dp10-003 was granted and on march 30, 2010, preliminary evaluation pe10-010 was opened on more than six million model year 1999 through 2003 light trucks and sport utility vehicles manufactured and sold by general motors corporation (gm).on july 2, 2010, odi received gm's response to an information request, which included gm's assessment of the frequency and safety consequences of the alleged defect. gm stated that:(1) the brake system of the subject vehicles is split front/rear and should a brake pipe suddenly fail for any reason, the affected vehicle would be capable of stopping with the pressure supplied by the remaining circuit; (2) the subject vehicles were designed to meet the hydraulic circuit partial failure requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standards 105 and 135, light vehicle brake systems; and (3) should a brake fluid leak occur for any reason, the brake system malfunction indicator lamp (mil) would illuminate and warn the driver before the brake fluid level was low enough to cause a loss of line pressure.odi's and gm's analysis indicates that 85 percent of the complaints occurred on vehicles used primarily in states that use salt on the roads during winter months (connecticut, delaware, district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia and wisconsin).overall the complaint rates per 100,000 vehicles for salt belt states is 43.0 and non-salt belt is 3.0.in approximately 25 percent of the complaints the brake pipe failure occurred suddenly, with no warning (i.e., no mil, brake fluid loss warning), and resulted in extended stopping distances.in 30 of these the increase in stopping distance that resulted was a factor in the crash and in 10 others the vehicle was intentionally steered off the road or into another lane of travel in order to avoid a crash.this investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis (ea11-001) for subject vehicles sold or currently registered in salt belt states to further assess the scope, frequency and safety risks associated with sudden failures of corroded brake pipes that can result in decreased brake effectiveness. odi will continue to gather information on subject vehicles outside the salt belt as well. | ||||||
| PE10010 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 03/30/2010 | Brake line failure due to corrosion | |||
| The office of defects investigation (odi) received a defect petition on march 2, 2010, requesting the investigation of model year (my) 2003 chevrolet silverado 2500hd 4wd pickup trucks for corrosion failures of the vehicle brake lines.the petitioner alleged a sudden loss of brake effectiveness and extended stopping distance after a corroded brake burst during a brake application. odi has received 110 owner complaints for my 1999 through 2003 chevrolet and gmc c/k series pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, including 3 involving my 2003 2500 series heavy-duty pickup trucks.the complaints allege the loss of braking effectiveness due to brake line rupture because of corrosion.in 37 of these complaints, the brake line failure was confirmed by a dealer inspection.three complaints allege that corroded brake line failure resulted in a crash.a preliminary evaluation has been opened to determine the frequency, scope and safety consequences of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | ||||||
| PE05020 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 04/28/2005 | 09/13/2005 | UNWANTED LOW-SPEED ABS ACTIVATION | 05V379000 | |
| In a letter dated august 29, 2005, gm notified odi that it was recalling certain model year 1999 through 2002 c/k pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles to correct a problem with anti-lock brake system (abs) wheel speed sensor corrosion that may result in unwanted abs activation and extended stopping distances during low-speed braking (recall 05v-379).gm's recall covers approximately 804,000 vehicles currently registered in the following 14 salt-belt states:connecticut, illinois, indiana, massachusetts, maine, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, and west virginia.the recall procedure will involve removing the sensor, cleaning the mounting surface, applying a rust inhibitor (zinc-x) to the surface, and reinstalling the sensor.if necessary, the sensor will be replaced. the population and failure report data given in this resume are for the full region that has been considered by odi as the salt-belt.that includes delaware, iowa, maryland, minnesota, missouri, wisconsin and the district of columbia in addition to the 14 states included in 05v-379.the states covered by gm's recall have the highest incident rates for the subject condition, accounting for 91% of the incidents, but only 24% of subject vehicle sales in the united states.odi's analysis determined that 840 of the complaints, 244 of the crashes, and 16 of the injuries identified in this investigation occurred in those states.the resulting incident and crash rates are 96.2 and 28.0 per 100,000 vehicles respectively (note:rates are based on vehicle sales, not registered vehicles). the corresponding numbers in the excluded portions of the salt-belt are 399,000 vehicles, 81 incidents (20.3 per 100,000 vehicles), 3 crashes, and no injuries.the statistics in the remaining 30 states are 2,406,000 vehicles, 168 incidents (7.0 per 100,000 vehicles), 31 crashes, and one injury.gm and odi are continuing to monitor the problem experience in states that are not included in the recall.gm will provide odi with updated complaint, field report, and warranty data in november 2005.odi and gm will review that data and assess the appropriateness of the current scope of the recall at that time. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - CONTROL UNIT/MODULE | ||||||
| PE05020 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 04/28/2005 | 09/13/2005 | UNWANTED LOW-SPEED ABS ACTIVATION | 05V379000 | |
| In a letter dated august 29, 2005, gm notified odi that it was recalling certain model year 1999 through 2002 c/k pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles to correct a problem with anti-lock brake system (abs) wheel speed sensor corrosion that may result in unwanted abs activation and extended stopping distances during low-speed braking (recall 05v-379).gm's recall covers approximately 804,000 vehicles currently registered in the following 14 salt-belt states:connecticut, illinois, indiana, massachusetts, maine, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, and west virginia.the recall procedure will involve removing the sensor, cleaning the mounting surface, applying a rust inhibitor (zinc-x) to the surface, and reinstalling the sensor.if necessary, the sensor will be replaced. the population and failure report data given in this resume are for the full region that has been considered by odi as the salt-belt.that includes delaware, iowa, maryland, minnesota, missouri, wisconsin and the district of columbia in addition to the 14 states included in 05v-379.the states covered by gm's recall have the highest incident rates for the subject condition, accounting for 91% of the incidents, but only 24% of subject vehicle sales in the united states.odi's analysis determined that 840 of the complaints, 244 of the crashes, and 16 of the injuries identified in this investigation occurred in those states.the resulting incident and crash rates are 96.2 and 28.0 per 100,000 vehicles respectively (note:rates are based on vehicle sales, not registered vehicles). the corresponding numbers in the excluded portions of the salt-belt are 399,000 vehicles, 81 incidents (20.3 per 100,000 vehicles), 3 crashes, and no injuries.the statistics in the remaining 30 states are 2,406,000 vehicles, 168 incidents (7.0 per 100,000 vehicles), 31 crashes, and one injury.gm and odi are continuing to monitor the problem experience in states that are not included in the recall.gm will provide odi with updated complaint, field report, and warranty data in november 2005.odi and gm will review that data and assess the appropriateness of the current scope of the recall at that time. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - POWER ASSIST - HYDRAULIC - HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS | ||||||
| PE10010 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 03/30/2010 | 01/05/2011 | Brake line corrosion failure | ||
| The office of defects investigation (odi) received defect petition dp10-003 on march 2, 2010, requesting the investigation of model year (my) 2003 chevrolet silverado 2500hd 4wd pickup trucks for corrosion failures of the vehicle brake lines.dp10-003 was granted and on march 30, 2010, preliminary evaluation pe10-010 was opened on more than six million model year 1999 through 2003 light trucks and sport utility vehicles manufactured and sold by general motors corporation (gm).on july 2, 2010, odi received gm's response to an information request, which included gm's assessment of the frequency and safety consequences of the alleged defect. gm stated that:(1) the brake system of the subject vehicles is split front/rear and should a brake pipe suddenly fail for any reason, the affected vehicle would be capable of stopping with the pressure supplied by the remaining circuit; (2) the subject vehicles were designed to meet the hydraulic circuit partial failure requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standards 105 and 135, light vehicle brake systems; and (3) should a brake fluid leak occur for any reason, the brake system malfunction indicator lamp (mil) would illuminate and warn the driver before the brake fluid level was low enough to cause a loss of line pressure.odi's and gm's analysis indicates that 85 percent of the complaints occurred on vehicles used primarily in states that use salt on the roads during winter months (connecticut, delaware, district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia and wisconsin).overall the complaint rates per 100,000 vehicles for salt belt states is 43.0 and non-salt belt is 3.0.in approximately 25 percent of the complaints the brake pipe failure occurred suddenly, with no warning (i.e., no mil, brake fluid loss warning), and resulted in extended stopping distances.in 30 of these the increase in stopping distance that resulted was a factor in the crash and in 10 others the vehicle was intentionally steered off the road or into another lane of travel in order to avoid a crash.this investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis (ea11-001) for subject vehicles sold or currently registered in salt belt states to further assess the scope, frequency and safety risks associated with sudden failures of corroded brake pipes that can result in decreased brake effectiveness. odi will continue to gather information on subject vehicles outside the salt belt as well. | ||||||
| PE10010 | GENERAL MOTORS CORP. | 03/30/2010 | Brake line failure due to corrosion | |||
| The office of defects investigation (odi) received a defect petition on march 2, 2010, requesting the investigation of model year (my) 2003 chevrolet silverado 2500hd 4wd pickup trucks for corrosion failures of the vehicle brake lines.the petitioner alleged a sudden loss of brake effectiveness and extended stopping distance after a corroded brake burst during a brake application. odi has received 110 owner complaints for my 1999 through 2003 chevrolet and gmc c/k series pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, including 3 involving my 2003 2500 series heavy-duty pickup trucks.the complaints allege the loss of braking effectiveness due to brake line rupture because of corrosion.in 37 of these complaints, the brake line failure was confirmed by a dealer inspection.three complaints allege that corroded brake line failure resulted in a crash.a preliminary evaluation has been opened to determine the frequency, scope and safety consequences of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles. | ||||||
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES | |||
| 02/11/2013 | 143500 | 1 | |
| The brake lines in my 2002 gmc sierra truck have corroded to the point that fluid is being lost and braking is being negatively affected. this was found during a routine oil change, luckily there was not a incident on the road. my truck is well maintained, i understand there are thousands of other complaints. *tr | |||
| 02/11/2013 | 143500 | ||
| The brake lines in my 2002 gmc sierra truck have corroded to the point that fluid is being lost and braking is being negatively afftected. this was found during a routine oil change, luckily there was not a incident on the road. my truck is well maintained, i understand there are thousands of other complaints | |||
| 01/17/2013 | 82500 | 1 | |
| Description: 2002 gmc sierra?82,xxx.00 miles. while dropping my daughter off at school, i stopped at a light, accelerated to make it up the hill, and as i came over the horizon i proceeded to stop, when i depressed my brake pedal to slow down, the pedal went right to the floor. i almost ran into another vehicle and had i not thrown the car into low gear, and depressed my emergency brake, i am certain that we would have smashed into the school bus in front of us. my wife called aaa, and had the car towed to the local gmc dealer. it seems that the entire brake line system is rusted out, and that this was the first line to blow. they had the audacity to tell my wife that the repairs would start at $3,300.00 and would not guaranty that it could not be more expensive than that!. we take good care of the truck, last year we had all the brakes done, new tires, and recently had a new head gasket installed, and the oil changed, so it is obvious that the dealer does not ever do a thorough vehicle inspection. we cannot afford the shell out the money for these repairs, and i am hopeful that there has been some kind of a recall for this, since i see so many complaints about the same subject? please help! *tr | |||
| 01/17/2013 | 82500 | ||
| Description: 2002 gmc sierra | |||
| 11/26/2012 | 149675 | 1 | |
| I was lucky and not moving when this occurred for the second time. once again i was getting ready to leave in my truck when i stepped on the brake pedal to shift out of park and the brake pedal went to the floor. should i take my chances on this happening a third time? perhaps i won't be so lucky and there may be an accident involved along with possible injury or death. i did find a recall for tailgate straps for this truck but not for corroded brake lines that are bursting? i find that to be unacceptable. what are the chances of someone dying from corroded tailgate straps? this is an incredible safety issue affecting millions of trucks and there needs to be a recall issued to have these brake lines replaced with stainless steel so as not to have this problem repeated in the future. *tr | |||
| 11/11/2011 | 125000 | 1 | |
| I stepped on the brake pedal to shift the truck from out of park and the pedal went to the floor. i got out of the truck and found a puddle of fluid in the area in front of the drivers side rear tire. it appeared as though the brake line going to the back brakes ruptured in the area behind the gas tank. *tr | |||
| 11/26/2012 | 149675 | ||
| I was lucky and not moving when this occurred for the second time. once again i was getting ready to leave in my truck when i stepped on the brake pedal to shift out of park and the brake pedal went to the floor. should i take my chances on this happening a third time? perhaps i won't be so lucky and there may be an accident involved along with possible injury or death. i did find a recall for tailgate straps for this truck but not for corroded brake lines that are bursting? i find that to be unacceptable. what are the chances of someone dying from corroded tailgate straps? this is an incredible safety issue affecting millions of trucks and there needs to be a recall issued to have these brake lines replaced with stainless steel so as not to have this problem repeated in the future. | |||
| 11/11/2011 | 125000 | ||
| I stepped on the brake pedal to shift the truck from out of park and the pedal went to the floor. i got out of the truck and found a puddle of fluid in the area in front of the drivers side rear tire. it appeared as though the brake line going to the back brakes ruptured in the area behind the gas tank. | |||
| 11/26/2012 | 149675 | ||
| I was lucky and not moving when this occurred for the second time. once again i was getting ready to leave in my truck when i stepped on the brake pedal to shift out of park and the brake pedal went to the floor. should i take my chances on this happening a third time? perhaps i won't be so lucky and there may be an accident involved along with possible injury or death. i did find a recall for tailgate straps for this truck but not for corroded brake lines that are bursting? i find that to be unacceptable. what are the chances of someone dying from corroded tailgate straps? this is an incredible safety issue affecting millions of trucks and there needs to be a recall issued to have these brake lines replaced with stainless steel so as not to have this problem repeated in the future. | |||
| 11/11/2011 | 125000 | ||
| I stepped on the brake pedal to shift the truck from out of park and the pedal went to the floor. i got out of the truck and found a puddle of fluid in the area in front of the drivers side rear tire. it appeared as though the brake line going to the back brakes ruptured in the area behind the gas tank. | |||
| 11/26/2012 | 149675 | ||
| I was lucky and not moving when this occurred for the second time. once again i was getting ready to leave in my truck when i stepped on the brake pedal to shift out of park and the brake pedal went to the floor. should i take my chances on this happening a third time? perhaps i won't be so lucky and there may be an accident involved along with possible injury or death. i did find a recall for tailgate straps for this truck but not for corroded brake lines that are bursting? i find that to be unacceptable. what are the chances of someone dying from corroded tailgate straps? this is an incredible safety issue affecting millions of trucks and there needs to be a recall issued to have these brake lines replaced with stainless steel so as not to have this problem repeated in the future. | |||
| 11/11/2011 | 125000 | ||
| I stepped on the brake pedal to shift the truck from out of park and the pedal went to the floor. i got out of the truck and found a puddle of fluid in the area in front of the drivers side rear tire. it appeared as though the brake line going to the back brakes ruptured in the area behind the gas tank. | |||
| 06/15/2011 | 40000 | ||
| Tl* the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. the contact stated that while parked on an incline the contact activated the parking brake and noticed it would not engage. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. there was a recall under nhtsa campaign id number: 05v161000 (parking brake) that may be related to the failure. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated the vin was not included in the recall. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 40,000. | |||
| 06/15/2011 | 40000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. the contact stated that while parked on an incline the contact activated the parking brake and noticed it would not engage. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. there was a recall under nhtsa campaign id number: 05v161000 (parking brake) that may be related to the failure. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated the vin was not included in the recall. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 40,000. pmb | |||
| 06/15/2011 | 40000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. while parked on an incline the contact activated the parking brake and noticed it would not engage. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. there was a recall under nhtsa campaign id number: 05v161000 (parking brake) that may be related to the failure. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated the vin was not included in the recall. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 40,000. da | |||
| 09/28/2012 | 99000 | 1 | |
| While driving my 2002 gmc sierra i depressed the brake peddle to stop at a red light. the brake peddle went all the way to the floor and the truck continued forward. i swerved off the road to miss hitting the car in front of me. after inspecting under the truck i noticed one of my brake lines had rusted completely threw and the rest didn't look much better. *tr | |||
| 09/28/2012 | 99000 | ||
| While driving my 2002 gmc sierra i depressed the brake peddle to stop at a red light. the brake peddle went all the way to the floor and the truck continued forward. i swerved off the road to miss hitting the car in front of me. after inspecting under the truck i noticed one of my brake lines had rusted completely threw and the rest didn't look much better. | |||
| 08/04/2012 | 135205 | 1 | |
| While traveling out of state, the brake pedal suddenly went completely to the floor. fortunately, the truck was stopped at the time. repairs estimated by sears indicated that all lines should be replaced as well as parking brake parts due to severe corrosion. had the ruptured line replaced along with caliper at the affected wheel. will have to have all remaining lines replaced to be sure the vehicle can be driven safely. the technicians who worked on the vehicle indicated it is extremely corroded compared to other vehicles of it's age and mileage. *tr | |||
| 08/04/2012 | 135205 | ||
| While traveling out of state, the brake pedal suddenly went completely to the floor. fortunately, the truck was stopped at the time. repairs estimated by sears indicated that all lines should be replaced as well as parking brake parts due to severe corrosion. had the ruptured line replaced along with caliper at the affected wheel. will have to have all remaining lines replaced to be sure the vehicle can be driven safely. the technicians who worked on the vehicle indicated it is extremely corroded compared to other vehicles of it's age and mileage. | |||
| 07/27/2012 | 40000 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. the contact stated that while driving 35 mph, he applied the brakes and the pedal depressed to the floor. the contact maneuvered to the shoulder and then applied the emergency brake to stop the vehicle. upon exiting the vehicle, the contact noticed that brake fluid was leaking from the brake lines. the vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop and the contact was informed that the brake lines fractured. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer offered no assistance. the failure mileage was 40,000. sm. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - ANTILOCK | |||
| 05/16/2005 | 40000 | 200 | 04/01/2002 |
| Brake abs system is activating at low speeds. often when i come to a stop from 5-20mph the abs system activates for no reason on dry, clean roads. several times i've narrowly exscaped an accident. the truck doesn't want to stop at all when the abs activates. | |||
| 04/30/2005 | 32060 | 7 | |
| Anti lock brakes kick in and vehicle doesn't stop! | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - ANTILOCK - CONTROL UNIT/MODULE | |||
| 05/01/2005 | 45000 | ||
| Possible brake speed sensor failure 2002 gmc siera denali pickup | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - ANTILOCK - WHEEL SPEED SENSOR | |||
| 06/13/2005 | 54000 | 15 | 12/11/2003 |
| When you are going 3 to 6 miles per hour going slow or coming to a stop the abs system fails causing the brakes not to work, you have to push really hard on the pedal just to get it to slow down. i,ve talked to other people who have gmc and chevy pick-ups and they have had the same problem.this is something the should be repaired by gm before someone is killed.i also found out today that canada has issussed a recall for this problem. does it take someone to get killed or injured be the nhtsa does something? | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||
| 04/18/2012 | 108000 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra 2500hd. the contact stated that the front brake lines failed and the rear lines were very close to failing. the contact took the vehicle to the dealer for service and was informed of the failures. the failure and current mileages were 108,000. the vin was not available. sm. | |||
| 04/18/2012 | 108000 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra 2500hd. the contact stated that the front brake lines failed and the rear are very close to failing. the contact took the vehicle to the dealer for service and was told of the failures. the vin was not available. the failure mileage and current mileages were 108,000.rl | |||
| 01/13/2012 | 98000 | ||
| The brakes locked up when pulling into parking lot of store. | |||
| 12/23/2011 | 154000 | ||
| The metalic brake line tubing ruptured causing brake failure while traveling 50 mph on a downgrade. the metal line above the rear axle, passenger side, corroded through and spewed brake fluid all over. the corrosion point is about 7-10 inches forward of the junction where the brake line transitions to rubber hose that goes to the rear axle junction. there is also an unusual amount of corrosion on the gas fuel filter fittings located just forward of the gasoline tank. i was able to slow and stop by downshifting and using the emergency brake. brake lines should not corrode and fail in any climate on a 9 year old truck! they should not corrode period. | |||
| 12/03/2011 | 147000 | ||
| Both the driver side and rear brake lines, because of rust, burst at the same time. it was lucky the car was not on the road.i have replaced all the lines and had to replace the front calipers because the bleeding nippled were completly gone due to rust. the rear calipers were in good shape.over the course of ownership, i have had to forcefully remove the tires from the hub because they were rusted to the hub. again i was lucky that i did this work at home and would have been in serious trouble had i been forced to change tires due to a flat. it also appears the truck frame is showing advance rusting for its age and milelage. | |||
| 10/25/2011 | 109963 | ||
| Hydraulic brake line corrosion: the brake lines became so corroded that i was losing approximately 16 oz.of fluid every 1000 miles.the corrosion was so bad that the bleeders on the front calipers had rusted off and had to be replaced as well as all of the brake lines.this resulted in a repair bill of $701.31.only time will tell when the remaining lines and calipers will need replacing.only a few weeks ago the service mgr. at this location told me i probably had the best looking 2002 gmc pick-up in the u.s. so neglect is not at fault here. | |||
| 11/06/2011 | 125788 | ||
| Backing up to the garage put brake on didnt stop, i thought i would hit the garage put i did get stop in time. steel line rusted, blown line on back brakes | |||
| 10/25/2011 | 109963 | ||
| Hydraulic brake line corrosion: the brake lines became so corroded that i was losing approximately 16 oz.of fluid every 1000 miles.the corrosion was so bad that the bleeders on the front calipers had rusted off and had to be replaced as well as all of the brake lines.this resulted in a repair bill of $701.31.only time will tell when the remaining lines and calipers will need replacing.only a few weeks ago the service mgr. at this location told me i probably had the best looking 2002 gmc pick-up in the u.s. so neglect is not at fault here. | |||
| 11/06/2011 | 125788 | ||
| Backing up to the garage put brake on didnt stop, i thought i would hit the garage put i did get stop in time. steel line rusted, blown line on back brakes | |||
| 10/25/2011 | 109963 | ||
| Hydraulic brake line corrosion: the brake lines became so corroded that i was losing approximately 16 oz.of fluid every 1000 miles.the corrosion was so bad that the bleeders on the front calipers had rusted off and had to be replaced as well as all of the brake lines.this resulted in a repair bill of $701.31.only time will tell when the remaining lines and calipers will need replacing.only a few weeks ago the service mgr. at this location told me i probably had the best looking 2002 gmc pick-up in the u.s. so neglect is not at fault here. | |||
| 11/06/2011 | 125788 | ||
| Backing up to the garage put brake on didnt stop, i thought i would hit the garage put i did get stop in time. steel line rusted, blown line on back brakes | |||
| 10/25/2011 | 109963 | ||
| Hydraulic brake line corrosion: the brake lines became so corroded that i was losing approximately 16 oz.of fluid every 1000 miles.the corrosion was so bad that the bleeders on the front calipers had rusted off and had to be replaced as well as all of the brake lines.this resulted in a repair bill of $701.31.only time will tell when the remaining lines and calipers will need replacing.only a few weeks ago the service mgr. at this location told me i probably had the best looking 2002 gmc pick-up in the u.s. so neglect is not at fault here. | |||
| 11/06/2011 | 125788 | ||
| Backing up to the garage put brake on didnt stop, i thought i would hit the garage put i did get stop in time. steel line rusted, blown line on back brakes | |||
| 10/17/2011 | 66628 | ||
| Stepped on the brake to put the truck in gear when it was noticed that the brake pedal went all the way to the floor! backed up, pulled forward, there were no brakes! vehicle was carefully driven home using back roads and transmission braking along with limited pedal braking. brake light came on just before arriving at home, 10 miles down the road. the truck is presently in an independent repair facility. all metal brake lines are to be replaced at significant cost to me. upon inspection it is apparent that the brake lines are more of substandard material. all metal lines show excessive corrosion and deterioration for a vehicle of this age and mileage. the truck is my wife's and was rarely driven during winter months. | |||
| 10/25/2011 | 109963 | ||
| Hydraulic brake line corrosion: the brake lines became so corroded that i was losing approximately 16 oz.of fluid every 1000 miles.the corrosion was so bad that the bleeders on the front calipers had rusted off and had to be replaced as well as all of the brake lines.this resulted in a repair bill of $701.31.only time will tell when the remaining lines and calipers will need replacing.only a few weeks ago the service mgr. at this location told me i probably had the best looking 2002 gmc pick-up in the u.s. so neglect is not at fault here. | |||
| 11/06/2011 | 125788 | ||
| Backing up to the garage put brake on didnt stop, i thought i would hit the garage put i did get stop in time. steel line rusted, blown line on back brakes | |||
| 10/17/2011 | 66628 | ||
| Stepped on the brake to put the truck in gear when it was noticed that the brake pedal went all the way to the floor! backed up, pulled forward, there were no brakes! vehicle was carefully driven home using back roads and transmission braking along with limited pedal braking. brake light came on just before arriving at home, 10 miles down the road. the truck is presently in an independent repair facility. all metal brake lines are to be replaced at significant cost to me. upon inspection it is apparent that the brake lines are more of substandard material. all metal lines show excessive corrosion and deterioration for a vehicle of this age and mileage. the truck is my wife's and was rarely driven during winter months. | |||
| 10/16/2011 | 108000 | ||
| Brake line burst open while applying brake to park vehicle on an incline. brake pedal went straight to the floor. line was leaking where lines run along the frame under the drivers side front door. after further inspection all brake lines are extremely corroded and near rusted through. | |||
| 07/12/2010 | 83000 | ||
| Brake lines are rusted out badly and one rear left line rotted through and began to leak. when the brake lines were inspected all the brake lines were found to be severely rusted. | |||
| 08/04/2011 | 101950 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. the contact stated that the vehicle was taken to a private mechanic for service and the mechanic stated that there was rust found in the driver | |||
| 08/04/2011 | 101950 | ||
| Tl- the contact owns a 2002 general motor company sierra. the contact stated the vehicle was taken to private mechanic for service, and the mechanic stated their was rust found in both the driver side brake baking plate and the brake line. the private mechanic also stated their may be safety failures with the suspension, and the brake pedal, due to the pedal was depressed all the way to the floor. before working properly. the contact also stated the safety belts fail to open and close properly. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer, and the manufacturer was not contacted. the vehicle was not repaired.the failure and current mileage was 101,950. rds | |||
| 05/05/2009 | 49986 | ||
| Tl* the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. the contact was driving 10 mph and applied the brakes but the vehicle began to lose braking power abnormally. the contact took the vehicle to a local mechanic to have the brake system bled and the pads replaced yet the repairs only resolved the failure temporary and the failure recurred. the contact referenced nhtsa campaign id number: 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock) but the contacts vin was not included due to the state in which he lived. the failure was not further repaired. the failure mileage was 49,986. | |||
| 05/05/2009 | 50 | ||
| Tl. the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. the contact stated while driving at 10 mph while brake vehicle losses it's braking power. the contact took the vehicle to a local mechanic to have the brake system bleed and the pads replaced. the repaired resolved temporary. the vehicle started to lose braking power again. the contact notice a nhtsa campaign id number : 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock) but due to the state and vin number the vehicle was not include. the failure mileage was 49,986. jo | |||
| 11/27/2010 | 110000 | ||
| Brake line tubing | |||
| 12/12/2010 | 35000 | ||
| Tl-the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. the contact stated that while driving approximately 5 mph and entering a car port to her home her brakes failed and she crashed into the front corner of her house. no one was injured in the crash. the contact stated that no warning lights illuminated on the instrumental panel prior or after the failure. the police were not called out to the scene. the vehicle has not been inspected by a dealer nor has it been repaired. the failure mileage was approximately 35,000. the vin was unavailable. tb | |||
| 09/15/2010 | 130543 | ||
| Brake failure. sudden brake pedal to floor.brake fluid on ground in area under driver. towed to dealer.dealer replaced rusted out front brake lines from ebcm to both front wheels. | |||
| 10/04/2009 | 40000 | 1 | |
| My antilocking brakes have been activating during slow turning stops and i am not able to stop. i ran over a curve pulling into a packing lot. i almost hit another car pulling into the gas station. i called the gm dealer who said it was not covered under warranty and this has not been under a recall. so i disconnected the antilocking brakes and now the problem is gone. and good thing i did because that same day i was pulling into traffic and did not see an oncoming car because it did not have it | |||
| 08/11/2009 | 34000 | 1 | |
| Brake lines from master cylinder to abs unit failed due to rust on my 2002 gmc sierra pickup truck with less than 35,000 miles on it. have not driven nor can i safely drive truck since the incident happened. haven not repaired as of yet as i am exploring my options. *tr | |||
| 05/01/2008 | 85000 | 1 | |
| 2002 gmc sierra. just as the vehicle is about to stop the anti-lock brakes seem to release and the vehicle travels around 10 to 15 feet without being able to stop. very disconcerning. *tr | |||
| 06/06/2008 | 52000 | 1 | |
| The brakes on my 2002 gmc sierra are not working right. when i approach a stop the brake pedal goes all the way down and then the abs engages. *tr | |||
| 10/11/2004 | 4 | 06/13/2002 | |
| 2002 sierra rear brakes rusted. front brake system had to have the rotors resurfaced due to rust and the speed sensors were corroded, calipers also rusted. *ts *jb | |||
| 01/05/2005 | 33251 | 1 | 09/12/2002 |
| Rusted anti lock brakes are wearing out hubcaps and brake assembly. consumer will need to take vehicle to dealership to be replaced. *ak *sb the front brakes wore out and damage on rotor. the front brake pads and right rotor were replaced. the rear brakes wore out. the rear pads were replaced and the rotors were resurfaced. *nm | |||
| 07/24/2004 | 24000 | 2 | 02/01/2002 |
| While driving in the city while it was raining at 10 mph, the vehicle in front of the consumer stopped and the consumers brakes failed and hit the vehicle in front. *ak (4/24/05) while in the rain the consumer had come off of the interstate going 20 mph and the brakes failed again. the vehicle was regularly serviced by the dealer. the vehicle was taken to the dealer on 4/28/05. the dealer reported that the vehicle needed front and rear pads, the front rotors need machining, the rear rotors needed replacing , and four wheel calipers needed to be serviced. the dealer stated that the pads were 70% worn. the consumer stated that the rear brakes have pad squeakers but they could not be heard. the consumer had taken the rear wheel off and saw the rear pad was completely metal to, and rear. the consumer made the repairs as well serviced the calipers. *sc *jb | |||
| 03/11/2003 | 10000 | 6 | |
| While driving at any speed and when brakes were hot there was a problem with stopping. this condition occurred six times. dealer claimed that this was normal for this vehicle.*ak | |||
| 08/25/1997 | 5000 | 1 | |
| When the consumer backed out of a parking space, the brake pedal traveled to the floor. *jb | |||
| 04/23/2003 | 30000 | ||
| There was a loud noise when the brakes were applied. the vehicle was taken to the dealer and the dealer felt that the brakes had a manufacturers defect due to open drums. *nlm | |||
| 04/28/2003 | 1 | ||
| The rear brakes had to be replaced every seven months. *jb | |||
| 01/28/2003 | 1 | ||
| The brakes squeaked when applied. the dealer replaced the rear brake shoes and clips. *jb | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | |||
| 01/02/2008 | 69900 | 1 | 09/01/2002 |
| Unwanted abs activation. *tr | |||
| 07/01/2007 | 39000 | 30 | 02/01/2002 |
| Tl*the contact owns a 2002 gmc sierra. while applying the brakes at 10 mph, the brake pedal extended all the way to the floor. the road conditions were dry. the vehicle was serviced for nhtsa recall number 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock) at 33,725 miles. the vehicle has not been inspected by a dealer. the current mileage was 39,600 and failure mileage was 39,000. the consumer stated the front rotors were replaced by the dealer due to the fact the rotors were damaged while performing the recall. the consumer stated replaced the rear rotors and pads at 35,000 miles due to corrosion and the consumer had to pull the fuse to the anti-lock system to properly drive vehicle home. updated 09/12/07 *tr | |||
| 04/16/2007 | 1 | ||
| Vehicle exhibiting same systems as nhtsa campaign id number: 05v379000. took vehicle to dealership to investigate, but was informed that because my vehicle was not on the list of states affected, there was nothing they could do. they could, however, charge me $120 for a diagnosis of the vehicle. i declined. there has been more than one occasion in which other vehicles have almost been hit from the rear as a result of vehicle not being able to stop. *jb | |||
| 08/20/2006 | 26128 | 3 | 04/01/2002 |
| Dt*: the contact stated while entering a driveway at 3 mph, the brakes did not stop the vehicle from hitting a light pole. this incident occurred after repairs indicated in recall # 05v379000 regarding service brakes, hydraulic:antilock were performed at the dealership. the absence of braking action at low speed happened due to malfunctioning of the speed sensors. the manufacturer was contacted and the outcome was a referral to customer service where a representative was supposed to be called back in 48 hours however no return call was received. the contact expressed dissatisfaction with the recall performed in the vehicle because the dealership indicated in the job order inspection or replacement of the affected sensors but no replacement were performed. *ak | |||
| 05/15/2005 | 40000 | 30 | 08/15/2003 |
| Low speed anti-lock activation. *jb | |||
| 04/19/2006 | 106997 | 1 | 02/27/2001 |
| Dt*: the contact stated the antilock brakes engage at low speeds. there is a nhtsa recall, # 05v379000, regarding the antilock brakes. the vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however it is not included in the recall due to the vin. | |||
| 03/24/2006 | 42000 | 1 | 01/01/2005 |
| Dt*: the contact stated while driving less than 10 mph and applying the brakes the abs pulsates. the vehicle veers to the left and the stopping distance is increased. upon inspection the dealership determined there is corrosion on the left abs sensor. there is a nhtsa recall, # 05v379000, regarding the abs. the vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however it is not included in the recall due to the vin. the vehicle is a 2002 gmc sierra k3500. updated 04/17/06. *jb | |||
| 02/28/2006 | 66414 | 2 | 10/18/2001 |
| 2002 gmc sierra 1500 low speed abs failure. currently under recall # 05v37900 and gm recall 05-068. after recall was performed the abs is still failing and this vehicle will not stop when under 5 mph. the true failure mode is not the abs sensor corroding, it is the wheel bearing having extreme wear and it renders the hall effect signal that the sensor reads bad. details: at 50k miles i had the same low speed abs failure. the truck was out of warranty at this time and i had to purchase genuine gm replacement parts and replace both front wheel bearing and sensors on my own dime. this fixed the first abs failure. then the recall came out for just the wheel sensor, not the bearing. now 12k miles later (truck has 66k miles) the driver side wheel bearing is now so sloppy that the abs sensor will not read the hall effect. this causes the low speed abs failure mode again. i have pulled the abs fuse under the hood so that the low speed failures stop, but now the truck has non functioning abs. lastly, after 12k miles on the replacement gm bearings there is so much slop in the bearing that the dealer has suggested that i should not drive this vehicle due to safety reasons. the driver side wheel is close to falling off the vehicle. i contacted gm customer service at 1-800 gmc truck by the recommendation of my dealer and gm customer service is has yet to contact the dealer for resolution in this matter. my only choice it to replace the wheel bearing at my own cost and i have already done that once 12k miles ago only to have the failure occur again. i will have to continue replacing the wheel bearings for the remainder of this vehicles service life to maintain a vehicle that can safely transport my family. i have no confidence is this vehicle remaining safe for any extended period of time. *jb what can nhsta do about this problem? | |||
| 02/08/2006 | 17000 | 30 | 12/03/2004 |
| The brakes on my gmc sierra were recalled because they can fail between 3 and 10 miles an hour. i took the truck in to be fix, however, i am still having trouble with the brakes- (i believe it is with the front wheel speed sensor -this is how it was listed on the recall paper). they seem to fail more under damp/moist/slippery conditions. when i called the dealership to tell them that the truck was still having problems after they had worked on the brakes their response was deal with it. i am sorry but i cannot just deal with brakes that you cannot trust. what kind of help can i get with this. they have worked on the brakes four times....and they are still not good. yesterday they took it and drove it....it was a nice and not bad conditions and they brought it back and said there was not a problem. i am sorry but there is a problem! they are very temperamental brakes! *nm | |||
| 01/30/2006 | 170000 | 1 | 11/01/2004 |
| Dt*: the contact stated the abs engages at speeds of 10mph and below. the stopping distance was increased as a result. there is a nhtsa recall, # 05v379000, regarding the abs system. the vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however it is not included in the recall due to the vin. the vehicle was not taken to a local dealership for repairs. | |||
| 11/15/2005 | 30000 | 1 | 04/15/2005 |
| Dt: the contact states there is a nhtsa recall, campaign 05v379000 regarding the anti lock brakes. the vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however, it is not included in the recall due to the vin. no repairs were made.*ak | |||
| 08/17/2005 | 1 | 04/05/2003 | |
| Consumer complaint regarding 2002 sierra brake rotors were bad and needed to be replaced, this almost caused consumer to go over a hill. *ts the consumer received recall 05v379000 after the repairs were made. the dealer had to replace the hub and speed sensor. the consumer requested reimbursement but the claim was denied. *nm | |||
| 09/01/2005 | 14500 | 1 | 08/01/2002 |
| Dt: the contact states had recall work completed, and the dealer discovered the rotors were severely corroded, and the brake pads needed to be replaced. the recall work was completed under nhtsa recall campaign 05v379000, concerning the anti-lock brakes. the service dealer suggested the metal contained in the rotors was defective. while the dealer acknowledged the fact that rotors should have a life span of more than 14,000 miles they refused to offer a free replacement. therefore, the rotors and brake pads have not been replaced. the contact felt the recall should be expanded to include replacement of the corroded rotors. *ak updated 09/05/07 *tr | |||
| 10/01/2005 | 62000 | 1 | 04/01/2002 |
| Dt: the contact states there is nhtsa recall campaign 05v379000 concerning the anti- lock brakes. this vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall, but it is not included in the recall due to vin. the vehicle has not been repaired. *ak the failure of the wheel speed sensor occurred at a low speed. updated 12/27/05. *jb | |||
| 11/01/2005 | 63838 | 1 | |
| On 01 nov, i was pulling into a parking spot when my brakes totally failed causing me to crash into a parked car. i was entering the parking spot below 5 mph when the brakes failed. i dropped my truck off at a repair center on 03 nov and they informed me that both the left front hub bearing was shot and the anti-lock brakes sensor was shot. both items were replaced.*jb | |||
| 10/19/2005 | 69000 | 1 | 07/07/2005 |
| Dt: contact stated there was recall 05v379000 concerning the abs system. a local service dealer performed the recall repairs. after the repairs were done the contact applied the brakes, but the vehicle would not stop. upon inspection, the dealer stated the front left hub needed to be replaced. the dealer replaced the hub, and this corrected the problem. he had to cover the cost of the repairs.*ak updated 11/29/05. *jb | |||
| 08/01/2004 | 4 | 11/13/2001 | |
| Dt:the consumer complained about the abs braking system at low speeds. the dealer told him that there was nothing else they could do for the vehicle because the warranty expired. this was the second time that the hubs have been replaced at the consumers expense. he heard there will be a recall in november, but they were only going to clean the sensors and not replace the hubs. his vehicle was purchased in pennsylvania. in august of 2004 the first hub was replaced, and in november 2004 he replaced the second hub. on october 26, 2005 the vehicle was taken to the dealership and both hubs need to be replaced again.*ak updated 11/29/05. *jb | |||
| 10/05/2005 | 28570 | 1 | 08/01/2002 |
| My 2002 gmc sierra 4wd p/u with 28,570 miles had abs brake failure. i came close to going through my garage door because of this and am glad it didn't happen at a busy intersection!! there is a recall on my vehicle for this problem, however it only applies to the salt belt states and wisconsin is not included!! unbelievable!! the dealership (von holzen) in ashland wi. replaced abs sensors p/n 15112379 ($225) also they had to replace both front brake rotors which could not be refaced as they would have been below specs. the whole bill came to $513.61!! i can't believe gmc doesn't have a recall for all states on the abs problem before there are abs caused fatalities!! von holzen dealership phone # 8003415440 has the old part. *nm | |||
| 07/08/2005 | 53000 | 1000 | 10/15/2004 |
| Have 2002 gmc sierra and the anti lock brakes are freezing or working at a slow speed or a stop. have called garages and they don't have the recall numbers. so i have to wait until released. how long must i wait!!! *jb | |||
| 08/17/2003 | 50000 | 13 | 09/05/2001 |
| 1. loss of brakes at low speeds, which caused me to back into a ditch while backing out of my driveway. it feels like the abs is kicking in, but you loose all control of the brakes. 2. have had to replace the brakes -- pads and rotors twice at my own expense in 46,000 miles. *jb | |||
| 06/15/2005 | 68000 | 1 | 11/20/2001 |
| Dt: the consumer complained about the abs system engaging at low speeds of 5-10 mph, and when coming to a stop , the braking would go away completely. the consumer had it temporally repaired. the consumer had not contacted the dealer where it was bought, but was planning to do that. the manufacturer has not been contacted. the vehicle is a 2002, gmc sierra pickup. the consumer has not checked with gm about recall information. *ak | |||
| 08/01/2005 | 90000 | 12 | 10/20/2004 |
| My truck is a 2002 gmc sierra, and is having the same problems as the antilock braking system recall. i was told that since i don't live in the eastern states that i don't fall into the recall. it is having purging problems on the antilock, and is having problems with stopping at different speeds, the brakes don't seem to want to stop it. *nm | |||
| 12/05/2003 | 10000 | 1 | |
| Low speed application of brakes on mixed traction surface ( bare road on left side ice and snow on right side). lead to unwanted activation of anti-locks. resulting in loss of control of truck and subsequent crash with personal injury and substantial property damage. police were notified but no report because it was in a subdivision. *jb | |||
| 07/09/2005 | 39092 | 1 | 03/20/2002 |
| Dt: 2002 gmc sierra. the consumer states the abs brakes started pulsating, and consumer's vehicle hit another vehicle. this caused the brakes to go out. the vehicle was taken to the dealership, they told him the abs sensors failed. they were cleaned and now they seem to be okay. this problem has not happened since. there was no warning light on when this happened. *ak *nm | |||
| 08/20/2005 | 39000 | 4 | 05/23/2002 |
| Dt: the contact states the abs system is bad. it almost caused an accident on 8-20-05 because brakes went to the floor. there was no braking power. had to shift the car into park to get the vehicle to stop. the contact was going very slowly when this happened. this was the first incident of this kind. the dealer repaired the vehicle. they replaced the wheel bearings, the hub, the rotors, and a cable that was attached to the wheel bearing on 8-22-05. it seems to be fixed as of now. *ak *jb | |||
| 08/16/2005 | 36000 | 9999 | 03/01/2005 |
| At slow speeds (below 10 mph) the anti lock brakes mess up and truck can not be stopped. would happen once in a while, now it happens every time i try to stop. almost ran into several people. i can not believe this problem has not been a recall considering that all the people i have talked to that have had the same problem and that i am sure there has had to been several accidents involving this. a dealer told me to pull the anti-lock fuse until i get it fixed which i have. truck now stops but i no longer have anti-lock brakes. *jb | |||
| 01/04/2005 | 48000 | 4 | 07/25/2002 |
| I have a 2002 gmc sierra with abs which falsely activates at slow speeds. many friends have had similar complaints, one of which connected me to you folks. the situation is as known in pe05020. the fix is temporary and typically lasts 9 - 12 months. *nm | |||
| 10/06/2004 | 40000 | 10 | 11/07/2001 |
| This complaint is to support investigation pe05020 1 - events leading to failure: my truck has been driven in ny state since it was purchased in late 2001. it has been properly maintained and serviced. 2 - failure and its consequences: after 40,000 miles, every time i came to a stop the anti-lock brakes would kick in (under 10 mph in completely dry conditions). this made the vehicle extremely difficult if not impossible to stop. i almost became involved in an accident on 3 or 4 separate occasions until i pulled the fuse for the abs system. pulling the fuse disables the system so i'm now driving without anti-lock brakes. certainly better than the alternative. 3 - corrective measures and availability of parts i brought the vehicle in for service to patrick gmc in rochester, ny. paid $85.73 to have it diagnosed. they indicated both front speed sensors were bad and both hub assemblies would need to be replaced at a cost of $432 per side plus tax. the sensor itself is not available - it must be purchased with an entire hub assembly. i did not have the work done and continue to drive the vehicle with the abs fuse pulled. the vehicle is unsafe to drive in any other condition (except if the hubs were replaced). the defective parts are still on my truck. *nm | |||
| 04/29/2005 | 1 | 02/01/2002 | |
| Gmc sierra 2002 the vehicle's antilock braking system engaged while being driven on dry pavement. *sc as a result i took the truck considerable time and distance to come to a complete stop. this braking problem had been occurring repeatedly over the past 6 months. *nm | |||
| 06/10/2005 | 1 | ||
| The consumer owns a 2002 gmc sierra in which the anti-lock brakes activate at low speeds increasing the stopping distance. *mr gm was aware of the problem in the northern states that the problem was caused by corrosion by winter road salt. *sc *jb | |||
| 05/13/2005 | 36000 | 10 | 06/05/2002 |
| Dt: 2002 sierra gmc had abs brake problems. the vehicle did not coming to a stop while consumer was at the gas pump. when vehicle operated at a slow speed the abs kicked in, making stopping difficult. the problem was erratic. consumer took vehicle to the dealer, and the dealer stated that there was a problem with abs system. consumer almost was involved in a crash yesterday because the vehicle would not stop. consumer had not done anything to correct this, and had been in contact with gmc. they said not to fix it, that there might be a recall. *ak | |||
| 02/09/2005 | 1 | ||
| 2002 gmc sierra anti lock brakes engaged when consumer attempted to stop. *mr on another occasion the anti lock brakes would not allow the vehicle to stop. the service department informed the consumer that the vehicles hub on the drivers side needed replaced. there was no light indication. rust would get under the sensors and lift them. *sc | |||
| 05/16/2005 | 36100 | 2 | 01/15/2002 |
| Consumer stated when driving slow the abs kicked in. it caused the consumer to have no brakes. the consumer could hear the abs kick in and no had lights come on. the consumer took the vehicle to the shop. the dealer informed the consumer the sensor had failed and she should contact gm. *jb | |||
| 09/20/2004 | 40000 | 10 | 12/27/2002 |
| The anti lock brakes on a 2002 gmc sierra extended cab pickup turn on (when they normally should not - dry stopping conditions) at low speed stops <10 mph. when they came on they would make stopping the vehicle very difficult. the last time the truck could not be stopped at a stop sign and went into a busy intersection, luckily with out an accident. to prevent the problem over the last six months i have had the fuse for the anti lock brakes removed to disable the anti lock feature completley. | |||
| 12/05/2004 | 57000 | 1 | 08/10/2001 |
| While driving at 5 mphthe antilock brakes (abs) malfunctioned and vehicle failed to stop. consumer called the dealer, and was informed there was flaw with the abs. *ak *nm | |||
| 01/25/2005 | 27000 | 1 | |
| While pulling vehicle into the garage the steering and brakes failed . as a result, vehicle collided into the side of the garage.*ak | |||
| 11/01/2004 | 1 | ||
| Abs system failed, sensor faulty causing abs to engage at 3-4 mph, preventing vehicle from coming to a stop easily. *bf the consumer noticed that all four rotors were rusted to the point of necessary replacement. *tc | |||
| 09/30/2004 | 3612 | 4 | 07/01/2002 |
| Consumer complained about a brake problem. the brake pedal goes to the floor, and it feels mushy. it takes an additional 50 feet to stop. owner is afraid he won't stop in time.*ak the consumer stated that the brakes have never been good. vehicle has been in the shop 4 times for brakes. *tc | |||
| 06/14/2004 | 39650 | 5 | |
| When applying the brakes from low speed brake pedal pulsated, resulting in extended stopping distance . dealer stated the rotors were rusted and flaking. *ak | |||
| 11/16/2003 | 16000 | 2 | 08/07/2001 |
| Anti lock brakes activated by themselves at low speeds. when depressing the brakes they pulsated and chattered. at low speed consumer's vehicle collided with the back door of the garage due to brake failure. no injuries were reported. *ak sensors were replaced by dealership. *la | |||
| 6136 | 6 | 01/04/2002 | |
| The vehicle was experiencing intermittent brake failure. the vehicle was taken to the dealer at least 6 times, however, the dealer was not able to duplicate or solve the problem. *ak the brakes would momentarily pause in stopping action, along with intermittent grabbing, then repeat itself. brake pulsation was also present. *sc *jb | |||
| 07/02/2002 | |||
| Abs system is not working properly, there is a grinding noise when applying brakes. contacted dealer, and the dealer is not willing to do anything.*ak | |||
| 03/26/2002 | 4 | 03/01/2002 | |
| Dealer claims they cannot duplicate problem. brake pedal will travel excessively when applied suddenly; so far, occurrence has been at slower speeds and intermittently. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - ABS WARNING LIGHT | |||
| 08/12/2004 | 40000 | 2 | 10/24/2001 |
| While driving on dry surfaces abs system engaged, fresulting in extended stopping distance. the part was replaced twice. however, problem recurred. *ak second occurance resulted in collision 'garage door'; return true; onmouseout=window.status=''; return true;>garage door. abs senser replaced a second time. *tc | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - CONTROL UNIT/MODULE | |||
| 06/20/2005 | 51000 | 25 | 05/23/2002 |
| Anti lock brakes would activate for for no reason at all once and a while at slow speeds condition got worse until i could not stop for a stop sign and also hit a curb i had to remove the fuse to disable the anti lock brakes to avoid a bad crash. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS | |||
| 09/03/2004 | 20407 | 2 | 01/02/2002 |
| Dt: the consumer's vehicle had brake problems. the vehicle was taken to the dealer on sept. 3, 2004. all 4 brakes and rotors were replaced. the rotors broke on removal due to all the corrosion. new rotors were install but they have corroded again. *nm consumer heard clunking noise when turning steering wheel, dealership technician lubed the intermediate steering wheel and clunking was gone. after getting the rotors and brakes replaced about 2,026 miles later they have to be replaced again because of corroding.*sb | |||
| 03/17/2005 | 28794 | 1 | 09/30/2002 |
| Steady braking performance degradation since new, in conjuction with premature rear brake failure @ 28000 mi (2.5 yrs old), while front brakes still had over 50% remaining pad life. dealer stated that rear rotor rust caused rear pad failure. inspection of rear pads indicate other problems-uneven front to rear wear on lr inner pad .018 -.044, while lr outer pad had no brake material left. rr outer pad had slight grooving across top with thickness between .110-.118, rr inner pad had grooving top and bottom, with between .122-.151 thickness pad material left. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC | |||
| 01/31/2005 | 7000 | 2 | 10/08/2002 |
| Dt: consumer heard something pop ping and fell into the street. consumer had no brakes in the rear. in the front the brake disc was badly pitted because of the poor quality of alloy. consumer was driving up to a stop, trying stop, when the brakes failed. consumer sailed on through the stop sign. the front brakes were grinding due to the metal on the disc. the consumer had to replace with a whole new braking system with aftermarket products. consumer did not feel safe with the gm brakes. this happened all of a sudden, there were no prior problems. this vehicle only has 8,000 miles on it. this happened while slowing down between 10 and 15 mph.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - CALIPER | |||
| 04/07/2005 | 81926 | 1 | |
| 2002 gmc sierra developed serious brake problems.*mr while driving 70 mph the right front brake caliper froze. this resulted in extreme heat and casued the hub and bearing assembly to come apart. *nm | |||
| 1 | |||
| While having the tires rotated a technician noticed a groove cut from a rock between the brake caliper and the rim. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - PADS | |||
| 09/01/2005 | 14500 | 1 | 08/01/2002 |
| Dt: the contact states had recall work completed, and the dealer discovered the rotors were severely corroded, and the brake pads needed to be replaced. the recall work was completed under nhtsa recall campaign 05v379000, concerning the anti-lock brakes. the service dealer suggested the metal contained in the rotors was defective. while the dealer acknowledged the fact that rotors should have a life span of more than 14,000 miles they refused to offer a free replacement. therefore, the rotors and brake pads have not been replaced. the contact felt the recall should be expanded to include replacement of the corroded rotors. *ak updated 09/05/07 *tr | |||
| 02/04/2005 | 25000 | 12 | 07/08/2002 |
| The disc brake pads jam and fail to make proper contact with the rotors when dirt gets in the area that the brake pads ride on 'runners (stainless steel sheet metal covers the mounting frame where it rides . the clearance is so close and road it will jam the pads. this requires disassembly of all of the brake caliper and grinding of the rotor frequently. the pads not pressing on the rotors properly allow the rotor to rust further degrading the brake performance and causes uneven braking and greatly increased stopping distance -- i have had to overhaul the brakes three times and the repair mechanic says all gm trucks have the same problem | |||
| 08/04/2004 | 32000 | 1 | |
| Premature brake wear required brakes and rotors to be replaced at 32,000 miles. service order indicated delamination of brake rotor caused the wear. this is contrary to the long life brakes that were indicated to me during the sale of this vehicle. bought new.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - ROTOR | |||
| 04/20/2006 | 28504 | 1 | 12/31/2001 |
| During periodic safety inspection the dealer found that the rear disc brake rotors were badly rusted and providing little braking action. vehicle is four years old with only 29,000 miles on it. replaced at a cost of $850. *nm | |||
| 09/01/2005 | 14500 | 1 | 08/01/2002 |
| Dt: the contact states had recall work completed, and the dealer discovered the rotors were severely corroded, and the brake pads needed to be replaced. the recall work was completed under nhtsa recall campaign 05v379000, concerning the anti-lock brakes. the service dealer suggested the metal contained in the rotors was defective. while the dealer acknowledged the fact that rotors should have a life span of more than 14,000 miles they refused to offer a free replacement. therefore, the rotors and brake pads have not been replaced. the contact felt the recall should be expanded to include replacement of the corroded rotors. *ak updated 09/05/07 *tr | |||
| 07/07/2005 | 40000 | 2 | 07/07/2005 |
| Dt: 2002 gmc sierra. the consumer states the steering shaft bounced up and down, it was not correctly put in. this caused the front end bounce from the steering box to the steering wheel. this problem has been corrected, but the dealership stated they were having a lot of these problems. this has been happening since the purchase of the vehicle. the consumer thought the vehicle was out of alignment. also, the rotors a had to be replaced because of the shaft bouncing up and down. the right tie rod was also replaced. the problem was constant with the vehicle.*ak | |||
| 09/10/2005 | 57000 | 2 | 03/29/2002 |
| Dt: the brake rotors are warping. there is rusting in the brake area. the consumer first noticed the problem on september 10, 2005. the consumer had the rotors cut to take off the bad metal. there have been no accidents. *ak | |||
| 08/20/2005 | 39000 | 4 | 05/23/2002 |
| Dt: the contact states the abs system is bad. it almost caused an accident on 8-20-05 because brakes went to the floor. there was no braking power. had to shift the car into park to get the vehicle to stop. the contact was going very slowly when this happened. this was the first incident of this kind. the dealer repaired the vehicle. they replaced the wheel bearings, the hub, the rotors, and a cable that was attached to the wheel bearing on 8-22-05. it seems to be fixed as of now. *ak *jb | |||
| 03/06/2005 | 47348 | 1 | 12/15/2001 |
| Dt: the front and rear rotors fell apart. the mechanic had to replace the rotors at 47,000 miles. he said it was a common problem. the consumer went to the dealer and they said it was normal. the consumer sent letters to gmc and they are returning letters. *ak *jb | |||
| 05/16/2005 | 9000 | 3 | 07/23/2002 |
| Dt: consumer stated brake failure resulted in extended stopping distance. took to a dealer for this issue 3 times. dealer's general manager said there was some type of problem but he did not know what caused it. no repairs or parts replaced. *ak on oct 18, 2004 the rear rotors were turned. even after the rotors were turned the brakes still performed poorly. the right fog light fell off while driving. *nm | |||
| 07/01/2004 | 22000 | 100 | 05/24/2002 |
| Dt: while driving vehicle experienced extended stopping distance but no noises. there was no accident or any other problems. took car to dealer ,they stated rotors were rusted and worn out, and needed to be replaced. no problems since. *ak | |||
| 09/03/2004 | 20407 | 2 | 01/02/2002 |
| Dt: the consumer's vehicle had brake problems. the vehicle was taken to the dealer on sept. 3, 2004. all 4 brakes and rotors were replaced. the rotors broke on removal due to all the corrosion. new rotors were install but they have corroded again. *nm consumer heard clunking noise when turning steering wheel, dealership technician lubed the intermediate steering wheel and clunking was gone. after getting the rotors and brakes replaced about 2,026 miles later they have to be replaced again because of corroding.*sb | |||
| 02/15/2005 | 53000 | 2 | 10/27/2001 |
| I took my truck in for an oil change and the dealer told me that my truck (50,000 miles) needed new front rotors because mine were de-laminated i asked how this could happen and the mechanic could not give me a clear answer. the gm assistance center told me that the dealership told them the reason for this was i refused some dealer recommended maintenance, although the dealership service manager said that was not the case. i spoke to a metalurgist and he stated the problem was most likely from the manufacturing process caused by not cooling the rotors properly after the were cast, since both rotors are only defective on the inside face. i also own a 1990 chevy truck with 270,000 miles that still has the original rotors. i am afraid this defect could cause an occurrence of brake failure and i am afraid to drive the truck under highway conditions. also, after asking numerous others, no one (other than gm) has heard of this phenomenon. *nm | |||
| 11/01/2004 | 1 | ||
| Abs system failed, sensor faulty causing abs to engage at 3-4 mph, preventing vehicle from coming to a stop easily. *bf the consumer noticed that all four rotors were rusted to the point of necessary replacement. *tc | |||
| 10/20/2004 | 36800 | 1 | 06/01/2002 |
| Our 2002 gmc sierra was being inspected for state inspection when it was discovered that the rotors had completely rusted out. contacted gmc and they told us that theyknew there was a problem, but that it would only be covered if reoprted during warranty period our warranty had expired as the vehicle had 36,800 miles on it and warranty wasonly for 36,000 miles. rotors had to be replaced because vehicle was unsafe.*ak | |||
| 09/09/2004 | 32200 | 10/15/2001 | |
| My 2002 gmc sierra has a braking problem when stopping from a slow speed. i took my concern to the dealer and they said the rear rotors were rusted and may need to be replaced. i think this should be a warranty issue as the truck has 32,000 miles and is less than 3 years old, it is unsafe to drive as it is. they tell me it is because i live in the northeast and is not a defect in materials. in 2002 at a brake symposium, sponsered by the manufacturers, it was noted that gmc took the metal chromium ouof the rotor alloy to save money. chromium resists rust. is there any help available? | |||
| 08/02/2004 | 12000 | 1 | |
| Consumer took vehicle to the dealer for a tire rotation, and was told that the rotors were eating up the brake pads. dealership repaired the braking system by resurfacing the rotors and providing new pads. however, because of the steel being used the rotors will continue to eat up the pads, and this operation will need to be resolved every 10,000 miles. manufacturer stated that the climate where consumer lived was the reason why the problem occurred. *ak | |||
| 07/25/2004 | 19975 | 1 | 04/22/2002 |
| Vehicle has 19000 miles on it and the brake rotors are badly scored and rusted, resulting in a pulsating brake pedal and the requirement of greater brake pedal pressure to stop the vehicle. the problem is primarily with the rear brakes, but the front brakes are starting to show the same signs. a recent brake inspection indicates that the brake pads are well within tolerance for wear, but the rotors will not pass pennsylvania state safety inspection in their current condition. i have consulted with at least four other individuals with similar vehicles that have encountered the same problem. *ak | |||
| 06/14/2004 | 39650 | 5 | |
| When applying the brakes from low speed brake pedal pulsated, resulting in extended stopping distance . dealer stated the rotors were rusted and flaking. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DRUM | |||
| 05/12/2005 | 35700 | 1 | 02/28/2002 |
| Dt: at state inspection it was discovered that rear brakes wore out prematurely. had since then replaced the brakes. no other problems with vehicle.*ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - POWER ASSIST - HYDRAULIC | |||
| 03/31/2005 | 40490 | 1 | 05/22/2002 |
| While my 17 year old son was driving, the truck suddenly lost all power steering and brake capability. my son was traveling with his younger brother and a friend in the vehicle. *ak | |||
| 02/16/2005 | 44600 | 1 | 04/05/2002 |
| Vehicle is a 2002 gmc 6.0l 2500hd sierra truck. it has the gm hydroboost braking system (brake assist is from the power steering pump). the pressure line running from the brake booster to the steering rack was incorrectly routed, resulting in a very sharp bend in the flexible part of hose. the hose cracked at this point, and leaked some. the failure was caught early, and there was no accident or fire. however, if this leak had not been noticed, at some point all power assist braking and steering could have been lost. i have pictures of the incorrect routing, and the old hose if needed.*ak | |||