Peterbilt 335 2005

Model 335 made in 2005 by Peterbilt got 1 consumer complain there is 1 recall as well as 1 service bulletin. Consumer complaints with reference to engine and engine cooling. . Technical service bulletines regarding service brakes, air. There was one recall concerning parking brake .

Model 2005

Recalls


CampaignManufacturerManufacturing dateType# of units affectedDate Owner notified MfgRecall Initiated byManufacturers of recalled vehicles/productsReport Recieved DateRecord Creation DateRegulation Part NumberFMVSS Number
PARKING BRAKE - DRIVELINE - HYDRAULIC
05V417000PACCAR INCORPORATEDfrom 06/15/2004 to 03/30/2005V (Vehicle)33311/04/2005MFRPACCAR INCORPORATED09/20/200509/20/2005
Defect SummaryOn certain trucks equipped with hydraulic brakes, there may be a defect in the anchor bolt of some bosch model #305 parking brake assemblies. a different coating was applied to the bolt which did not meet paccar specifications. this could reduce the fatigue life of the bolt and lead to premature failure.
Consequence SummaryIf this bolt were to fail, the truck could roll away while parked without warning, which could result in a crash.
Corrective SummaryDealers will inspect the parking brake assembly and replace the defective bolts free of charge. peterbilt's recall began on november 4, 2005; and kenworth began on november 4, 2005. owners may contact kenworth at 1-425-828-5440 or peterbilt at 1-940-591-4201.
NotesKenworth recall not. 05kw5; peterbilt recall no. 905c.customers may also contact the national highway traffic safety administration's vehicle safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (tty 1-800-424-9153), or go to http://www.safercar.gov.

Bulletins


BulletinBulletin dateReplacement BulletinItem no.SummaryAdded
SERVICE BRAKES, AIR - SLACK ADJUSTERS - AUTOMATIC
2207/19/200610020261Auto slack adjusters. *tt08/21/2006

Consumer Complaints


Fail datemilesoccurencesPurchase date
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING - COOLING SYSTEM
05/23/2010400000
 Tl-the contact owns a 2005 peterbilt 335 rollback wrecker. the contact was performing repairs on the vehicle and detected the firewall was cracked at the radiator reservoir. the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer where the technician stated the owner would be responsible for the repair. the vehicle had not been repaired at the time of the complaint. the contact was displeased to know that there was not a free service repair offered by the dealer for the defect. the failure mileage was 400,000. the vin was unavailable. js