Bulletins
| Bulletin | Bulletin date | Replacement Bulletin | Item no. | Summary | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||||
| 00506 | 03/17/2006 | 10019666 | Inconsistent or unusual brake feeling. *tt | 04/17/2006 | |
| 00402 | 09/16/2002 | 00402R | 10007583 | Front brake vibration. *mj *sc | 07/01/2004 |
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | |||||
| 5026 | 05/19/2005 | 10016182 | Diagnostics - anti-lock brake system (denso made). repair manual correction. 00400-rm445. 00400-rm956-u1. 00400-rm109-1u1. *tt | 09/01/2005 | |
Investigations
| NHTSA ID | Manufacturer | Date open | Date close | Subject | Recall campaign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DIFFERENTIAL PROPORTIONAL VALVE | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
| PE09049 | TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION | 10/06/2009 | 01/26/2010 | FRAME CORROSION | 09V444000 | |
| This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v-444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (i.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v-444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (i.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by nhtsa that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. | ||||||
Consumer Complaints
| Fail date | miles | occurences | Purchase date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES | |||
| 02/20/2013 | 148000 | 1 | |
| Vehicle vsc trac and vsc off light flash at random at any time any speed. appears to effect thousands of toyota's. worried it will cause and uncontrolled throttle/brake application. *tr | |||
| 02/20/2013 | 148000 | ||
| Vehical vsc trac and vsc off light flash at random at any time any speed. appears to effect thousands of toyota's. worried it will cause and uncontrolled thorttle/brake application. | |||
| 04/15/2012 | 109000 | 1 | |
| Rear end leaking oil. mechanic able to put finger through housing due to severe rusting. entire rear end replaced under extended warranty i purchased. entire frame rusted heavily. all welds severely rusted. frame integrity gone. front arm rusted so badly mechanic says it will not pass inspection in october, 2012. front arm so rusted it is likely to collapse. emergency brake not functioning due to heavy corrosion...advised to replace. body immaculate. no rust anywhere but frame. *tr | |||
| 04/15/2012 | 109000 | ||
| Rear end leaking oil. mechanic able to put finger through housing due to severe rusting. entire rear end replaced under extended warranty i purchased. entire frame rusted heavily. all welds severely rusted. frame integrity gone. front arm rusted so badly mechanic says it will not pass inspection in october, 2012. front arm so rusted it is likely to collapse. emergency brake not functioning due to heavy corrosion...advised to replace. body immaculate. no rust anywhere but frame. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, ELECTRIC | |||
| 06/07/2009 | |||
| The 2004 toyota tundra that i have had to have the both front rotors replaced due to warping and serious vibrations during braking. i researched this on the toyota forums and all over the internet. this is a well documented issue that many of us owners have complained about to toyota. toyota has not addressed this issue as the rotors were made to small for the size and weight of the vehicle. this is clearly a design flaw that has been overlooked. vibrations. see article http://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/toyota_tundra_brakes.html i had to fix these brakes out of my own pocket like the rest of toyota tundra owners. this should have been recalled. thanks. | |||
| 02/27/2009 | 70000 | 1 | |
| The brakes failed to disengage the cruise control and the vehicle continued to gain in speed as i was exiting the freeway. i turned the ignition off and tried to navigate a left turn at 70+ mph. with the rear end hopping somehow i negotiated the turn but could not turn again. i crossed the next street and ended up going thru the wall of an apartment building and stopped in the middle of the living room. it was only god's design for me not to die this day. had i not made the first turn i was going to run into a small grove of mature trees. also, if any other cars had been on the street i could not have avoided them. luckily the single mother of 3 small children were not in the living room. *tr | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC | |||
| 09/11/2007 | 37563 | 1 | |
| Front disc brake rotors subject to repeated warping causing front wheel to vibrate when braking and making the vehicle hard to control. *tr | |||
| 01/20/2008 | 44000 | 1 | |
| 2004 toyota tundra with 44000 miles has developed a brake problem. air repeatedly gets into the brake lines with no loss of fluid causing the brake pedal to go to the floor when braking. the tundra has been at the dealer for four months trying to be repaired, the toyota rep has visited on five separate occasions, called the factory engineers and it is still not fixed! repairs cost to date are over $3500, toyota picked up $2,000 leaving me out of pocket $1500+ and a truck that has a defective braking system that must be bled every 75 miles to remain drivable. this problem started in mid january 2008. *tr | |||
| 08/01/2006 | 10000 | 350 | 08/01/2004 |
| Tl*the contact owns a 2004 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the stopping distance extended when he depressed the brake pedal. the dealer was unable to diagnose the cause of the failure; however, they adjusted the brakes. approximately six months later, the failure recurred. the contact took the vehicle to a different dealer and they were unable to diagnose the cause of the failure; however, they adjusted the brakes again. as of december 26, 2007, the failure had not recurred. the contact felt that the slack adjuster caused the failure, but the dealer stated that the slack adjuster was fine. the speed was unknown. the failure mileage was 10,000 and current mileage was 21,000. updated 01/17/08. *lj | |||
| 02/07/2007 | 31419 | 3 | 06/04/2004 |
| I own a 2004 toyota tundra purchased in june of 2004 (new). up to date i have 31,000 (thousand) miles on it and have been forced to replace the brakes on the truck three times. i have called and complained to toyota and they have done nothing so far. *nm | |||
| 03/10/2006 | 27800 | 1 | 05/19/2004 |
| When i complained about front end brake shimmy they stated there is a tsb on the front brake system. when i asked if dangerous until i get fixed i was told no. i got into an accident the day before my appointment to get the tsb repaired. now my brakes are at 50% 8 months after replacement as well. *jb | |||
| 07/11/2005 | 13627 | 1 | 05/14/2005 |
| I have a 04 double cab toyota tundra. wife was driving and trying to stop .when she pressed the brake pedal truck kept on rolling and smashed into the car in front of her. an inspection was done on my truck and they said nothing was wrong but it was totaled by the body shop so there was nothing to change or fix. i've been looking at a web site called tundra solutions and there is more people with this same braking problem or brake fade as the call it. please feel free to call me to get more info. *nm | |||
| 04/01/2005 | 13000 | 1 | 08/27/2004 |
| Dt: consumer needs new brake rotors and pad. they needed to be replaced after 13,000 miles. the rear brakes were also out of adjustment.*ak *sb *nm | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK | |||
| 01/01/2004 | 0 | 1 | 12/31/2003 |
| The brakes on my 2004 toyota tundra double-cab do not work properly (and never have). when you press on the brake pedal, the brakes make a loud noise (not the typical anti-lock brake noise) and do not stop effectively. i've almost ran into cars in front of me. i took it to stevinson toyota, but they said the brakes were fine. they weren't. i took it pep boys and they replaced the pads & turned the rotors. it is better, but still bad. i think i'll get rid of the truck. someone is going to get hurt with this brake situation on the truck model. *tr | |||
| 01/28/2007 | 40000 | 1 | |
| Rear bearing failure in 2004 toyota tundra, related parts abs gear broke. not able to control truck at a regular stop feels like truck wants to keep going. also feels like the rear violently shifts. number of vehicles with same problem are unknown. but is a ordinary thing according to local dealers!!!!!!!!! *jb | |||
| 04/05/2005 | 1 | ||
| While drivingthe vehicle skidded into the right lane. driver applied the brakes and the pedal went to the floor. driver was able to maintain control of the vehicle, and took vehicle to the dealer for inspection. however, mechanic insisted that the problem could not be duplicated. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - ANTILOCK - CONTROL UNIT/MODULE | |||
| 02/17/2006 | 14000 | 3 | 07/12/2004 |
| My abs brake system light comes on under conditions of cold (around freezing) and damp weather. once the vehicle has warmed up the light goes off, but the ats doesn't work until that happens. toyota refuses to address the issue. they claim no one has filed a complaint. the truck is under warranty and they will not replace any parts. *nm | |||
| 01/03/2005 | 20000 | 1 | |
| Vehicle is experiencing brake failure. while driving down hill in light snow the vehicle was picking up speed as the brakes were applied. took the vehicle into the dealership, and was told that this was the normal function of the brakes, and everything was working correctly. *ak | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - PADS | |||
| 08/31/2006 | 46000 | 7 | 08/22/2004 |
| Dt*: the contact stated the brake pads wore out with extremely low mileage on 7 occasions. the rotors also required replacement due to premature failure. the service dealer and manufacturer were notified. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DISC - ROTOR | |||
| 08/31/2006 | 46000 | 7 | 08/22/2004 |
| Dt*: the contact stated the brake pads wore out with extremely low mileage on 7 occasions. the rotors also required replacement due to premature failure. the service dealer and manufacturer were notified. | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - FOUNDATION COMPONENTS - DRUM - DRUM | |||
| 12/01/2006 | 1 | 10/08/2004 | |
| Toyota tundra truck shakes under braking. during brake service rear brake drums found to be warped. *jb | |||
| SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC - POWER ASSIST - HYDRAULIC | |||
| 05/11/2005 | 17300 | 2 | 11/29/2003 |
| 1) normal everyday driving. 2)front rotars warped and rear drums warped caused erratic stoping ability and vibration. 3)recut rotars and drums. new pads in front. problem is back after about 500 miles. | |||